Expanding the range of dependent measures in mainstreaming and cultivation analysis

Communication Research Reports

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 408-417

  Jeffres, Leo W ^a   Atkin, David J ^a   Neuendorf, Kimberly A ^a  

^a CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 60849111237     PISSN: 08824096     EISSN: 17464099     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08824090109384822     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Atkin, D., Jeffres, L., and Neuendorf, K., 1997. Cultivation and public support for government restrictions on constitutional freedoms. Mass Communication Review, 24: 106–124.
2. 2000. Cleveland News Index, Cleveland Public Library.
3. Demers, D., and Viswanath, K., 1999. Mass media, social control and social change, Ames: Iowa State Press.
4. Gerbner, G., and Gross, G., 1976. Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26: 173–199.
5. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Jackson-Beeck, M., Jeffries-Fox, S., and Signorielli, N., 1978. Cultural indicators: Violence profile no. 9. Journal of Communication, 28: 176–207.
6. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., and Signorielli, N., 1986. “ Living with television: The dynamics of the cultivation process ”. In Perspectives on media effects, Edited by: Bryant, J., and Zillmann, D., 17–40. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
7. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Signorielli, N., and Morgan, M., 1980. The ‘mainstreaming’ of America: Violence profile no. 11. Journal of Communication, 30: 10–29.
8. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Signorielli, N., and Morgan, M., 1980. Aging with television: Images on television drama and conceptions of social reality. Journal of Communication, 30: 37–47.
9. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Signorielli, N., Morgan, M., and Jackson-Beeck, M., 1979. The demonstration of power: Violence profile no. 10. Journal of Communication, 29: 177–196.
10. Greenberg, B. S., 1988. “ Some uncommon television images and the drench hypothesis ”. In Television as a social issue, Edited by: Oskamp, S., 88–102. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
11. Hawkins, R. P., Pingree, S., and Adler, I., 1987. Searching for cognitive processes in the cultivation effect: Adult and adolescent samples in the United States and Australia. Human Communication Research, 13: 553–577.
12. McAvoy, K., 1994. 1st lady decries excess violence in TV news. Broadcasting & Cable, March 14: 47
13. Matabane, P. W., 1988. Television and the black audience: Cultivating moderate perspectives on racial integration. Journal of Communication, 38: 21–31.
14. Morgan, M., 1984. Heavy television viewing and perceived quality of life. Journalism Quarterly, 61: 499–504. 740
15. Morgan, M., and Rothschild, N., 1983. Impact of the new television technology: Cable TV, peers, and sex-role cultivation in the electronic environment. Youth & Society, 15: 33–50.
16. O'Keefe, G. J., and Reid-Nash, K., 1987. Crime news and real-world blues: The effects of the media on social reality. Communication Research, 14: 147–163.
17. Potter, W. J., 1991a. Examining cultivation from a psychological perspective component subprocesses. Communication Research, 18: 77–102.
18. Potter, W. J., 1991b. The linearity assumption in cultivation research. Human Communication Research, 17: 562–583.
19. Shanahan, J., and Morgan, M., 1999. Television and its viewers, London: Cambridge University Press.
20. Wober, J. M., 1990. “ Does television cultivate the British?”. In Cultivation analysis: New directions in media effects research, Edited by: Signorielli, N., and Morgan, M., 207–223. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 1990