메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 22, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 35-64

Evading the issue: The strategy of Kierkegaard's postscript

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 60949339466     PISSN: 01900536     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9205.00083     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (5)

References (5)
  • 1
    • 0003647436 scopus 로고
    • edited and translated by H. Hong and E. Hong, Princeton
    • All references are to S. Kierkegaard, Concluding Unscientific Postscript, edited and translated by H. Hong and E. Hong, Princeton, 1992
    • (1992) Concluding Unscientific Postscript
    • Kierkegaard, S.1
  • 2
    • 79954634686 scopus 로고
    • Bucknell
    • What follows is indebted to the account of the nature of Kierkegaard's pseudonymous authorship James Conant has developed in a series of recent papers. I hope to further the cause of its acceptance by offering a description of the strategy of CUP in rather more detail than Conant, for the purposes of his papers, needed to do, although I do not know to what extent he would agree with what I say. Cf.: 'Must We Show What We Cannot Say?', in R. Fleming and M. Payne (eds), The Sense of Stanley Cavell (Bucknell, 1989)
    • (1989) The Sense of Stanley Cavell
    • Fleming, R.1    Payne, M.2
  • 4
    • 67349273515 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Putting Two and Two Together
    • London
    • 'Putting Two and Two Together', in T. Tessin and M. von der Ruhr (eds), Philosophy and the Grammar of Religious Belief (London, 1996). I would like to express my gratitude to my colleague Stephen Mulhall for bringing these papers to my attention and for his forceful advocacy of the position they propose
    • (1996) Philosophy and the Grammar of Religious Belief
    • Tessin, T.1    Ruhr Der M.Von2
  • 5
    • 0004315636 scopus 로고
    • This is why Kierkegaard uses the pseudonyms. To dispel an illusion, it must first be assumed. But Kierkegaard himself does not live in the illusions, and so they must be assumed in another guise. 'One will perceive the significance of the pseudonyms and why I must be pseudonymous in relation to all aesthetic productions, because I led my life in entirely different categories and understood from the beginning that this productivity was of an interim nature, a deceit, a necessary process of elimination' (The Point of view for My Work as an Author, ed. B. Nelson, Harper, 1962, pp. 85-6)
    • (1962) The Point of view for My Work as an Author , pp. 85-86
    • Nelson, B.1    Harper2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.