The economic benefits of elk viewing at the jewell meadows wildlife area in Oregon

Human Dimensions of Wildlife

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 51-60

  Donovan, Geoffrey ^a   Champ, Patricia ^b  

^a USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^b ROCKY MOUNTAIN RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Elk; Jewell Meadows; Travel cost method; Wildlife viewing

Indexed keywords

EID: 60749109530     PISSN: 10871209     EISSN: 1533158X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10871200802545773     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Champ, P.A., Boyle, K.J., & Brown, T. C. (2003). A primer on nonmarket valuation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
2. Clayton, C., & Mendelson, R. (1993). The value of watchable wildlife: A case study of McNeil River. Journal of Environmental Management, 39, 101-106.
3. Creel, M. & Loomis, J. B. (1992). Modeling hunting demand in the presence of a bag limit, with tests of alternative specifications. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22, 99-113.
4. Englin, J., & Shonkwiler, J. (1995). Estimating social welfare using count data models: An application under conditions of endogenous stratification and truncation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 77, 104-112.
5. Feather, P., & Shaw, W. D. (1999). Estimating the cost of leisure time for recreation demand models. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 38, 49-65.
6. Freeman, A. M. (2003). The measurement of environmental and resource values, resources for the future. Washington, DC.
7. Greene, W. H., (2000). Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
8. Haab, T. C., & McConnell, K. E., (2002). Valuing environmental and natural resources. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
9. Hilbe, J. M., (2007). Negative binomial regression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Lee, M. E., & Miller, R. (2003). Managing elk in the wildland-urban interface: Attitudes of Flagstaff, Arizona residents. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 31, 185-191.
11. Liston-Heys, C., & Heyes, A. (1999). Recreational benefits of Dartmoor National Park. Environmental Management, 55, 69-80.
12. Livengood, K. R. (1983). Value of big game from markets for hunting leases: The hedonic approach. Land Economics, 59, 287-291.
13. Loomis, J. B. (1995). Four models for determining environmental quality effects on recreation demand and regional economics. Ecological Economics, 12, 55-65.
14. Loomis, J. B., & Caughlan, L. (2004). Linking intended visitation to regional economic impact models of bison and elk management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 9, 17-33.
15. Manfredo, M., & Larson, R. A. (1993). Managing for wildlife viewing recreation experiences: Application in Colorado. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 21, 226-236.
16. Martinez-Espineira, R., Amoako-Tuffour, J., & Hilbe, J. M. (2006). Travel cost demand model based river recreation benefit estimates with on-site and household surveys: Comparative results and a correction procedure - Reevaluation. Water Resources Research, 42, 1-4.
17. McCollum, D. W., & Miller, S. M. (1994). Alaska voters: Their wildlife related trip characteristics and economics. Alaska Department of Fish and Game.
18. McCool, S. F. (1996). Wildlife viewing, natural area protection, and community stability and resiliency. Natural Areas Journal, 16, 147-151.
19. Parsons, G. R. (2003). The travel cost model. In P. A. Champ, K. J. Boyle, & T. C. Brown (Eds.), A primer on nonmarket valuation. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
20. Rosenberger, R. S., & Loomis, J. B. (2001). Benefit transfer of outdoor use values: A technical document supporting the Forest Service strategic plan (2000 revision). Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station: 59.
21. Sarker, R., & Surry, Y. (1998). Economic value of big game hunting: The case of moose hunting in Ontario. Journal of Forest Economics, 4, 29-59.
22. Shafer, E. L., Carline, R., Guldin, R. W., & Cordell, H. K. (1993). Economic amenity values of wildlife: Six case studies in Pennsylvania. Environmental Management, 17, 669-682.