|
|
Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 332-338
|
|
Comparison of 192Ir air kerma calibration coefficients derived at ARPANSA using the interpolation method and at the National Physical Laboratory using a direct measurement
a,e
e
NONE
(Australia)
|
|
Author keywords
192Ir; Comparison; Dosimetry; HDR brachytherapy
|
|
Indexed keywords
AGRICULTURE;
DOSIMETRY;
GAMMA RAYS;
INTERPOLATION;
IRIDIUM;
LABORATORIES;
ONCOLOGY;
POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATES;
RADIOTHERAPY;
CALIBRATION COEFFICIENTS;
COMPARISON;
DIRECT MEASUREMENT;
HDR BRACHYTHERAPY;
HIGH-DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY;
INTERPOLATION METHOD;
NATIONAL PHYSICAL LABORATORY;
STANDARD UNCERTAINTY;
CALIBRATION;
IRIDIUM;
ALGORITHM;
ARTICLE;
AUSTRALIA;
CALIBRATION;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
EVALUATION;
METHODOLOGY;
RADIATION DOSE;
RADIOMETRY;
REFERENCE VALUE;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
STANDARD;
ALGORITHMS;
AUSTRALIA;
CALIBRATION;
IRIDIUM RADIOISOTOPES;
RADIATION DOSAGE;
RADIOMETRY;
REFERENCE VALUES;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
|
|
EID: 60749115906
PISSN: 01589938
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/BF03178603 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (14)
|
|
References (13)
|
