Music participation and socioeconomic status as correlates of change: A longitudinal analysis of academic achievement

Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education

Volumn , Issue 172, 2007, Pages 41-57

  Miksza, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 60949657063     PISSN: 00109894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Aguilar, C. (2005). Mandated standardized testing and the curriculum: A survey of middle school music teachers regarding the Indiana statewide testing for educational progress (ISTEP). Unpublished Master's Thesis, Indiana University.
2. Bresler, L. (2002). Research: A foundation for arts education advocacy. In R. Colwell & C. Richardson (Eds. ), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 1066-1083). New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Catterall, J. , Chapleau, R. , & Iwanaga, J. (1999). Involvement in the arts and human development. In E. Fiske (Ed. ), Champions of change: The impact of the arts on learning (pp. 1-18). Washington, DC: The Arts Education Partnership and the President's Committee on the Arts and the Humanities.
4. Chabris, C. F. (1999). Prelude or requium for the "Mozart effect?" Nature, 400, 826-827.
5. Costa-Giomi, E. (2004). Effects of three years of piano instruction on children's academic achievement, school performance and self-esteem. Psychology of music, 32(2), 139-152.
6. Curtin, T. R. , Ingels, S. J. , Wu, S. , & Heuer, R. (2002). National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988: Base-Year to Foutth Follow-up Data File User's Manual (NCES 2002-323). Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
7. Embretson, S. E. , & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory fir psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
8. Gardner, H. (1999). Keynote address: Is musical intelligence special? Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 142, 9-21.
9. Good, J. (1997). Measuring musical aptitude in children: On the role of age, handedness, scholastic achievement, and socioeconomic status. Psychology of Music, 25(1), 57-69.
10. Karney, B. R. , & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). Assessing longitudinal change in marriage: An introduction to longitudinal growth curves. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 1091-1108.
11. Klinedinst, R. E. (1991). Predicting performance achievement and retention of fifth-grade instrumental students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 39(3), 225-238.
12. Klinedinst, R. E. (1992). Predicting performance achievement of beginning band students: Second year results. Contributions to Music Education, 19, 46-59.
13. Maas, C. J. M, & Snijders, T. A. (2003). The multilevel approach to repeated measures for complete and incomplete data. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 37(1), 71-89.
14. Mark, M. L. (2002). Nonmusical outcomes of music education: Historical considerations. In R. Colwell, & C. Richardson (Eds. ), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 1045-1052). NY: Oxford University Press.
15. Morrison, S. (2000). Does music make you smarter? Music Educators Journal, 87(2), 33-39.
16. Nantais, K. M. & Schellenberg, E. G. (1999). The Mozart effect: An artifact of preference. Psychological Science, 10(4), 370-373.
17. Raudenbush, S. W. , & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchal linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed. ). Dallas, Texas: Sage Publications.
18. Raudenbush, S. W. , Bryk, A. S. , & Congdon, R. (2000). HLM6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, Illinois: Scientific Software International, Inc.
19. Rauscher, E H. , & Shaw, G. L. (1998). Key components of the Mozart effect. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 835-841.
20. Rauscher, E H. , Shaw, G. L. , & Ky, K. N. (1993). Music and spatial task performance. Nature, 365, 611.
21. Rauscher, F. H. , Shaw, G. L. , & Ky, K. N. (1995). Listening to Mozart enhances spatial reasoning: Towards a neurophysiological basis. Neuroscience Letters, 185, 44-47.
22. Reimer, B. & Fonder, M. (1999). Facing the risks of the "Mozart effect. " Music Educators Journal, 86(1), 37-43.
23. Rock, D. A. , Pollack, J. M. , & Quinn P. (1995). Psychometric Report for the NELS:88 Base Year Through Second Follow-Up. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics.
24. Schafer, J. L. , & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147-177.
25. Schellenberg, G. (2001). Music and nonmusical abilities. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 930, 355-371.
26. Schellenberg, E. G. (2004). Music lessons enhance IQ. Psychological science: A Journal of the American Psychological Society, 15(8), 511-514.
27. Singer, J. D. , & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. NY: Oxford University Press.
28. Steele, K. M. , Bass K. E. , & Crook, M. D. (1999). The mystery of the Mozart effect: Failure to replicate. Psychological Science, 10(4), 366-369.
29. Winner, E. & Cooper, M. (2000). Mute those claims: No evidence (yet) for a causal link between arts study and academic achievement. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3/4), 11-75.