Self-reported versus observed classroom activities in elementary general music

Journal of Research in Music Education

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 444-456

  Wang, Cecilia Chu ^a   Sogin, David W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 60950230087     PISSN: 00224294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3345538     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Akel, K. (1994). An investigation of teacher behaviors of non-music majors trained in behavioral observations. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky, 1994). Dissertation Abstracts International, 55, 60A.
2. Baldridge, W. R., II. (1984). A systematic investigation of listening activities in the elementary general music classroom. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32, 79-93.
3. Barbe, W. (1981). What we know about modality strengths. Educational Leadership, 38, 378-380.
4. Bevans, J. (1969). The exceptional child and Orff. Music Educators Journal, 55(7), 41-43, 125-127.
5. Breen, L., & Williams, R. P. (1986, December). The congruence of teacher and student perceptions of classroom teaching activity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Austin, Texas.
6. Broquist, O. (1967). A survey of the attitudes of 2,594 Wisconsin elementary pupils toward their experiences in music (Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, 1961). Dissertation Abstracts International, 22, 1917.
7. Consortium of National Arts Education Association. (1994). National standards for arts education. Reston, VA: Music Educators National Conference.
8. DePugh, D. L. (1988). Characteristics of successful senior high school choral directors in the state of Missouri: A survey of teacher self-perception and student and administrator assessment (Doctoral dissertation, University of New Orleans, 1987). Dissertation Abstracts International, 48, 2568A.
9. Duke, R. A. (1987). Observation of applied music instruction: The perceptions of trained and untrained observers. In C. K. Madsen & C. A. Picket (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 115-124). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
10. Duke, R. A., & Picket, C. A. (1987). The effect of differentially focused observation on evaluation of instruction. Journal of Research in Music Education, 35, 27-37.
11. Forsythe, J. L. (1977). Elementary students attending behavior as a function of classroom activities. Journal of Research in Music Education, 25, 228-239.
12. Gates, C. A. (1993). The effect of perceptual modality on rhythmic achievement and modality preference of first-grade children (Doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky, 1993). Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 855A.
13. Greer, R. D. (1980). Design for music learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
14. Hamann, D. L., & Lawrence, J. E. (1994). University music educators' effectiveness as determined by public school music educators. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 12(2), 21-27.
15. Hamann, D. L., & Lawrence, J. E. (1995). University music educators' perceptions of the importance of public-school-related off-campus activities. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43, 330-341.
16. Hendel, C. (1995). Behavioral characteristics and instructional patterns of selected music teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43, 182-203.
17. Houpy, R. L. (1989). The relationships between a measure of effective teacher behavior and certain supervisor-evaluator and teacher-evaluator characteristics (Doctoral dissertation, University of New Orleans, 1988). Dissertation Abstracts International, 50, 344A.
18. Kuhn, T. L. (1975). The effect of teacher approval and disapproval on attentiveness, musical achievement and attitude of fifth grade students. In C. K. Madsen, R. D. Greer, & C.H. Madsen, Jr. (Eds.), Research in music behavior (pp. 40-48). New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Madsen, C. H., Jr., & Madsen, C. K (1981). Teaching/discipline: A positive approach for educational development, 3rd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
20. Madsen, C. K. (1981). Music lessons and books as reinforcement alternatives. Journal of Research in Music Education, 29, 103-110.
21. Madsen, C. K. (1989, February). Teacher intensity in relationship to music education. Paper presented at the Symposium for Research in General Music, Tucson, AZ.
22. Madsen, C. K., & Duke, R. A. (1985a). Observation of approval/disapproval in music: Perception versus actual classroom events. Journal of Research in Music Education, 33, 205-214.
23. Madsen, C. K., & Duke, R. A. (1985b). Perception of approval/disapproval in music. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 85, 119-130.
24. Madsen, C. K., & Geringer, J. M. (1989). The relationship of teacher on-task to intensity and effective teaching. Canadian Journal of Music Education, 32, 87-94.
25. Madsen, C. K., Stanley, J. M., & Cassidy, J. W. (1989). Demonstration and recognition of high and low contrasts in teacher intensity. Journal of Research in Music Education, 37, 85-92.
