Intentions and trolleys

Philosophical Quarterly

Volumn 56, Issue 222, 2006, Pages 63-83

  Shaw, Joseph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 60949466106     PISSN: 00318094     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2005.00429.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. See J.J. Thomson, 'Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem', in J.M. Fischer and M. Ravizza (eds), Ethics: Problems and Principles (Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1992), pp. 67-77, at p. 71
2. cf. P. Unger, Living High and Letting Die: Our Illusion of Innocence (Oxford UP, 1996), p. 90
3. See P. Foot, 'The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect', in B. Steinbock and A. Norcross (eds), Killing and Letting Die (Fordham UP, 1994), pp. 266-79, at p. 275
4. Thomson, 'The Trolley Problem', in Fischer and Ravizza (eds), Ethics, pp. 279-92, at p. 282
5. J.M. Fischer, 'Tooley and the Trolley', Philosophical Studies, 69 (1991), pp. 93-100, at pp. 94-5
6. cf. B. Russell, 'On the Relative Strictness of Negative and Positive Duties', American Philosophical Quarterly, 14 (1977), pp. 87-97, at pp. 95-6
7. See J. Finnis, 'The Rights and Wrongs of Abortion: a Reply to Judith Thomson', Philosophy and Public Affairs, 2 (1973), pp. 117-45, at p. 130
8. C. Fried, Right and Wrong (Harvard UP, 1978), p. 20
9. See F.M. Kamm, 'The Doctrine of Triple Effect', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supp. Vol. 74 (2000), pp. 21-39, at p. 23
10. See D.B. Marquis, 'Four Versions of Double Effect', in P.A. Woodward (ed.), The Doctrine of Double Effect (Univ. of Notre Dame Press, 2001), pp. 156-85, at pp. 175-6
11. See J. Harris, 'The Survival Lottery', in Steinbock and Norcross (eds), Killing and Letting Die, pp. 257-65, at p. 264
12. Thomson, 'Killing, Letting Die', p. 75
13. E.g., Foot, 'The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect', in Steinbock and Norcross (eds), Killing and Letting Die, pp. 266-79, at p. 274
14. W. Quinn, 'Actions, Intentions, and Consequences: the Doctrine of Double Effect', in Quinn and Foot (eds), Morality and Action (Cambridge UP, 1993), pp. 175-93, at pp. 183-4
15. Marquis, 'Four Versions', p. 177
16. See G.E.M. Anscombe, 'Medallist's Address: Action, Intention, and Double Effect', in Woodward (ed.), The Doctrine of Double Effect, pp. 50-66, at p. 58
17. See N. Delaney, 'To Double Business Bound: Reflections on the Doctrine of Double Effect', American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 75 (2001), pp. 561-83
18. G. Williams, The Mental Element in Crime (Jerusalem: Magnes Press, 1965), p. 13
19. cf. Russell, 'On the Relative Strictness of Negative and Positive Duties', p. 95
20. See H. Davis, Moral and Pastoral Theology, Vol. 11: Precepts, 3rd edn (London: Sheed and Ward, 1938), p. 156
21. cf. Anscombe, 'Medallist's Address', p. 59
22. D.S. Oderberg, Moral Theory: a Non-Consequentialist Approach (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000), p. 78
23. P. Ramsey, War and the Christian Conscience (Duke UP, 1961), p. 184
24. M. Costa, 'The Trolley Problem Revisited', in Fischer and Ravizza (eds), Ethics, pp. 293-302, at p. 300
25. See J.L.A. Garcia, 'The New Critique of Anti-Consequentialist Moral Theory', Philosophical Studies, 71 (1993), pp. 1-32, at p. 2
26. Fried, Right and Wrong, pp. 30-2
27. Costa, 'The Trolley Problem Revisited', p. 300
28. Quinn, 'Actions, Intentions and Consequences: the Doctrine of Doing and Allowing', in Quinn and Foot (eds), pp. 149-74, at p. 168
29. M. Hanser, 'Killing, Letting Die and Preventing People from being Saved', Utilitas, 11 (1999), pp. 277-95
30. See S. Kagan, The Limits of Morality (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989), p. 129
31. K. Lippert-Rasmussen, 'Moral Status and the Impermissibility of Minimizing Violations', Philosophy and Public Affairs, 25 (1996), pp. 333-51, at p. 335, fn. 9
32. See Kamm, Morality, Mortality (Oxford UP, 1993), p. 195
33. cf. Kagan, The Limits of Morality, p. 168
34. A. Mclntyre, 'Doing Away with Double Effect', Ethics, 111 (2001), pp. 219-55, at pp. 228, 241
35. See Thomson, 'The Trolley Problem', p. 284
36. Kamm, 'The Doctrine of Triple Effect', pp. 24, 26
37. J. Shaw, 'Intention in Ethics', Canadian Journal of Philosophy (forthcoming), part 3(a)
38. T.M. Scanlon, 'Intention and Permissibility', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supp. Vol. 74 (2000), pp. 301-17, at p. 306
39. A.J.P. Kenny, 'Intention and Purpose in Law', in R.S. Summers (ed.), Essays in Legal Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell, 1968), pp. 146-63, at p. 156
40. See J. Dancy, 'Scanlon's Principles', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supp. Vol. 74 (2000), pp. 319-38, at p. 334
41. Pace Mclntyre, 'Doing Away with Double Effect', p. 228
42. Pace J. Harris, 'The Moral Difference between Throwing a Trolley at a Person and Throwing a Person at a Trolley: a Reply to Kamm', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supp. Vol. 74 (2000), pp. 41-57, at p. 50
43. See Foot, 'The Problem of Abortion', p. 267
44. Abelard, Ethical Writings: his Ethics or Know Yourself and his Dialogue between a Philosopher, a Jew, and a Christian, tr. P. V. Spade (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1995), 'Ethics', I §58 pp. 12-13