The Hamovitch Research Center: An experiment in collective responsibility for advancing science in the human services

Social Work Research

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 260-268

  Flynn, Marilyn ^a   Brekke, John S ^a   Soydan, Haluk ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Center; Infrastructure; Organization; Research; Social work

Indexed keywords

EID: 60849097250     PISSN: 10705309     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/swr/32.4.260     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Austin, D. M. (1999).A report on progress in the development of research resources in social work. Research on Social Work Practice, 9, 673-707.
2. Brekke, J., Ell, K., & Palinkas, L. (2007). Translational science at the National Institute of Mental Health: Can social work take its rightful place? Research on Social Work Practice, 17, 123-133.
3. Cheetham, J. (1994). The Social Work Research Centre at the University of Stirling: A profile. Research on Social Work Practice, 4, 89-100.
4. England, H. (1986). Social work as art: Making sense for good practice. London: Allen & Unwin.
5. Fischer, J. (1976). The effectiveness of social casework. New York: Charles C Thomas.
6. Fraser, M., Taylor, M.J., & Jackson, R., O'Jack, J. (1991). Social work and science: Many ways of knowing? Social Work Research & Abstracts, 27(4), 5-15.
7. Gambrill, E. (1994). Social work research: Priorities and obstacles. Research on Social Work Practice, 4, 359-388.
8. Goldstein, H. (1990).The knowledge base of social work practice:Analogue or art? Families in Society, 71, 32-43.
9. Hepworth, D., & Larsen, J. (1992). Direct social work practice Theory, wisdom, analogue or art? Families in Society, 74, 32-43.
10. Lewis, C. M., Henney, S. M., McRoy, R. G., & White, B. W. (2002). The Center for Social Work Research at the University of Texas at Austin:A profile. Research on Social Work Practice, 12, 440-451.
11. Lindsey, D., & Kirk, S.A. (1992).The continuing crisis in social work research. Conundrum or solvable problem? An essay review. Journal of Social Work Education, 28, 370-382.
12. Papel, C. P., & Skolnik, L. (1992). The reflective practitioner: A contemporary paradigm's relevance for social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 28, 18-26.
13. Reamer, E (1993). The philosophical foundations of social work. NewYork: Columbia University Press.
14. Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. NewYork: Basic Books.
15. Siporin, M. (1988). Clinical social work as art forum. Social Casework, 69, 177-183.
16. Soydan, H. (1999). The history of ideas in social work. Birmingham, England:Venture Press and The Social Work Research Association.
17. Task Force on Social Work Research. (1991). Building social work knowledge for effective services and policies : A plan for research and development. Austin, TX:Author.
18. Wakefield, J. C. (1996a). Does social work need the ecosystems perspective? Is the perspective clinically useful? Social Service Review, 70, 1-32.
19. Wakefield, J. C. (1996b). Does social work need the ecosystems perspective? Does the perspective save social work from incoherence? Social Service Review, 70, 183-213.
20. Wodarski, J. S. (1995). Guidelines for building research centers in schools of social work. Research on Social Work Practice, 5, 383-398.