The supreme principle of morality

The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 342-380

  Wood, Allen W ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 60950711696     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CCOL052182303X.011     Document Type: Chapter

References (22)

1. John Stuart, Mill Utilitarianism, ed. George Sher (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1979), p. 24.
2. John Dewey (Human Nature and Conduct [1922] [New York: Random House, 1957], pp. 225–7).
3. H. Stolzenberg and H. F. Fulda, eds., Architektonik und System in der Philosophie Kants (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2001).
4. E. J. F. Payne (New York: Dover, 1958), 1:514–26
5. E. J. F. Payne (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1965), pp. 53–5.
6. Christine Korsgaard, Creating the Kingdom of Ends (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 106–33.
7. Mary Gregor’s (Kant, Practical Philosophy [New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996], p. 85).
8. H. J. Paton, The Categorical Imperative (London: Hutcheson, 1947), p. 130;
9. Onora O’Neill, Constructions of Reason (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), p. 127;
10. Paul Guyer, “The Possibility of the Categorical Imperative,” in Guyer (ed.) Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: Critical Essays (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1998), p. 216.
11. Klaus Reich, “Kant and Greek Ethics II,” Mind 48 (1939), pp. 452–3.
12. A. R. C. Duncan, Practical Reason and Morality (London: Nelson, 1957), pp. 175–82.
13. H. J. Paton, “The Aim and Structure of Kant’s Grundlegung,” Philosophical Quarterly 8 (1958), pp. 112–30.
14. Brendan E. Liddell, Kant on the Foundation of Morality (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1970), pp. 138–40.
15. P. G. Walsh (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).
16. G. E. M. Anscombe, “Modern Moral Philosophy,” Philosophy 33 (1958), reprinted in Roger Crisp and Michael Slote, eds., Virtue Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).
17. Paul Guyer, “Kant’s Deduction of Principles of Right,” in Mark Timmons, ed., Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretive Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 23–64;
18. Bernd Ludwig, “Whence Public Right? The role of Theoretical and Practical Reasoning in Kant’s Doctrine of Right,” in Timmons, ed., Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals, pp. 159–84.
19. Markus Willascheck, “Which Imperatives for Right? On the Non-Prescriptive Character of Juridical Laws in Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals,” pp. 65–88.
20. Thomas Pogge, “Is Kant’s Rechtslehre a “Comprehensive Liberalism’?,” pp. 133–58.
21. L. A Selby-Bigge (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967), p. 461.
22. Stephen Darwall’s excellent book, The British Moralists and the Internal “Ought’ 1640–1740 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995).