What is moral inquiry?

Proceedings of the Aristotelean Society, Supplementary Volumes

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 63-81

  Lenman, James ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 60949392523     PISSN: 03097013     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8349.2007.00151.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Adams, R. M. 1999: Finite and Infinite Goods: A Framework for Ethics (New York: Oxford University Press).
2. Audi, R. 1996: 'Intuitionism, Pluralism and the Foundations of Ethics', in W Sinnott-Armstrong and M. Timmons (eds.), Moral Knowledge? New Readings in Moral Epistemology (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 101-36.
3. Blackburn, S. 1984: Spreading the Word: Groundings in the Philosophy of Language (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
4. - 1993: Essays in Quasi-Realism (New York: Oxford University Press).
5. - 1998: Ruling Passions: A Theory of Practical Reason (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
6. Boyd, R. 1988: 'How to Be a Moral Realist', in G. Sayre-McCord (ed.), Essays on Moral Realism (Ithaca: Cornell University Press), pp. 181-228.
7. - 2003a: 'Finite Beings, Finite Goods: The Semantics, Metaphysics and Ethics of Naturalist Consequentialism, Part I', Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 66, pp. 505-53.
8. - 2003b: 'Finite Beings, Finite Goods: The Semantics, Metaphysics and Ethics of Naturalist Consequentialism, Part II', Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 67, pp. 24-47.
9. Brandt, R. 1979: A Theory of the Good and the Right (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
10. Bratman, M. 2004: 'Planning Agency, Autonomous Agency', in J. S. Taylor (ed.), Personal Autonomy: New Essays on Personal Autonomy and Its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 33-57.
11. Brink, D. 1989: Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
12. DePaul, M. R. 1993: Balance and Refinement: Beyond Coherence Methods of Moral Inquiry (London: Routledge).
13. - 1998: 'Why Bother With Reflective Equilibrium?', in M. R. DePaul and W Ramsey (eds.), Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield), pp. 293-309.
14. Dwyer, S. 1999: 'Moral Competence', in K. Murasugi and R. Stainton (eds.), Philosophy and Linguistics (Boulder, CO: Westview), pp. 169-90.
15. Frankfurt, H. 2006: Taking Ourselves Seriously and Getting It Right (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
16. Gibbard, A. 2002: 'The Reasons of a Living Being', Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 76, pp. 49-60.
17. - 2003: Thinking How to Live (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
18. Hare, R. M. 1971: 'The Argument from Received Opinion', in his Essays on Philosophical Method (London: Macmillan), pp. 117-35.
19. - 1981: Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method and Point (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
20. - 1989: 'Rawls's Theory of Justice', in Norman Daniels (ed.), Reading Rawls: Critical Studies on Rawls's A Theory of Justice (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press), pp. 81-107.
21. Harman, G. 1986: 'Moral Explanations of Natural Facts: Can Moral Claims Be Tested Against Moral Reality?', Southern Journal of Philosophy, 24 (supplement), pp. 57-68.
22. - 2000: 'Moral Philosophy and Linguistics', in his Explaining Value (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp. 217-26.
23. Hooker, B. 2000: Ideal Code, Real World (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
24. Kagan, S. 1998: Normative Ethics (Boulder, CO: Westview Press).
25. - 2001: 'Thinking About Cases', in Social Philosophy and Policy, 18, pp. 44-63.
26. Kornblith, H. 1998: 'The Role of Intuition in Philosophical Inquiry', in M. R. DePaul and W Ramsey (eds.), Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield), pp. 129-41.
27. Lenman, J. 2003: 'Disciplined Syntacticism and Moral Expressivism', Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 66, pp. 32-57.
28. Mikhail, J. 2000: Rawls's Linguistic Analogy: A Study of the 'Generative Grammar' Model of Moral Theory Described by John Rawls in A Theory of Justice (PhD Dissertation, Cornell University).
29. Parfit, D. 2006: 'Normativity', in R. Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 1 (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp. 325-80.
30. Prichard, H. A. 1968: Moral Obligation and Duty and Interest: Essays and Lectures (London: Oxford University Press).
31. Prinz, J. forthcoming: 'Is Morality Innate?', in W. Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology, Volume 1: The Evolution of Morality (Cambridge, MA; MIT Press, 2007).
32. Rawls, J. 1951: 'Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics', Philosophical Review, 60, pp. 177-97;
33. reprinted in his Collected Papers, ed. S. Freeman (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 1-19.
34. - 1972: A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Clarendon Press; rev. edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).
35. - 1993: Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press).
36. Ross, W. D. 1930: The Right and the Good (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
37. Scanlon, T. M. 1992: 'The Aims and Authority of Moral Theory', Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 12, 1-23.
38. - 1998: What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
39. - 2003: 'Metaphysics and Morals', Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 77, pp. 7-22.
40. Shafer-Landau, R. 2003: Moral Realism: A Defence (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
41. Sinclair, N. 2006: 'The Moral Belief Problem', Ratio, 19, pp. 249-60.
42. Singer, P. 1974: 'Sidgwick and Reflective Equilibrium', Monist, 57.
43. Timmons, M. 2002: Moral Theory: An Introduction (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield).
44. Walzer, M. 1987: Interpretation and Social Criticism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
45. Watson, G. 1975: 'Free Agency', Journal of Philosophy, 72, pp. 205-20.
46. Williams, B. 1985: Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (London: Fontana/Collins).
47. Wright, C. 1992: Truth and Objectivity (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).