Dynamic evolution of bitter taste receptor genes in vertebrates

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2009, Pages

  Dong, Dong ^a   Jones, Gareth ^b   Zhang, Shuyi ^a  

^a EAST CHINA NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

G PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTOR; TASTE RECEPTORS, TYPE 2;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; GENETICS; GENOME; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; PSEUDOGENE; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; VERTEBRATE;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOME; PHYLOGENY; PSEUDOGENES; RECEPTORS, G-PROTEIN-COUPLED; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; VERTEBRATES;

EID: 60849111122     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-12     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. T2Rs function as bitter taste receptors. J Chandrashekar KL Mueller MA Hoon E Adler L Feng W Guo CS Zuker NJ Ryba, Cell 2000 100 6 703 711 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80706-0 10761935
2. Is the bitter rejection response always adaptive? JI Glendinning, Physiol Behav 1994 56 6 1217 1227 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90369-7 7878094
3. Contribution of different bitter-sensitive taste cells to feeding inhibition in a caterpillar (Manduca sexta). JI Glendinning M Tarre K Asaoka, Behav Neurosci 1999 113 4 840 854 10.1037/0735-7044.113.4.840 10495092
4. Amino acid receptor channels in taste cells. JH Teeter T Kumazawa JG Brand DL Kalinoski E Honda G Smutzer, Soc Gen Physiol Ser 1992 47 291 306 1285440
5. An amino-acid taste receptor. G Nelson J Chandrashekar MA Hoon L Feng G Zhao NJ Ryba CS Zuker, Nature 2002 416 6877 199 202 10.1038/nature726 11894099
6. Coding of sweet, bitter, and umami tastes: different receptor cells sharing similar signaling pathways. Y Zhang MA Hoon J Chandrashekar KL Mueller B Cook D Wu CS Zuker NJ Ryba, Cell 2003 112 3 293 301 10.1016/S0092-8674(03) 00071-0 12581520
7. Transduction of bitter and sweet taste by gustducin. GT Wong KS Gannon RF Margolskee, Nature 1996 381 6585 796 800 10.1038/381796a0 8657284
8. Sweet tastants stimulate adenylate cyclase coupled to GTP-binding protein in rat tongue membranes. BJ Striem U Pace U Zehavi M Naim D Lancet, Biochem J 1989 260 1 121 126 2505747
9. Identification and characterization of human taste receptor genes belonging to the TAS2R family. C Conte M Ebeling A Marcuz P Nef PJ Andres-Barquin, Cytogenet Genome Res 2002 98 1 45 53 10.1159/000068546 12584440
10. Adaptive diversification of bitter taste receptor genes in Mammalian evolution. P Shi J Zhang H Yang YP Zhang, Mol Biol Evol 2003 20 5 805 814 10.1093/molbev/msg083 12679530
11. A novel family of mammalian taste receptors. E Adler MA Hoon KL Mueller J Chandrashekar NJ Ryba CS Zuker, Cell 2000 100 6 693 702 10.1016/S0092-8674(00) 80705-9 10761934
12. Divergence of T2R chemosensory receptor families in humans, bonobos, and chimpanzees. CM Parry A Erkner J le Coutre, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004 101 41 14830 14834 15466715 10.1073/pnas.0404894101
13. Lineage-specific loss of function of bitter taste receptor genes in humans and nonhuman primates. Y Go Y Satta O Takenaka N Takahata, Genetics 2005 170 1 313 326 15744053 10.1534/genetics.104.037523
14. Relaxation of selective constraint and loss of function in the evolution of human bitter taste receptor genes. X Wang SD Thomas J Zhang, Hum Mol Genet 2004 13 21 2671 2678 10.1093/hmg/ddh289 15367488
15. Proceedings of the SMBE Tri-National Young Investigators' Workshop 2005. Lineage-specific expansions and contractions of the bitter taste receptor gene repertoire in vertebrates. Y Go, Mol Biol Evol 2006 23 5 964 972 10.1093/molbev/msj106 16484289
16. Contrasting modes of evolution between vertebrate sweet/umami receptor genes and bitter receptor genes. P Shi J Zhang, Mol Biol Evol 2006 23 2 292 300 10.1093/molbev/msj028 16207936
17. A family of candidate taste receptors in human and mouse. H Matsunami JP Montmayeur LB Buck, Nature 2000 404 6778 601 604 10.1038/35007072 10766242
18. Evolutionary relationships of the Tas2r receptor gene families in mouse and human. C Conte M Ebeling A Marcuz P Nef PJ Andres-Barquin, Physiol Genomics 2003 14 1 73 82 12734386
19. The repertoire of G-protein-coupled receptors in fully sequenced genomes. R Fredriksson HB Schioth, Mol Pharmacol 2005 67 5 1414 1425 10.1124/mol.104.009001 15687224
20. The G protein-coupled receptor subset of the rat genome. DE Gloriam R Fredriksson HB Schioth, BMC Genomics 2007 8 338 17892602 10.1186/1471-2164-8-338
21. The G protein-coupled receptor subset of the chicken genome. MC Lagerstrom AR Hellstrom DE Gloriam TP Larsson HB Schioth R Fredriksson, PLoS Comput Biol 2006 2 6 e54 16741557 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020054
