Improving the environmental performance of the fishing fleet by use of Quality Function Deployment (QFD)

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 17, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 724-731

  Utne, Ingrid Bouwer ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Fishing fleet; Quality Function Deployment (QFD); Systems engineering

Indexed keywords

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FISHERIES; FISHING VESSELS; FLEET OPERATIONS; LIFE CYCLE; QUALITY CONTROL; SHIPS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; FISHERIES MANAGEMENTS; FISHING FLEET; LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS; LIFE-CYCLE COSTS; LIFE-CYCLE STAGES; SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES; SYSTEM DESIGNS; SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS;

QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT;

EID: 60949109176     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Utenriksdepartementet (The Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs). Nasjonal strategi for bærekraftig utvikling [National strategy on sustainable development]; 2002 [in Norwegian].
2. The Office of the Auditor General. Riksrevisjonens undersøkelse av forvaltning av fiskeriressursene (The Office of the Auditor General's evaluation of the management of the fish resources). dokument nr. 3:13 (2003-2004). www.riksrevisjonen.no [accessed 30.06.05] [in Norwegian]
3. Hough A. Pre assessment report for Norwegian whitefish fisheries (2004), Moody Marine Ltd.
4. Utne I.B. Systems engineering principles in fisheries management. Marine Policy 30 (2006) 624-634
5. Utne I.B. System evaluation of sustainability in the Norwegian cod-fisheries. Marine Policy 31 (2007) 390-401
6. Blanchard B.S., and Fabrycky W.J. Systems engineering and analysis (1998), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J., U.S.A.
7. Zhang Y., Wang H.P., and Zhang C. Green QFD-II: a life cycle approach for environmentally conscious manufacturing by integrating LCA and LCC into QFD matrices. International Journal of Production Research 37 5 (1999) 1075-1091
8. Mehta C., and Wang B. Green Quality Function Deployment III: a methodology for developing environmentally conscious products. Design Manufacturing 4 1 (2001) 1-16
9. Masui K.S., Kobayashi T., and Inaba A. Applying Quality Function Deployment to environmentally conscious design. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 20 1 (2003) 90-106
10. Ernzer M, Mattheir C, Birkhofer H. EI2QFD - an integrated QFD approach or from the results of eco-indicator 99 to Quality Function Deployment. In: EcoDesign 2003: third international symposium on environmentally conscious design and inverse manufacturing, 2003, Tokyo, Japan; 2003.
11. Shenhar A. Systems engineering management: a framework for the development of a multidisciplinary discipline. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 24 2 (1994) 327-332
12. International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE). Systems engineering handbook v3. A guide for system life cycle processes and activities. Incose-tp-2003-002-03 (2006), INCOSE, Seattle, WA, U.S.A.
13. Fet AM. Systems engineering. Environmental management tools and their application in industrial ecology. In: NORSEC fall meeting, Trondheim, Norway; 1999.
14. Blanchard B.S. System engineering management (2004), John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New Jersey
15. Cohen L. Quality Function Deployment. How to make QFD work for you (1995), Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, MA, U.S.A.
16. Chan L., and Wu M. A systematic approach to quality function deployment with a full illustrative example. Omega. The International Journal of Management Science 33 (2005) 119-139
17. Halog A., Schultmann F., and Rentz O. Using quality function deployment for technique selection for optimum environmental performance improvement. Journal of Cleaner Production 9 (2001) 387-394
18. PRé Consultants. Eco-indicator 99 methodology (1999). www.pre.nl [accessed 20.04.07]
19. Baumann H., and Gluch P. The life cycle costing (LCC) approach: a conceptual discussion of its usefulness for environmental decision-making. Building and Environment 39 (2004) 571-580
20. Reenaas M. Solide oxide fuel cell combined with gas turbine versus diesel engine as auxiliary power producing unit onboard a passenger ferry: a comparative life cycle assessment and life cycle cost assessment. Master's thesis. Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Industrial Ecology Programme; 2005.
21. Reich M.C. Economic assessment of municipal waste management systems - case studies using a combination of life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC). Journal of Cleaner Production 13 (2005) 253-263
22. Ellingsen H., Fet A.M., and Aanondsen S. Tools for environmental efficient ship design (2002), ENSUS, Newcastle, U.K.
23. Fabrycky W.J., and Blanchard B.S. Life-cycle cost and economic analysis (1991), Prentice Hall, New Jersey
24. Mihelcic J.R., Crittenden J.C., Small M.J., Shonnard D.R., Hokanson D.R., Zhang Q., et al. Sustainability science and engineering: the emergence of a new metadiscipline. Environmental Science and Technology 37 (2003) 5314-5324
25. Saaty T.L., and Kearns K.P. Analytical planning: the organization of systems (1985), Pergamon Press, Oxford
26. Ellingsen H., and Aanondsen S.A. Environmental impacts of wild caught cod and farmed salmon - a comparison with chicken. International Journal of LCA 11 (2006) 60-65
27. Endal A. Forprosjektering av fiskefartøy under kvoteregimer (Pre-engineering of fishing vessel under quota regimes). Compendium, TMR 4135 (1996), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) [in Norwegian]
28. Hari A.J.E., Kasser, and Weiss M.P. How lessons learned from using QFD led to the evolution of a process for creating quality requirements for complex systems. Systems Engineering 10 1 (2007) 45-63
29. x-reducing efforts within the energy constructions offshore, in domestic shipping, and in the continental industries]. Technical Report TA-2155/2006; 2006 [in Norwegian].