Bounds for quantities of interest and adaptivity in the element-free Galerkin method

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 76, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1782-1818

  Vidal, Yolanda ^a   Parés, Núria ^a   Díez, Pedro ^a   Huerta, Antonio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Adaptivity; Element free Galerkin; Engineering outputs; Error estimation; Functional outputs; Goal oriented error estimation; Mesh free; Residual based estimators

Indexed keywords

CONTROL THEORY; CRACK INITIATION; DOMAIN DECOMPOSITION METHODS; ERROR ANALYSIS; GALERKIN METHODS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

ADAPTIVITY; ELEMENT-FREE GALERKIN; ENGINEERING OUTPUTS; ERROR ESTIMATION; FUNCTIONAL OUTPUTS; GOAL-ORIENTED ERROR ESTIMATION; MESH-FREE; RESIDUAL-BASED ESTIMATORS;

COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS;

EID: 60949085464     PISSN: 00295981     EISSN: 10970207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nme.2380     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Paraschivoiu M, Peraire J, Patera AT. A posteriori finite element bounds for linear-functional outputs of elliptic partial differential equations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1997; 150(1-4):289-312. Symposium on Advances in Computational Mechanics, vol. 2, Austin, TX, 1997.
2. Ainsworth M, Oden JT. A Posteriori Error Estimation in Finite Element Analysis. Wiley: Chichester, 2000.
3. Oden JT, Prudhomme S. Goal-oriented error estimation and adaptivity for the finite element method. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 2001; 41(5-6):735-756.
4. Babuska I, Strouboulis T. The Finite Element Method and its Reliability. Numerical Mathematics and Scientific Computation. Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press: New York, 2001.
5. Bonet J, Huerta A, Peraire J. The efficient computation of bounds for functionals of finite element solutions in large strain elasticity. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2002; 191(43):4807-4826.
6. Sauer-Budge AM, Bonet J, Huerta A, Peraire J. Computing bounds for linear functionals of exact weak solutions to Poisson's equation. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 2004; 42(4):1610-1630.
7. Parés N, Bonet J, Huerta A, Peraire J. The computation of bounds for linear-functional outputs of weak solutions to the two-dimensional elasticity equations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2006; 194(4-6):406-429.
8. Parés N, Díez P, Huerta A. Bounds of functional outputs for parabolic problems. Part I: exact bounds of the discontinuous Galerkin time discretization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2008; 197(19-20):1641-1660.
9. Parés N, Díez P, Huerta A. Bounds of functional outputs for parabolic problems. Part II: bounds of the exact solution. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2008; 197(19-20):1661-1679.
10. Ladevèze P, Leguillon D. Error estimate procedure in the finite element method and applications. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 1983; 20(3):485-509.
11. Carstensen C, Funken SA. Fully reliable localized error control in the FEM. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 1999; 21(4):1465-1484 (electronic).
12. Machiels L, Maday Y, Patera AT. A 'flux-free' nodal Neumann subproblem approach to output bounds for partial differential equations. Comptes Rendus de l Academie des Sciences de Paris Serie I - Mathematique 2000; 330(3):249-254.
13. Morin P, Nochetto RH, Siebert KG. Local problems on stars: a posteriori error estimators, convergence, and performance. Mathematics of Computation 2003; 72(243):1067-1097.
14. Parés N, Díez P, Huerta A. Subdomain-based flux-free a posteriori error estimators. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2006; 195(4-6):297-323.
15. Duarte CA, Oden JT. An h-p adaptive method using clouds. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1996; 139(1-4):237-262.
16. Liu WK, Jun S, Sihling DT, Chen Y, Hao W. Multiresolution reproducing kernel particle method for computational fluid dynamics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1997; 24:1391-1415.
17. Chung HJ, Belytschko T. An error estimate in the EFG method. Computational Mechanics 1998; 21(2):91-100.
18. Gavete L, Cuesta JL, Ruiz A. A procedure for approximation of the error in the EFG method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2002; 53:667-690.
19. Strouboulis T, Zhang L, Wang D, Babuska I. A posteriori error estimation for generalized finite element methods. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2006; 195(9-12):852-879.
20. Maday Y, Patera AT, Peraire J. A general formulation for a posteriori bounds for output functionals of partial differential equations; application to the eigenvalue problem. Comptes Rendus de l Academie des Sciences de Paris, Serie I - Mathematique 1999; 328(9):823-828.
21. Prudhomme S, Oden JT. On goal-oriented error estimation for elliptic problems: application to the control of pointwise errors. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1999; 176(1-4):313-331. New Advances in Computational Methods, Cachan, 1997.
22. Patera AT, Peraire J. A general Lagrangian formulation for the computation of a posteriori finite element bounds. Error Estimation and Adaptive Discretization Methods in Computational Fluid Dynamics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Engineering, vol. 25. Springer: Berlin, 2003; 159-206.
23. Xuan ZC, Parés N, Peraire J. Computing upper and lower bounds for the J-integral in two-dimensional linear elasticity. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2006; 195(4-6):430-443.
24. Fernández-Méndez S, Huerta A. Imposing essential boundary conditions in mesh-free methods. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2004; 193(12-14):1257-1275.
25. Huerta A, Fernández-Méndez S. Enrichment and coupling of the finite element and meshless methods. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2000; 48(11):1615-1636.
26. Huerta A, Fernández-Méndez S, Liu WK. A comparison of two formulations to blend finite elements and mesh-free methods. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2004; 193(12-14):1105-1117.
27. Fernández-Méndez S, Bonet J, Huerta A. Continuous blending of SPH with finite elements. Computers and Structures 2005; 83(17-18):1448-1458.
28. Nitsche J. über ein variations zur lösung von dirichlet-problemen bei verwendung von teilräumen die keinen randbedingungen unterworfen sind. Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universitat Hamburg 1970; 36:9-15.
29. Stenberg R. On some techniques for approximating boundary conditions in the finite element method. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 1995; 63(1-3):139-148.
30. Becker R. Mesh adaptation for Dirichlet flow control via Nitsche's method. Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering 2002; 18(9):669-680.
31. Griebel M, Schweitzer MA. A particle-partition of unity method. Part V: boundary conditions. In Geometric Analysis and Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations, Hildebrandt S, Karcher H (eds). Springer: Berlin, 2002; 517-540.
32. Díez P, Calderón G. Remeshing criteria and proper error representations for goal oriented h-adaptivity. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2007; 196(4-6):719-733.
33. Liu WK, Li S, Belytschko T. Moving least square reproducing kernel methods Part I: methodology and convergence. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1997; 143(1-2):113-154.
34. Oñate E, Bugeda G. A study of mesh optimality criteria in adaptive finite element analysis. Engineering Computations 1993; 10:307-321.
35. Díez P, Parés N, Huerta A. Recovering lower bounds of the error by postprocessing implicit residual a posteriori error estimates. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2003; 56(10):1465-1488.