The materiality of territorial production: A conceptual discussion of territoriality, materiality, and the everyday life of public space

Space and Culture

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 437-453

  Kärrholm, Mattias ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Actor network theory (ANT); Everyday life; Materiality; Public space; Territoriality; Urban design

Indexed keywords

EID: 61049106908     PISSN: 12063312     EISSN: 15528308     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1206331207304356     Document Type: Review

References (73)

1. Agnew, J. (2000). Territoriality. In R. J. Johnston, D. Gregory, G. Pratt, & M. Watts (Eds.), The dictionary of human geography (pp. 823-824). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
2. Albertsen, N., & Diken, B. (2003). What is the social? Retrieved May 14, 2004, from http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/Albertsen-Diken- What-Is-the-Social.pdf
3. Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
4. Altman, I., & Chemers, M. (1980). Culture and environment. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
5. Bell, P. A., Greene, T. C., Fisher, J. D., & Baum, A. (1996). Environmental psychology (4 th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
6. Brown, B. B. (1987). Territoriality. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 505-531). New York: John Wiley.
7. Brown, S. D., & Capdevila, R. (1999). Perpetuum mobile: Substance, force and the sociology of translation. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor-network theory and after (pp. 26-50). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers/ Sociological Review Monograph.
8. Cohen, A. (1985). The symbolic construction of community. London: Routledge.
9. Cresswell, T. (1996). In place/out of place. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
10. Cresswell, T. (2004). Place. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
11. Crouch, D. (1994). Territories, places and cultural identity. Odense, Denmark: Odense University Press.
12. Dant, T. (2004). Materiality and society. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
13. de Certeau, M. (1988). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14. de Laet, M., & Mol, A. (2000). The Zimbabwe bush pump: Mechanics of a fluid technology. Social Studies of Science, 30, 225 - 263.
15. Delaney, D. (2005). Territory, Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
16. Deleuze, G. (1999). Foucault. London: Continuum.
17. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
18. Dovey, K. (1999). Framing places. London: Routledge.
19. Edney, J. J. (1976). Human territoriality. In H. M. Proshansky, W. H. Ittelson, & L. G. Rivlin (Eds.), Environmental psychology (2 nd ed.) (pp. 189-205). New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
20. Forty, A. (2000). Words and buildings. London: Thames & Hudson.
21. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge (C. Gordon, Ed.). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
22. Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. In H. L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208-228). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
23. Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places. New York: Free Press.
24. Gottman, J. (1973). The significance of territory. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
25. Gottman, J. (1975). The evolution of the concept of territory. Social Science Information, 14 (3-4). 29-47.
26. Greimas, A. J. (1987). On meaning: Selected writings in semiotic theory. London: Frances Pinter.
27. Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Hajer, M., & Reijndorp, A. (2001). In search of new public domain. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Nai.
29. Häkli, J. (1994). Territoriality and the rise of the modern state. Helsinki: Geographical Society of Finland.
30. Hall, E. (1959). The silent language. New York: Doubleday.
31. Hammad, M. (2002). The privatisation of space. Lund, Sweden: LTH.
32. Johnston, R. (1996). Territoriality. In A. J. Kuper (Ed.), The social science encyclopedia. London: Routledge.
33. Kärrholm, M. (2005). Territorial complexity in public places-A study of territorial production at three squares in Lund. Nordic Journal of Architectural Research, 2005 (1). 99-114.
34. Kärrholm, M. (2007). Territory, a short introduction, Delaney David [Book review]. Geografiska Annnaler, 89, 76-78.
35. Korosec-Serfaty, P. (1973). The case of newly constructed zones: Freedom, constraint and the appropriation of spaces. In R. Küller (Ed.), Architectural psychology: Proceedings of the Lund Conference. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.
