Mathematics Teaching Assistant Preparation And Development

College Teaching

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 75-80

  Speer, Natasha ^a   Gutmann, Timothy ^a   Murphy, Teri J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

mathematics; professional development; teaching assistants

Indexed keywords

EID: 60849111620     PISSN: 87567555     EISSN: 19308299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/CTCH.53.2.75-80     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Dees, R. L. 1991. The role of cooperative learning in increasing problem-solving ability in a college remedial course. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 22 (5): 409-21.
2. Brown, C. A. 1985. A study of the socialization to teaching of a beginning secondary mathematics teacher. PhD diss., University of Georgia.
3. Lacey, C. 1977. The socialization of teachers. London: Methuen.
4. Lortie, D. C. 1975. Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Meel, D. 2000. Case study of adjustment: A graduate teaching assistant's struggles. Paper presented at the 22nd annual conference of Psychology of Mathematics Education-North America, Tucson, Arizona.
6. Case, B. A., ed. 1989. Response to the challenge: Keys to improved instruction by teaching assistants and part-time instructors. Vol. 11. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
7. DeFranco, T. C., and J. McGivney-Burelle. 2001. The beliefs and instructional practices of mathematics teaching assistants participating in a mathematics pedagogy course. Paper presented at the 23rd annual conference of Psychology of Mathematics Education-North America, Snowbird, Utah.
8. DeLong, M., and D. Winter. 2002. Learning to teach and teaching to learn mathematics: Resources for professional development. Vol. 57. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
9. Douglas, R. G., ed. 1986. Toward a lean and lively calculus. Vol. 6. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
10. Eisenhart, M. 1995. The fax, the jazz player, and the self-story teller: How do people organize culture? Anthropology & Education Quarterly 26 (1): 3-26.
11. Chronicle of Higher Education Enzensberger, H. M. 1999. Why no one knows we're living in a golden age of mathematics., April 30.
12. Ferrini-Mundy, J., and T. Schram, eds. 1997. The recognizing and recording reform in mathematics education project: Insights, issues, and implications. Vol. 8. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
13. Friedberg, S., A. Ash, E. Brown, D. Hughes Hallett, R. Kasman, M. Kenney, L. A. Mantini, W. McCallum, J. Teitelbaum, and L. Zia. 2001a. Teaching mathematics in colleges and universities: Case studies for today's classroom: Faculty edition. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
14. Murphy, T. J., and K. Wahl. 2003. Adapting a workshop calculus model to college algebra: Instructional challenges. American Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges Review 24 (2): 33-44.
15. National Science Foundation. 1986. Undergraduate science, mathematics and engineering education: Role for the National Science Foundation and recommendations for action by other sectors to strengthen collegiate education and pursue excellence in the next generation of U.S. leadership in science and technology. Washington, DC: National Science Board, NSB Task Committee on Undergraduate Science and Engineering Education.
16. National Science Foundation. 1992. America's academic future: A report of the Presidential Young Investigator Colloquium on U.S. Engineering, Mathematics, and Science Education for the Year 2010 and Beyond. Washington, DC: Directorate for Education and Human Resources, National Science Foundation.
17. Rishel, T. 2000. Teaching first: A guide for new mathematicians. Vol. 54. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
18. Schoenfeld, A. H. 1994. Some notes on the enterprise (research in collegiate mathematics education, that is). In Research in collegiate mathematics education I, ed. E. Dubinsky, A. H. Schoenfeld, and J. Kaput, vol. 4, 1-20. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
19. Selden, A., and J. Selden. 1993. Collegiate mathematics education research: What would that be like? College Mathematics Journal 24 (5): 431-45.
20. Seymour, E., and N. Hewitt. 1997. Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
21. Speer, N. M. 2001. Connecting beliefs and teaching practices: A study of teaching assistants in collegiate reform calculus courses. PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley.
22. Star, J., and J. Smith. In press. An image of calculus reform: Students' experiences of Harvard calculus. Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education.
23. Van Dooren, W., L. Verschaffel, and P. Onghena. 2002. The impact of preservice teachers' content knowledge on their evaluation of students' strategies for solving arithmetic and algebra word problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 33 (5): 319-51.
24. Williams, S. R. 1991. Models of limit held by college calculus students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 22 (3): 219-36.
25. Zeichner, K. M., and B. R. Tabachnick. 1985. The development of teacher perspectives: Social strategies and institutional control in the socialization of beginning teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching 11 (1): 1-25.
26. Friedberg, S., A. Ash, E. Brown, D. Hughes Hallett, R. Kasman, M. Kenney, L. A. Mantini, W. McCallum, J. Teitelbaum, and L. Zia. 2001b. Teaching mathematics in colleges and universities: Case studies for today's classroom: Graduate student edition. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
27. Gutmann, T. 2000. Mathematics and sociocultural behavior: A case study of the enculturation of a new mathematician. PhD diss., University of New Hampshire.
28. Heitsch, C., and N. M. Speer. 2000. Math 300 instructor's guide. Berkeley, CA: Department of Mathematics, U.C. Berkeley.
29. Herzig, A. H. 2001. The role of the intellectual culture of mathematics in doctoral student attrition. Paper presented at the 23rd annual conference of Psychology of Mathematics Education-North America, Snowbird, Utah.
30. FOCUS: The Newsletter of the Mathematical Association of America Murphy, T. J., W. Branson, S. Friedberg, L. C. Kappe, J. Madden, D. Manderscheid, L. Mantini, E. Marchisotto, P. McCreary, A. Nestler, J. Novak, S. Plisch, N. Speer, J. Wilson, and L. Zia. 2000. Innovative programs address professional development of teaching assistants and adjuncts. 20, no. 5 (May/June): 9.
31. Case, B. A., ed. 1994. You're the professor, what next? Ideas and resources for preparing college teachers. Vol. 35. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
32. Damarin, S. K. 2000. The mathematically able as a marked category. Gender & Education 12(1): 69-85.