Exploring the value of usability feedback formats

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 49-74

  Nørgaard, Mie ^a   Hornbæk, Kasper ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INITIAL FEEDBACK; USABILITY EVALUATION; USABILITY FINDINGS; USABILITY PROBLEMS;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; PSYCHOLOGY COMPUTING;

USABILITY ENGINEERING;

EID: 60849094483     PISSN: 10447318     EISSN: 15327590     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10447310802546708     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Butler, M. B., & Ehrlich, K. (1993). Case study: Lotus Notes 1-2-3 Release 4. Retrieved from http://domino. watson.ibm.com/cambridge/research.nsf/ 0/lb6720e0274ed7b3852563bf 0062325f/$FILE/Wiklund.pdf (last accessed February 2007)
2. Coble, J. M., Karat, J., & Kahn, M. G. (1997). Maintaining a focus on user requirements throughout the development of clinical workstation software. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing, 170-177.
3. Cockton, G. (2006). Focus, fit and fervour: Future factors beyond play with the interplay. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 21(2), 239-250.
4. Cockton, G., & Woolrych, A. (2001). Understanding inspection methods: Lessons from an assessment of heuristic evaluation. In A. Blandford, J. Vanderdonckt, & P. Gray (Eds.), People and computers XV-Interaction without frontiers. Joint Proceedings of HCI2001 and IHM2001 (pp. 171-191). Springer, London, Great Britain.
5. Desurvire, H. W., Lawrence, D., & Atwood, M. E. (1991). Empiricism versus judgement: Comparing user interface evaluation methods on a new telephone-based interface. ACM SICCHI Bulletin, 23(4), 58-59.
6. Dumas, J. (1989). Stimulating change through usability testing. SIGCHI Bulletin, 21, 1.
7. Dumas, J., Molich, R., & Jeffries, R. (2004). Business: Describing usability problems: Are we sending the right message? interactions, 11(4), 24-29.
8. Dumas, J., & Redish, J. (1999). A practical guide to usability testing. Intellect, Exeter, Great Britain.
9. Frøkjær, E., & Hornbæk, K. (2005). Cooperative usability testing: complementing usability tests with user-supported interpretation sessions. Extended Abstracts of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2005), 1383-1386.
10. Hornbæk, K., & Frøkjær, E. (2004). Usability inspection by metaphors of human thinking compared to heuristic evaluation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 27(3), 357-374.
11. Hornbæk, K., & Frøkjær, E. (2005). Comparing usability problems and redesign proposals as input to practical systems development. ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 191-400.
12. Hornbæk, K., & Stage, J. (2006). Special issue on the interplay between usability evaluation and user interaction design. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 21, 5.
13. Jeffries, R. (1993). Usability problem reports: Helping evaluators communicate effectively with developers. In J. Nielsen & R. L. Mack (Eds.), Usability inspection methods (pp. 273-294). John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
14. Jeffries, R., Miller, J. R., Wharton, C., & Uyeda, K. M. (1991). User interface evaluation in the real world: A comparison of four techniques. ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 119-124.
15. John, B. E., & Marks, S. J. (1997). Tracking the effectivity of usability evaluation methods. Behaviour and Information Technology, 26(4/5), 188-202.
16. Kahn, M. G., & Prail, A. (1993). Formal usability inspections. In J. Nielsen & R. L. Mack (Eds.), Usability inspection methods (pp. 141-171). John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
17. Kennedy, S. (1989). Using video in the BNR usability lab. SIGCHI Bulletin, 21(2), 92-95.
18. Law, E. (2006). Evaluating the downstream utility of user tests and examining the developer effect: A case study. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 21(2), 147-172.
19. Mills, C. B. (1987). Usability testing in the real world. SIGCHI Bulletin, 18, 67-70.
20. Nayak, N. P., Mrazek, D., & Smith, D. R. (1995). Analyzing and communicating usability data. SIGCHI Bulletin, 27(1), 22-30.
21. Nielsen, J. (1993). Heuristic evaluation. In J. Nielsen & R. L. Mack (Eds.), Usability inspection methods (pp. 25-62). John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
22. Nørgaard, M., & Høegh, R. T. (2008). Evaluating usability-Using models of argumentation to improve persuasiveness of usability feedback. Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems 2008, 212-221.
23. Nørgaard, M., & Hornbæk, K. (2006). What do usability evaluators do in practice? An explorative study of think-aloud testing. Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 209-218.
24. Oxford Dictionaries, Retrieved from http://www.oxford.com (last accessed February 2007).
25. Redish, J., Bias, R. G., Bailey, R., Molich, R., Dumas, J., & Spool, J. M. (2002). Usability in practice: Formative usability evaluations-Evolution and revolution. ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systemø, 885-890.
26. Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2002). Usability engineering: Scenario-based development of human-computer interaction. Morgan Kaufman, Redwood City, CA.
27. Schell, D. (1986). Usability testing of screen design: Beyond standards, principles, and guidelines. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 30th Meeting, 1212-1215.
28. Sears, A. (1997). Heuristic walkthroughs: Finding the problem without the noise. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 9(3), 213-234.
29. Seffah, A., & Andreevskaia, A. (2003). Empowering software engineers in human-computered design. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 653.
30. Strøm, G. (2003). Perception of human-centered stories and technical descriptions when analyzing and negotiating requirements. Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction, Interact'03, 912-915.