Analogues of knowability

Australasian Journal of Philosophy

Volumn 81, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 481-495

  Devidi, David ^a   Kenyon, Tim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61149212601     PISSN: 00048402     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713659757     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Brogaard, Berit and Joe Salerno 2002. Clues to the Paradoxes of Knowability: Reply to Dummett and Tennant, Analysis 62: 143-50.
2. DeVidi, David and Graham Solomon 2001. Knowability and Intuitionistic Logic, Philosophia: Philosophical Quarterly of Israel 28: 319-34.
3. Fitch, Frederic 1963. A Logical Analysis of Some Value Concepts, Journal of Symbolic Logic 28:135-42.
4. Hand, Michael and Jonathan Kvanvig 1999. Tennant on Knowability, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77: 422-8.
5. Hart, W. D. 1979. The Epistemology of Abstract Objects: Access and Inference, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 53: 153-65.
6. Kenyon, Tim 2003. Cynical Assertion: Convention, Intention, and Saying 'Uncle', American Philosophical Quarterly 40: 241-8.
7. Kenyon, Tim (unpublished). Anti-realism, Paradox, and Cognitive Constraint.
8. Tennant, Neil 1997. The Taming of the True, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Tennant, Neil 2001a. Is Every Truth Knowable? Reply to Hand and Kvanvig, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79: 107-13.
10. Tennant, Neil 2001b. Is Every Truth Knowable? A Reply to Williamson, Ratio 14: 262-80.
11. Williamson, Timothy 2000. Tennant on Knowable Truth, Ratio 13: 99-114.