26. Martin, M. A. (1993). An examination of the Orff-Schulwerk approach to music education in a public elementary school: A replication study (Doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 1992). Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 2728A.
27. McClellan, N. (1994). Teachers' perceptions of the use and effectiveness of elementary music textbooks in public schools of southwest Missouri. Missouri Journal of Research in Music Education, 31, 29-37.
28. Moore, R. S. (1976). Effect of differential teaching techniques on achievement, attitude, and teaching skills of preservice elementary students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 24, 129-141.
29. Moore, R. S. (1981). Comparative use of teaching time by American and British elementary music specialists. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 66-67, 62-68.
30. Moore, R. S. (1987). Effects of age, sex, and activity on children's attentiveness in elementary school music classes. In C. K. Madsen & C. A. Picket (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 26-31). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
31. Munsen, S. C. (1987). A description and analysis of an Orff Schulwerk program of music education (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1986). Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 3351A.
32. Nolin, W. (1973). Attitudinal growth patterns toward elementary school music experiences. Journal of Research in Music Education, 21, 123-134.
33. Nolin, W. (1988). Patterns of attitudinal development in general music classes. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 7(1), 33-36.
34. Persellin, D. (1988). Music teachers perceived modality preferences compared to methodologies used. Music Education Research Reports (pp. 1-14). Texas Music Educators Association, Austin.
35. Price, H. (1992). Sequential patterns of music instruction and learning to use them. Journal of Research in Music Education, 40, 14-29.
36. Price, H., & Hardin, L. (1988, April). Elementary school teachers' comparative use of class time: Teacher who are versus those who are not Orff Schulwerk certified. Paper presented at the 1988 national convention of Music Educators Conference. Indianapolis, Indiana.
37. Price, H., & Yarbrough, C. (1993, January). Effect of scripted sequential patterns of instruction in music rehearsals on teaching evaluations by college nonmusic majors. Paper presented at the Southern Division of the Music Educators National Conference, Savannah, GA.
38. Reimer, B. (1994). Thinking globally about a research agenda for general music. General Music Today, 7, 3-12.
39. Roeder, J. K. (1993). A comparison of pre-service teacher self-perception: Pre and post student teaching (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Dayton, 1993). Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 900A.
40. Schmidt, C. P. (1989). Individual differences in perception of applied music teaching feedback. Psychology of Music, 17, 110-122.
41. Schmidt, C. P. (1995). Attributions of success, grade level, and gender as factors in choral students' perceptions of teacher feedback. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43, 313-329.
42. Shehan, P. K. (1987). Effects of rote versus note presentations on rhythm learning and retention. Journal of Research in Music Education, 35, 117-126.
43. Siemens, M. T. (1969). A comparison of Orff and traditional instructional methods in music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 17, 272-285.
44. Sims, W. L. (1986). The effect of high versus low teacher affect and passive versus active activity during music listening on preschool children's attention, piece preference, time spent listening, and piece recognition. Journal of Research in Music Education, 34, 173-191.
45. Taebel, D. K. (1990). An assessment of the classroom performance of music teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 5-23.
46. Tinkham, B. S. (1994). The impact of alternative methods of teacher evaluation on teacher perception of organizational climate, teacher instructional practices, and teacher self-perception. (Doctoral dissertation, East Carolina University, 1994). Dissertation Abstracts International, 55, 1165A.
47. Wagner, M., & Strul, E. (1979). Comparisons of beginning versus experienced elementary music educators in use of teaching time. Journal of Research in Music Education, 27, 113-125.
48. Yarbrough, C. (1975). The effect of magnitude of conductor behavior on performance, attentiveness, and attitude of students in selected mixed choruses. Journal of Research in Music Education, 23, 134-146.
49. Yarbrough, C., & Hendel, C. (1993). The effect of sequential patterns on rehearsal evaluations of high school and elementary students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 246-257.
50. Yarbrough, C., & Price, H. (1989). Sequential patterns of instruction in music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 37, 179-187.
51. Yarbrough, C., Price, H. E., & Hendel, C. (1994). The effect of sequential patterns and modes of presentation on the evaluation of music teaching. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 120, 33-45.