Instructional videos for supporting older adults who use interactive systems

Educational Gerontology

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 164-176

  Gramss, Denise ^a,b   Struve, Doreen ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 60849111129     PISSN: 03601277     EISSN: 15210472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03601270802421434     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Artis, S. (2005). The effects of age, computer self-efficacy, and the design of Web based training on computer task performance. Unpublished Master thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg. Retrieved January 10, 2007, from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd- 04182005-140002/unrestricted/Sharnnia-Artis-MS-Thesis.pdf
2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action-A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
4. Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 21-41.
5. Bruder, C. (2008). Design principles for the interaction between older adults and multi-function devices. Dissertation. Available at http://opus.kobv.de/tuberlin/frontdoor.php?source-opus=1889&la=de
6. Eachus, P., & Cassidy, S. (2002). Developing the computer self-efficacy (CSE) scale: Investigating the relationship between CSE, gender and experience with computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(2), 135-153.
7. Igbaria, M., & Chakrabarti, A. (1990). Computer anxiety and attitudes towards microcomputer use. Behaviour and Technology, 9(3), 229-241.
8. Jay, G. M., & Willis, S. L. (1992). Influence of direct computer experience on older adults' attitudes towards computers. Journal of Gerontology, 47(4), 250-257.
9. Jerusalem, M., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). SWE. Skala zur Allgemeinen Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung [SWE. General self-efficacy scale]. In E. Brähler, J. Schumacher, & B. Strauß (Eds.), Diagnostische Verfahren in der Psychotherapie. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
10. Lewis, C., Poison, P. G., Wharton, C., & Rieman, J. (1990, April). Testing a walkthrough methodology for theory-based design of walk-up-and-use interfaces. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Empowering People (pp. 235-242). Seattle, WA: ACM.
11. Lin, D.-Y. M., & Hsieh, C.-T, J. (2006). The role of multimedia in training the elderly to acquire operational skills of a digital camera, Gerontechnology, 5(2), 68-77.
12. Marcellini, F., Mollenkopf, H., Spazzafumo, L., & Ruoppila, I. (2000). Acceptance and use of technological solutions by the elderly in the outdoor environment: Findings from European survey. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 1(33), 169-177.
13. Marquié, J. C., Jourdan-Boddaert, L., & Huet, N. (2002). Do older adults underestimate their actual computer knowledge? Behaviour and Information Technology, 21, 273-280.
14. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Mayer, R. E. (2005). Principles of multimedia learning based on social cues: personalization, voice and image principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 201-212). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. McLaughlin, A. C., Rogers, W. A., & Fisk, A. D. (October 2002). Effectiveness of audio and visual training presentation modes for glucometer calibration. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th annual meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
17. Mollenkopf, H., & Doh, M. (2004). Internet und neue Technologien-das Medienverhalten älterer Menschen. 4. Fachtagung "Senioren in der Informationsgesellschaft" des Bayrischen Senioren Netz Forums [Internet and new technologies-Medical behavior of older adults. 4th symposium "Seniors in Information Society" of Bavarian Seniors net forum]. 26.03.2004, 31-46.
18. Mykityshyn, A., Fisk, A. D., & Rogers, W. A. (2002). Learning to use a home medical device: Mediating age-related differences with training. Human Factors, 44, 354-364.
19. Paas, F., van Geveren, P. W. M., & Tabbers, H. K. (2005). The cognitive aging principle in multimedia learning. In: R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning(pp. 339-351). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Porteous, M., Kirakowski, J., & Corbett, M. (1993). SUMI user handbook. Ireland: Human Factors Research Group, University College Cork.
21. Schnk, D. H., & Hanson, A. R. (1985). Peer models: Influence on children's selfefficacy and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 313-322.
22. Sierra, E. A. Jr., Fisk, A. D., & Rogers, W. A. (2002). Matching instructional media with instructional demands. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th annual meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
23. Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
24. Torkzadeh, G., Chang, J. C., & Demirhan, D. (2006). A contingency model of computer and internet self-efficacy. Information & Management, 43, 541-550.
25. Zimmer, Z., & Chappell, N. L. (1999). Receptivity to new technology among older adults. Disability and Rehabilitation, 21, 222-230.