Domestic well capture zone and influence of the gravel pack length

Ground Water

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 277-286

  Horn, Judith E ^a   Harter, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLUVIAL AQUIFERS; ANALYTICAL MODELS; CAPTURE ZONES; CORRECTION FACTORS; DOMESTIC WELLS; GRAVEL PACKS; GROUND WATERS; HIGH RESOLUTIONS; INTAKE SCREENS; NUMERICAL RESULTS; SHALLOW DEPTHS; SHALLOW WELLS; SOURCE AREAS; STATISTICAL REGRESSIONS; WATER SOURCES; WELL SCREENS;

AQUIFERS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GROUNDWATER RESOURCES; HYDROGEOLOGY; WATER WELLS; WELLS;

GRAVEL;

FRESH WATER;

AQUIFER; ESTIMATION METHOD; GRAVEL; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; INFLOW; PERMEABILITY; SHALLOW WATER; WATER DEPTH; WELL;

ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; THEORETICAL MODEL; WATER FLOW; WATER SUPPLY;

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FRESH WATER; MODELS, THEORETICAL; WATER MOVEMENTS; WATER SUPPLY;

EID: 60849133652     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: 17456584     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2008.00521.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Belitz, K., and S.P. Phillips. 1995. Alternative to agriculture drains in California's San Joanquin Valley: Results of a regional-scale hydrogeologic approach. Water Resources Research 31, no. 8 : 1845 1862.
2. Burow, K.R., J.L. Shelton, J.A. Hevesi, and G.S. Weissmann. 2004. Hydrogeologic characterization of the Modesto area, San Joaquin Valley, California. USGS Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5232. Reston, Virginia : USGS.
3. California DHS. 1999. Drinking Water Source Assessment and Protection (DWSAP) Program. Sacramento, California : Division of Drinking Water and Environmental Management, California Department of Health Services. http://www.dhs.ca.gov/ps/ddwem/dwsap/DWSAPindex.htm (accessed August 10, 2007).
4. Garg, S.P., and J. Lal. 1971. Rational design of well screens. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Division, ASCE 97, no. 1 : 24 35.
5. Harter, T. 2008. Delineation of wellhead protection areas. In Watersheds, Groundwater, and Drinking Water: A Practical Guide, ed. T. Harter and L. Rollins, 274. Davis, California : University of California, UC ANR Communications Services Publication 3497.
6. Houben, G.H. 2006. The influence of well hydraulics on the spatial distribution of well incrustations. Ground Water 44, no. 4 : 668 675.
7. McCray, J.E., S.L. Kirkland, R.L. Siegrist, and G.D. Thyne. 2005. Model parameters for simulating fate and transport of on-site wastewater nutrients. Ground Water 43, no. 4 : 628 629.
8. McDonald, M.G., and A.W. Harbaugh. 1988. Techniques of water-resources investigation of the United States Geological Survey. USGS Open-File Report 83-875. Reston, Virginia : USGS.
9. Nahrgang, G. 1954. Zur Theorie des vollkommenen und unvollkommenen Brunnens. Berlin, Germany : Springer Verlag.
10. Phillips, S.P., C.T. Green, K.R. Burow, J.L. Shelton, and D.L. Rewis. 2007. Simulation of ground-water flow in part of the Northeastern San Joaquin Valley, California. USGS Scientific Investigations Report. SIR 2007-5009. Reston, Virginia : USGS.
11. Pollock, D.W. 1994. User's guide for MODPATH/MODPATH-PLOT, Version 3: A particle tracking post-processing package for MODFLOW, the U.S. Geological Survey finite-difference ground-water flow model. USGS Open-File Report 94-464. Reston, Virginia : USGS.
12. Todd, D.K. 1980. Ground Water Hydrology, 2nd ed. New York : John Wiley and Sons.
13. U.S. EPA. 1997. Response to Congress on Use of Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Systems. Washington, DC : Office of Water, U.S. EPA.
14. VonHofe, F., and O.J. Helweg. 1998. Modeling well hydrodynamics. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering ASCE 124, no. 12 : 1198 1202.