Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Breast Imaging

Journal of Radiology Nursing

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 3-11

  O'Connell, Avice M ^a   Conover, David L ^a   Linda Lin, Chuen Fu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast imaging; Cone beam

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONE BEAM COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; DIGITAL IMAGING; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOSENSITIVITY; SCINTIMAMMOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 60849131511     PISSN: 15460843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jradnu.2008.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2007. Retrieved from (2007). http://www.cancer.org/docroot/STT/STT_0.asp November 15, 2007
2. Berg W.A., Blume J.D., Cormack J.B., Mendelson E.B., Lehrer D., Bohm-Velez M., et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs. mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association 299 18 (2008) 2151-2163
3. Berg W.A., Gutierrez L., NessAiver M.S., Carter W.B., Bhargavan M., Lewis R.S., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233 3 (2004) 830-849
4. Bird R.E., Wallace T.W., and Yankaskas B.C. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 184 3 (1992) 613-617
5. Boetes C., Mus R.D., Holland R., Barentsz J.O., Strijk S.P., Wobbes T., et al. Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology 197 3 (1995) 743-747
6. Boone J.M., Kwan A.L., Seibert J.A., Shah N., Lindfors K.K., and Nelson T.R. Technique factors and their relationship to radiation dose in pendant geometry breast CT. Medica Physica 32 12 (2005) 3767-3776
7. Boyce J. Cornell University Program on breast cancer and environmental risk factors. ionizing radiation and breast cancer risk: fact sheet #52. Retrieved from (2005). http://envirocancer.cornell.edu/factsheet/physical/fs52.radiation.cfm November 15, 2007
8. Brem R.F., Floerke A.C., Rapelyea J.A., Teal C., Kelly T., and Mathur V. Breast-specific gamma imaging as an adjunct imaging modality for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiology 247 3 (2008) 651-657
9. Brown M.L., Houn F., Sickles E.A., and Kessler L.G. Screening mammography in community practice: positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic procedures. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology 165 6 (1995) 1373-1377
10. Chen B., and Ning R. Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: feasibility study. Medica Physica 29 5 (2002) 755-770
11. Chen Z., and Ning R. Why should breast tumour detection go three dimensional?. Physics in Medicine and Biology 48 14 (2003) 2217-2228
12. Elmore J.G., Miglioretti D.L., Reisch L.M., Barton M.B., Kreuter W., Christiansen C.L., et al. Screening mammograms by community radiologists: variability in false-positive rates. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 94 18 (2002) 1373-1380
13. Fischer U., von Heyden D., Vosshenrich R., Vieweg I., and Grabbe E. Signal characteristics of malignant and benign lesions in dynamic 2D-MRT of the breast. Rofo 158 4 (1993) 287-292
14. Fobben E.S., Rubin C.Z., Kalisher L., Dembner A.G., Seltzer M.H., and Santoro E.J. Breast MR imaging with commercially available techniques: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 196 1 (1995) 143-152
15. Gilles R., Guinebretiere J.M., Lucidarme O., Cluzel P., Janaud G., Finet J.F., et al. Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 191 3 (1994) 625-631
16. Glick S.J., Thacker S., Gong X., and Liu B. Evaluating the impact of X-ray spectral shape on image quality in flat-panel CT breast imaging. Medica Physica 34 1 (2007) 5-24
17. Gulsun M., Demirkazik F.B., and Ariyurek M. Evaluation of breast microcalcifications according to breast imaging reporting and data system criteria and Le Gal's classification. European Journal of Radiology 47 3 (2003) 227-231
18. Harms S.E., Flamig D.P., Hesley K.L., Meiches M.D., Jensen R.A., Evans W.P., et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 187 2 (1993) 493-501
19. Hendrick R.E., Bassett L., Botsco M.A., Deibel D., Feig S., Gray J., Haus A., Heinlein R., Kitts E.L., McCrohan J., and Monsees B. Mammography Quality Control Manual. American College of Radialogy 284 (1999)
20. Hendrick R.E., Smith R.A., Rutledge III J.H., and Smart C.R. Benefit of screening mammography in women aged 40-49: a new meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs 22 (1997) 87-92
21. Hulka C.A., Smith B.L., Sgroi D.C., Tan L., Edmister W.B., Semple J.P., et al. Benign and malignant breast lesions: differentiation with echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 197 1 (1995) 33-38
22. Jackson V.P., Hendrick R.E., Feig S.A., and Kopans D.B. Imaging of the radiographically dense breast. Radiology 188 2 (1993) 297-301
23. Jemal A., Siegel R., Ward E., Murray T., Xu J., and Thun M.J. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 57 1 (2007) 43-66
24. Karssemeijer N., Frieling J.T., and Hendriks J.H. Spatial resolution in digital mammography. Investigative Radiology 28 5 (1993) 413-419
