Quantifiers and 'if'-clauses

Philosophical Quarterly

Volumn 48, Issue 191, 1998, Pages 209-214

  Von Fintel, Kai ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 60949254896     PISSN: 00318094     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9213.00095     Document Type: Note

References (24)

1. S. Barker, 'Material Implication and General Indicative Conditionals', The Philosophical Quarterly, 47 (1997), pp. 195-211
2. P. Geach, Reference and Generality (Cornell UP, 1962)
3. D. Lewis, 'Adverbs of Quantification', in E. Keenan (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language (Cambridge UP, 1975), pp. 3-15
4. A. Kratzer, 'Conditionals', in A. von Stechow and D. Wunderlich (eds), Semantik: ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung (Amsterdam: de Gruyter, 1991), pp. 651-6
5. I. Heim, The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases (New York: Garland, 1988)
6. For a proof, see, e.g., J. Barwise and R. Cooper, 'Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language', Linguistics and Philosophy, 4 (1981), pp. 159-219
7. A. Mostowski, 'On a Generalization of Quantifiers', Fundamenta Mathematica, 44 (1957), pp. 12-36
8. N. Rescher, 'Plurality-Quantification', Journal of Symbolic Logic, 27 (1962), p. 374
9. J. Altham and N. Tennant, 'Sortal Quantification', in E. Keenan (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language (Cambridge UP, 1975), pp. 46-58
10. G. Evans, 'Pronouns, Quantifiers, and Relative Clauses (II)', Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 7 (1977), pp. 777-98
11. P. Geach, 'Quine's Syntactical Insights', in his Logic Matters (Oxford: Blackwell, 1972), pp. 115-27, at p. 125
12. S. Read, 'Conditionals are not Truth-Functional: an Argument from Peirce', Analysis, 51 (1992), pp. 5-12
13. See C.S. Peirce, Collected Papers, ed. Hartshorne and Weiss (MIT PRess, 1931-58) Vol. IV, §§546, 580
14. B. Gillon, 'Peirce's Challenge to Material Implication as a Model of If', Analysis, 55 (1995) pp. 280-2
15. J. Higginbotham, 'Linguistic Theory and Davidson's Program in Semantics', in E. LePore (ed.), Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson (Oxford: Blackwell, 1986), pp. 29-48
16. J. Pelletier, 'On an Argument against Semantic Compositionality', in D. Westerståhl (ed.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science (Amsterdam: Kluwer, 1994), pp. 599-610
17. T. Janssen, 'Compositionality', in. J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds), Handbook of Logic and Language (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1997), pp. 417-73
18. P. Bosch, Agreement and Anaphora: a Study of the Role of Pronouns in Syntax and Discourse (London: Academic Press, 1983), esp. pp. 133-41
19. N. Belnap, 'Conditional Assertion and Restricted Quantification', Noûs, 4 (1970), pp. 1-12
20. and 'Restricted Quantification and Conditional Assertion', in H. Leblanc (ed.), Truth, Syntax and Modality: Proceedings of the Temple University Conference on Alternative Semantics (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1973), pp. 48-75
21. N. Chomsky, 'Conditions on Rules of Grammar', Linguistic Analysis, 2 (1976), pp. 303-51
22. G. Evans, 'Pronouns', Linguistic Inquiry, 11 (1980), pp. 337-62
23. C. Roberts, 'Modal Subordination and Pronominal Anaphora in Discourse', Linguistics and Philosophy, 12 (1989), pp. 683-721
24. See for such an analysis M. Poesio and A. Zucchi, 'On Telescoping', SALT II: Proceedings of the Second Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory (Ohio State Univ. Dept of Linguistics, 1992), pp. 347-66