Constructs of writing proficiency in US state and national writing assessments: Exploring variability

Assessing Writing

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 3-24

  Jeffery, Jill V ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Composition theory; Genre analysis; High school; High stakes; Writing assessment; Writing proficiency

Indexed keywords

EID: 60849108310     PISSN: 10752935     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2008.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. ACT. (2005). Crisis at the core: Preparing all students for college and work (Report No. IC 050805270-7416). Iowa City, IA: ACT, Inc. Retrieved 8/15, 2007, from http://www.act.org/research/policymakers/pdf/crisis_report.pdf
2. ACT writing test description. Retrieved 10/22, 2007, from http://www.actstudent.org/testprep/descriptions/writingdescript.html
3. Albertson B.R. Organization and development features of grade 8 and grade 10 writers: A descriptive study of Delaware student testing program (DSTP) essays. Research in the Teaching of English 41 4 (2007) 435-464
4. A bad report card. (2007, February 27). New York Times, p. A18.
5. Appleman D., and Greene D. Mapping the elusive boundary between high school and college writing. Journal of College Composition and Communication 44 2 (1993) 191-199
6. Beck S., and Jeffery J. Genres of high-stakes writing assessments and the construct of writing competence. Assessing Writing 12 1 (2007) 60-79
7. Berkenkotter C., and Huckin T.N. Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication (1995), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey
8. Black P., and Wiliam D. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education 5 (1998) 7-73
9. Center on Education Policy. State high school exit exams: A move toward end-of-course exams (2008), Author, Washington, DC
10. Cech, S. J. (2008, October 1). Testing expert sees "illusions of progress" under NCLB. Education Week, 28(6).
11. Cope B., and Kalantzis M. The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing (1993), Falmer Press, London
12. Corbin S., and Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research. 3rd ed. (2008), Sage, Los Angeles
13. Cronin, J., Dahlin, M., Adkins, D., & Kingsbury, G. (2007, October). The proficiency illusion. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute and Northwest Evaluation Association. Retrieved 12/3, 2007, from http://www.edexcellence.net/doc/The_Proficiency_Illusion.pdf
14. Dann R. Assessment as learning (2001), Falmer, Routledge
15. Dappen L., Isernhagen J., and Anderson S. A statewide writing assessment model: Student proficiency and future implications. Assessing writing 13 (2008) 45-60
16. Dean, D. M. (1999). Current-traditional rhetoric: Its past, and what content analysis of texts and tests shows about its present (Doctoral dissertation, Seattle Pacific University).
17. Escamilla K., Mahon E., Riley-Bernal H., and Rutledge D. High-stakes testing, Latinos, and English language learners: Lessons from Colorado. Bilingual Research Journal 27 1 (2003) 25
18. Finn C.E., and Petrilli M.J. Forward: The proficiency illusion (2007, October), Thomas B. Fordham Institute and Northwest Evaluation Association, Washington, DC
19. Flower L. Negotiating academic discourse. In: Flower L., Stein V., Ackerman J., Kantz M.J., McCormick K., and Peck W.C. (Eds). Reading-to-write: Exploring a cognitive and social process (1990), Oxford University Press, New York, NY, US 221-261
20. Furham S.H., and O'Day J. Rewards and reform: Creating education incentives that work (1996), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
21. Gambell T.J., and Hunter D.M. The evolution of literacy through large-scale assessment. McGill Journal of Education 34 1 (1999) 7-27
22. In: Gorman T.P., Purves A.C., and Degenhart E. (Eds). The IEA study of written composition. I: The International Tasks and Scoring Scales (1988), Pergamon Press, Oxford
23. Hamp-Lyons L. Writing assessment in the world [Editorial]. Assessing writing 9 (2004) 1-3
24. Hillocks G. The testing trap: How state writing assessments control learning (2002), Teachers College Press, New York
25. How well are they really doing? (2008, August 12). New York Times, p. A20.
26. Hulbert, A. (2007, May 27). Standardizing the standards. New York Times, p. 11.
27. Huot B. The literature of direct writing assessment: Major concerns and prevailing trends. Review of Educational Research 60 2 (1990) 237