22. Evolutionary change of the numbers of homeobox genes in bilateral animals. J Nam M Nei, Mol Biol Evol 2005 22 12 2386 2394 16079247 10.1093/molbev/msi229
23. Extensive gains and losses of olfactory receptor genes in Mammalian evolution. Y Niimura M Nei, PLoS ONE 2007 2 1 e708 17684554 10.1371/journal. pone.0000708
24. From gene to organismal phylogeny: reconciled trees and the gene tree/species tree problem. RD Page MA Charleston, Mol Phylogenet Evol 1997 7 2 231 240 10.1006/mpev.1996.0390 9126565
25. Evolution of bitter taste receptors in humans and apes. A Fischer Y Gilad O Man S Paabo, Mol Biol Evol 2005 22 3 432 436 10.1093/molbev/msi027 15496549
26. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. N Saitou M Nei, Mol Biol Evol 1987 4 4 406 425 3447015
27. Dramatic variation of the vomeronasal pheromone receptor gene repertoire among five orders of placental and marsupial mammals. WE Grus P Shi YP Zhang J Zhang, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005 102 16 5767 5772 15790682 10.1073/pnas.0501589102
28. Mammalian phylogenomics comes of age. WJ Murphy PA Pevzner SJ O'Brien, Trends Genet 2004 20 12 631 639 10.1016/j.tig.2004.09.005 15522459
29. Estimation of divergence times for major lineages of primate species. GV Glazko M Nei, Mol Biol Evol 2003 20 3 424 434 10.1093/molbev/msg050 12644563
30. Pegasoferae, an unexpected mammalian clade revealed by tracking ancient retroposon insertions. H Nishihara M Hasegawa N Okada, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006 103 26 9929 9934 16785431 10.1073/pnas.0603797103
31. A phylogenetic foundation for comparative mammalian genomics. PJ Waddell H Kishino R Ota, Genome Inform 2001 12 141 154 11791233
32. The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods. MJ Benton, 1988
33. The human TAS2R16 receptor mediates bitter taste in response to beta-glucopyranosides. B Bufe T Hofmann D Krautwurst JD Raguse W Meyerhof, Nat Genet 2002 32 3 397 401 10.1038/ng1014 12379855
34. Ultrastructure, number, distribution and innervation of electroreceptors and mechanoreceptors in the bill skin of the platypus, Ornithorhynchus anatinus. PR Manger JD Pettigrew, Brain Behav Evol 1996 48 1 27 54 10.1159/000113185 8828862
35. Initial sequence and comparative analysis of the cat genome. JU Pontius JC Mullikin DR Smith K Lindblad-Toh S Gnerre M Clamp J Chang R Stephens B Neelam N Volfovsky AA Schäffer K Narfström WJ Murphy U Giger AL Rocal A Antunes MM Raymond N Yuhki JP Slattery WE Johnson G Bourquel Tesler, Genome Res 2007 17 11 1675 1689 17975172 10.1101/gr.6380007
36. The complete mitochondrial genome of Alligator mississippiensis and the separation between recent archosauria (birds and crocodiles). A Janke U Arnason, Mol Biol Evol 1997 14 12 1266 1272 9402737
37. Evolutionary and biomedical insights from the rhesus macaque genome. RA Gibbs J Rogers MG Katze R Bumgarner GM Weinstock ER Mardis KA Remington RL Strausberg JC Venter RK Wilson, Science 2007 316 5822 222 234 10.1126/science.1139247 17431167
38. Genome sequence of the Brown Norway rat yields insights into mammalian evolution. RA Gibbs GM Weinstock ML Metzker DM Muzny EJ Sodergren S Scherer G Scott D Steffen KC Worley PE Burch, Nature 2004 428 6982 493 521 10.1038/nature02426 15057822
39. Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. K Lindblad-Toh CM Wade TS Mikkelsen EK Karlsson DB Jaffe M Kamal M Clamp JL Chang EJ Kulbokas 3rd MC Zody, Nature 2005 438 7069 803 819 10.1038/nature04338 16341006
40. Genome analysis of the platypus reveals unique signatures of evolution. WC Warren LW Hillier JA Marshall Graves E Birney CP Ponting F Grutzner K Belov W Miller L Clarke AT Chinwalla, Nature 2008 453 7192 175 183 10.1038/nature06936 18464734
41. Basic local alignment search tool. SF Altschul W Gish W Miller EW Myers DJ Lipman, J Mol Biol 1990 215 3 403 410 2231712
42. MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. K Katoh K Kuma H Toh T Miyata, Nucleic Acids Res 2005 33 2 511 518 15661851 10.1093/nar/gki198
43. MEGA3: Integrated software for Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis and sequence alignment. S Kumar K Tamura M Nei, Brief Bioinform 2004 5 2 150 163 10.1093/bib/5.2.150 15260895
44. Vertebrate phylogenomics: reconciled trees and gene duplications. RD Page JA Cotton, Pac Symp Biocomput 2002 536 547 11928506
45. The origin and evolution of model organisms. SB Hedges, Nat Rev Genet 2002 3 11 838 849 10.1038/nrg929 12415314
46. Female stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus use self-reference to optimize MHC allele number during mate selection. PB Aeschlimann MA Haberli TBH Reusch T Boehm M Milinski, Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2003 54 119 126