25. Kerlikowske K., Grady D., Barclay J., Sickles E.A., Eaton A., and Ernster V. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association 270 20 (1993) 2444-2450
26. Kopans D.B., Moore R.H., McCarthy K.A., Hall D.A., Hulka C.A., Whitman G.J., et al. Positive predictive value of breast biopsy performed as a result of mammography: there is no abrupt change at age 50 years. Radiology 200 2 (1996) 357-360
27. Kuhl C.K., Schrading S., Leutner C.C., Morakkabati-Spitz N., Wardelmann E., Fimmers R., et al. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 23 33 (2005) 8469-8476
28. Lazzari B., Belli G., Gori C., and Rosselli Del Turco M. Physical characteristics of five clinical systems for digital mammography. Medical Physics 34 7 (2007) 2730-2743
29. Lindfors K.K., Boone J.M., Nelson T.R., Yang K., Kwan A.L., and Miller D.F. Dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience. Radiology 246 3 (2008) 725-733
30. Mahesh M. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: digital mammography: an overview. Radiographics 24 6 (2004) 1747-1760
31. Mandelson M.T., Oestreicher N., Porter P.L., White D., Finder C.A., Taplin S.H., et al. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 92 13 (2000) 1081-1087
32. McKinley R.L., Tornai M.P., Brzymialkiewicz C., Madhav P., Samei E., and Bowsher J.E. Analysis of a novel offset cone-beam computed mammotomography system geometry for accommodating various breast sizes. Physica Medica 21 Suppl. 1 (2006) 48-55
33. Meyer J.E., Eberlein T.J., Stomper P.C., and Sonnenfeld M.R. Biopsy of occult breast lesions. Analysis of 1261 abnormalities. Journal of the American Medical Association 263 17 (1990) 2341-2343
34. Ning R., Chen B., Conover D., McHugh L., Cullinan J., and Yu R. Flat panel detector-based cone beam volume CT mammography imaging: preliminary phantom study. Medical Imaging 2001: Physics of Medical Imaging 2001. Proceedings of SPIE 4320 (2001) 601-610
35. Ning R., Conover D., Chen B., McHugh L., Cullinan J., and Yu R. Flat panel detector-based cone beam volume CT beast imaging: phantom and specimen study. Medical Imaging 2002: Physics of Medical Imaging 2002. Proceedings of SPIE 4682 (2002) 218-227
36. Ning, R., Conover, D., Lu, X., Zhang, Y., Yu, Y., Schiffhauer, L., Cullinan, J. (2005). Evaluation of flat panel detector cone beam CT breast imaging with different sizes of breast phantoms. Medical Imaging 2005: Physics of Medical Imaging 2005. Proceedings of SPIE, 5745 (SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 2005), 626-636.
37. Ning R., Conover D., Yu Y., Schiffhauer L., Cullinan J., and Robinson A. Real time flat panel detector-based cone beam CT breast imaging: phantom and specimen study. Medical Imaging 2003: Physics of Medical Imaging 2003. Proceedings of SPIE 5030 (2003) 185-190
38. Ning R., Conoverm D., Yum Y., Zhangm Y., Caim W., Lum X., et al. A novel cone beam CT scanner: preliminary system evaluation. Medical Imaging 2006: Physics of Medical Imaging 2006. Proceedings of SPIE, Belingham, WA: SPIE 6142 (2006) 111-119
39. Ning R., Tang X., Conover D., and Yu R. Flat panel detector-based cone beam computed tomography with a circle-plus-two-arcs data acquisition orbit: preliminary phantom study. Medica Physica 30 7 (2003) 1694-1705
40. Ning R., Yu Y., Conover D., Lu X., He H., Chen Z., et al. Preliminary system characterization of flat panel detector-based cone beam CT for breast imaging. Medical Imaging 2004: Physics of Medical Imaging 2004. Proceedings of SPIE 5368 (2004) 292-303
41. Nystrom L., Andersson I., Bjurstam N., Frisell J., Nordenskjold B., and Rutqvist L.E. Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 359 9310 (2002) 909-919
42. Persliden J., Fransson V., Vitak B., and Fagerberg G. Comparison of image quality and mean absorbed dose to the breast for two mammographic films. Acta Radiologic 34 4 (1993) 351-355
43. Radford D.M., Cromack D.T., Troop B.R., Keller S.M., and Lopez M.J. Pathology and treatment of impalpable breast lesions. American Journal of Surgery 164 5 (1992) 427-431 discussion 431-432
44. Radiological Society of North America. Safety: radiation exposure in x-ray examinations. Retrieved from (2007). http://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/safety/index.cfm?pg=sfty_xray&bhcp=1 November 15, 2007
45. Saslow D., Boetes C., Burke W., Harms S., Leach M.O., Lehman C.D., et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 57 2 (2007) 75-89
46. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Mammography Quality Standards Act regulations: 900.12 quality standards: Section (e), part (5) Dosimetry in Mammography Quality Standards Act regulations (2002). http://www.fda.gov/CDRH/MAMMOGRAPHY/frmamcom2.html Retrieved from November 15, 2007
47. Yang W.T., Carkaci S., Chen L., Lai C.J., Sahin A., Whitman G.J., et al. Dedicated cone-beam breast CT: feasibility study with surgical mastectomy specimens. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology 189 6 (2007) 1312-1315