28. Huot B. Toward a new theory of writing assessment. College Composition and Communication 47 (1996) 549-566
29. Ivaniç R. Discourses of writing and learning to write. Language and education 18 3 (2004) 220-245
30. Jeffery, J. (2007, November). Discourses of writing in high-stakes direct writing assessments. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Reading Conference, Austin, TX.
31. Jonassen D.H., Hannum W.H., and Tessmer M. Task analysis methods for instructional design (1999), Erlbaum, Mahwah, N.J.
32. Kirst M.W., and Bracco K.R. Bridging the great divide: How the k-12 and postsecondary split hurts students, and what can be done about it. In: Kirst M.W., and Venezia A. (Eds). From high school to college: Improving opportunities for success in postsecondary education (2004), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 1-30
33. Lee, J., Grigg, W. S., & Donahue, P. L. (2007). The nation's report card: Reading 2007 (No. NCES 2007496). Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
34. Luce-Kapler R., and Klinger D. Uneasy writing: The defining moments of high-stakes literacy testing. Assessing Writing 8 3 (2003) 157-173
35. Manzo K.K. NAEP results underscore need to up writing instruction. Education Week 22 43 (2003, August 6)
36. Mayher J.S., Lester N., and Pradl G.M. Learning to write, writing to learn (1983), Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH
37. McNeil, M. (2008, March 12). Benchmarks momentum on increase: Governors' group, state chiefs eyeing international yardsticks. Education Week, 27(27). Retrieved 3/12, 2008, from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2008/03/12/27nga_ep.h27.html
38. Messenheimer T., and Packwood A. Writing: The state of the state vs. the state of the art in English and American schools. Reading: Literacy & Language 36 1 (2002) 11-15
39. Miller M. First, kill all the school boards. Atlantic Monthly 301 1; 1 (2008, January/February) 92-97
40. Moss P. Validity in high stakes writing assessment: Problems and possibilities. Assessing Writing 1 1 (1994) 109-128
41. National Association for College Admission Counseling. (2008). Report of the commission on the use of standardized tests in undergraduate admission. Arlington, VA: Author.
42. National Center for Education Statistics. (2007). Mapping 2005 state proficiency standards onto the NAEP scales (NCES 2007-482). US Department of Education. Washington, DC: Author.
43. Nebeker, M. L. (2005). Constructing literacy: An examination of discourse in policy through content analysis (Doctoral dissertation, The American University).
44. Perelman L. Information illiteracy and mass market writing assessments. College Composition and Communication 60 1 (2008) 128-141
45. Rimer, S. (2008, January 17). Urban schools aiming higher than diploma. The New York Times, p. 1.
46. Salahu-Din, D., Persky, H., & Miller, J. (2008). The nation's report card: Writing 2007 (National Assessment of Educational Progress No. NCES 2008468). Washington, D.C.: US Department of Education National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved 10/12, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2008468
47. SAT writing. Retrieved 10/22, 2007, from http://www.collegeboard.com/student/testing/sat/prep_one/writing.html
48. Sealey A. Teaching primary school children about the English language: A critique of current policy documents. Language Awareness 8 2 (1999) 84-97
49. Test and switch. (2007, November 26). New York Times, p. A22.
50. Texas Education Agency. (2004). Exit-level English language arts TAKS information booklet. Retrieved 4/6, 2007, from http://www.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/taks/booklets/write/g11.pdf
51. US Department of Education. (2004). Charting the course: States decide major provisions under No Child Left Behind. Retrieved 8/22, 2008, from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/freedom/local/edpicks.jhtml?src=ln
52. Vogler K.E. The impact of high-stakes state mandated student performance assessment on teachers' instructional practices. Education 123 1 (2002) 39
53. Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. (2003). Writing rubrics and annotated samples grades 4, 8, and 10. Wisconsin statewide writing assessment knowledge and concepts examination: November 2002. Retrieved 5/3, 2007, from www.dpi.state.wi/us/oea/wkce.html