Prescribing records and the first amendment new hampshire's data-mining statute

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 360, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 745-747

  Post, Robert ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENERIC DRUG;

ADVERTIZING; COURT; DATA MINING; DRUG COST; DRUG INDUSTRY; DRUG MARKETING; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LAW; PHYSICIAN; PRESCRIPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL SECRECY; SHORT SURVEY;

EID: 60849092263     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: 15334406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp0810339     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. IMS Health, Inc. v. Ayotte, 550 F.3d 42 (1st Cir. 2008).
2. Post R. Informed consent to abortion: a First Amendment analysis of compelled physician speech. Illinois Law Rev 2007; 2007: 939-90.
3. Central Hudson Gas & Elec. Corp. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 557, 563 (1980).
4. Central Hudson Gas & Elec. Corp. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 557, 566 (1980).
5. Post R. The constitutional status of commercial speech. UCLA Law Rev 2000;48:1-57.