Why be an anti-individualist?

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research

Volumn 77, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 105-141

  Schroeter, Laura ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61249233817     PISSN: 00318205     EISSN: 19331592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2008.00178.x     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Bach, Kent. 1987. Thought and Reference. Oxford: Clarendon.
2. Boghossian, Paul. 1992. Externalism and Inference. Philosophical Issues 2: 11-37.
3. - 1994. The Transparency of Mental Content. Philosophical Perspectives 8: 33-50.
4. Burge, Tyler. 1977. Belief De Re. Journal of Philosophy 74: 338-362.
5. - 1979. Individualism and the Mental. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5: 73-122.
6. - 1982. Other Bodies. In Thought and Object, edited by A. Woodfield. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. - 1986a. Individualism and Psychology. Philosophical Review 95: 3- 45.
8. - 1986b. Cartesian Error and the Objectivity of Perception. In Subject, Thought, and Context, edited by P. Pettit and J. McDowell. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. - 1986c. Intellectual Norms and Foundations of Mind. Journal of Philosophy 83: 697-720.
10. - 1988. Individualism and Self-Knowledge. Journal of Philosophy 85: 649-65.
11. - 1993a. Concepts, Definitions, and Meaning. Metaphilosophy 24: 309-325.
12. - 1993b. Content Preservation. Philosophical Review 102: 457-488.
13. - 1996. Our Entitlement to Self-Knowledge. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96: 91-116.
14. - 1998. Memory and Self-Knowledge. In Externalism and Self- Knowledge, edited by P. Ludlow and N. Martin. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
15. Carroll, Lewis. 1895. What the Tortoise said to Achilles. Mind 4: 278- 80.
16. Chalmers, David. 1996. The Conscious Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. - 2002. The Components of Content. In Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings, edited by D. Chalmers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Crimmins, Mark. 1992. Talk About Beliefs. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
19. Crimmins, Mark and John Perry. 1989. The Prince and the Phone Booth: Reporting Puzzling Beliefs. Journal of Philosophy 86: 685- 711.
20. Donellan, Keith. 1966. Reference and Definite Descriptions. Philosophical Review 75: 281-304.
21. Egan, Frances. 1995. Computation and Content. Philosophical Review 104: 181-203.
22. Evans, Gareth. 1973. The Causal Theory of Names. Aristotelian Society Supp. 47: 187-208.
23. - 1982. The Varieties of Reference. New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Fodor, Jerry. 1987. Psychosemantics. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
25. - 1994. The Elm and the Expert. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
26. - 1998. Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Forbes, Graeme. 1989. Cognitive Architecture and the Semantics of Belief. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 14: 84-100.
28. Frege, Gottlob.1892 / 1997. On Sinn and Bedeutung. In The Frege Reader, edited by M. Beany. Oxford: Blackwell.
29. Grice, Paul. 1969. Vacuous Names. In Words and Objections, edited by J. Hintikka. Dordrecht: Reidel.
30. Humberstone, Lloyd. and Aubrey Townsend. 1994. Co-instantiation and Identity. Philosophical Studies 74: 243-274.
31. Jackson, Frank. 1998a. From Ethics to Metaphysics: A Defense of Conceptual Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. - 1998b. Reference and Description Revisited. Philosophical Perspectives 12: 201-218.
33. Kaplan, David. 1989a. Afterthoughts. In Themes from Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. - 1989b. Demonstratives. In Themes from Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Kitcher, Philip. 1978. Theories, Theorists, and Theoretical Change.Philosophical Review 87: 519-47.
36. Kripke, Saul. 1972. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
37. Lawlor, Krista. 2001. New Thoughts about Old Things: Cognitive Policies as the Ground of Singular Concepts. New York: Garland Publishing.
38. McDowell, John. 1977. On the Sense and Reference of a Proper Name. Mind 86: 159-85.
39. Peacocke, Christopher. 1992. A Study of Concepts. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
40. - 1994. Content, Computation, and Externalism. Mind and Language 9: 303-335.
41. Perry, John. 1980. A Problem about Continued Belief. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 61: 317-32.
42. - 1988. Cognitive Significance and New Theories of Reference. Noûs 22: 1-18.
43. - 2001a. Knowledge, Possibility, and Consciousness. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
44. - 2001b. Reference and Reflexivity. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
45. Putnam, Hilary. 1975a. Explanation and Reference. In Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
46. - 1975b. The Meaning of 'Meaning.' Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7: 131-93.
47. Recanati, François. 1993. Direct Reference: From Language to Thought. Oxford: Blackwell.
48. Richard, Mark. 1990. Propositional Attitudes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. Salmon, Nathan. 1986. Frege's Puzzle. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
50. Schroeter, Laura. 2003. Gruesome Diagonals. Philosophers' Imprint 3(3): 1-23.
51. - 2007. The Illusion of Transparency. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85: 1-22.
52. Schroeter, Laura and John Bigelow. 2008. Jackson's Classical Model of Meaning. In Mind, Ethics, and Conditionals: Themes from the Philosophy of Frank Jackson, edited by I. Ravenscroft. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53. Schroeter, Laura and François Schroeter. Forthcoming. A Third Way in Metaethics. Noûs.
54. Searle, John. 1958. Proper Names. Mind 67: 166-173.
55. Segal, Gabriel. 2000. A Slim Book about Narrow Content. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
56. Shapiro, Lawrence. 1993. Content, Kinds, and Individualism in Marr's Theory of Vision. Philosophical Review 102: 489-513.
57. Soames, Scott. 2002. Beyond Rigidity: the unfinished agenda of Naming and Necessity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58. Stalnaker, Robert. 1978. Assertion. Syntax and Semantics 9: 315-332.
59. - 2001. On Considering a Possible World as Actual. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supp. 75: 141-56.
60. - 2004. Assertion Revisited: On the Interpretation of Two-Dimensional Modal Semantics. Philosophical Studies 118: 299-338.