36. Latour, B. (1991). Technology is society made durable. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters (pp. 103-131). London: Routledge.
37. Latour, B. (1996). On interobjectivity. Mind, Culture and Activity, 3, 228 - 245.
38. Latour, B. (1997). Trains of thought, Piaget, formalism and the fifth dimension. Common Knowledge, 6, 170 - 191.
39. Latour, B. (1998). How to be iconophilic in art, science, and religion? In C. A. Jones & P. Galison (Eds.), Picturing science, producing art (pp. 418-440). London: Routledge.
40. Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. London: Oxford University Press.
42. Law, J. (1994). Organizing modernity. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
43. Law, J. (2002). Objects and spaces. Theory, Culture & Society, 19 (5-6). 91-105.
44. Law, J., & Mol, A. (2001). Situating technoscience: An inquiry into spatialities. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 19, 609 - 621.
45. Law, J., & Singleton, V. (2003). Object lessons. Retrieved from http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/Law-Singleton-Object-Lessons.pdf
46. Lee, N., & Brown, S. (1994). Otherness and the actor network: The undiscovered continent. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 772 - 790.
47. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
48. Lofland, L. (1998). The public realm. New York: Aldine de Gruyter s.
49. MacAndrew, F. (1993). Environmental psychology. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
50. Madanipour, A. (2003). Public and private spaces of the city. London: Routledge.
51. Malmberg, T. (1980). Human territoriality. The Hague: Mouton.
52. Malmberg, T. (1994). Er territorialitet tabu? In J. Tonboe (Ed.), Territorialitet, Rumlige, historiske og kulturelle perspektiver. Odense, Denmark: Odense Universitetsforlag.
53. Markus, T. A. (1993). Buildings and power. London: Routledge.
54. Mol, A. & Law, J. (1994). Regions, networks and fluids: Anemia and social topology. Social Studies of Science, 24, 641 - 671.
55. Mol, A., & Law, J. (2002). Complexities: An introduction. In A. Mol & J. Law (Eds.), Complexities: Social studies of knowledge practices (pp. 1-22). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
56. Mol, A., & Law, J. (2004). Embodied action, enacted bodies: The example of hypoglycaemia. Body & Society, 10 (2-3). 43-62.
57. Oxford English Dictionary (2 nd ed.). (1989). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
58. Paasi, A. (1996). Territories, boundaries and consciousness. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
59. Pels, D., Hetherington, K., & Vandenberghe, F. (2002). The status of the object: Performances, mediations and techniques. Theory, Culture & Society, 19 (5-6). 1-21.
60. Pessoa, F. (2002). The selected prose of Fernando Pessoa. New York: Grove Press.
61. Pollini, G. (1999). Socio-territorial belonging. In R. Gubert (Ed.), Territorial belonging between ecology and culture (pp. 1-34). Trento, Italy: University of Trento.
62. Rapoport, A. (1994). Spatial organisation and the built environment. In T. Ingold (Ed.), Companion encyclopaedia of anthropology (pp. 460-502). London: Routledge.
63. Sack, R. (1986). Human territoriality, its theory and history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
64. Sheller, M. (2004). Mobile publics: Beyond the network perspective. Environment and planning D. Society and Space, 22, 39-52.
65. Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2000). The city and the car. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24, 737-757.
66. Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2003). Mobile transformations of "public" and "private" life. Theory, Culture & Society, 20 (3). 107-125.
67. Shils, E. (1975). Center and periphery. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
68. Soja, E. (1971). The political organization of space. Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers.
69. Soja, E. (1989). Postmodern geographies. London: Verso.
70. Steinbock, A. (1995). Home and beyond. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
71. Vandenberghe, F. (2002). Reconstructing humants: A humanist critique of actant-network theory. Theory, Culture & Society, 19 (5-6). 51 - 67.
72. Warnier, J.-P. (2001). A praxeological approach to subjectivation in a material world. Journal of Material Culture, 6, 5 - 24.
73. Weintraub, J. (1997). The theory and politics of the public/private distinction. In J. Weintraub & K. Kumar (Eds.), Public and private in thought and practice (pp. 1-42). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.