Zuckerman-Kuhlman personality questionnaire: Psychometric properties in a sample of the general population

Psychological Reports

Volumn 103, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 845-856

  Gomà I Freixanet, Montsekrat ^a   Valero, Sergi ^b   Muro, Anna ^a   Albiol, Silvia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARI VALL D HEBRON   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOMETRY; REFERENCE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PSYCHOMETRICS; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 60749109302     PISSN: 00332941     EISSN: 1558691X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.103.7.845-856     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. BALL, S. A. (1995) The validity of an alternative five-factor measure of personality in cocaine abusers. Psychological Assessment, 7, 148-154.
2. COSTA, P. T., TERRACCIANO, A., & MCCRAE, R. R. (2001) Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322-331.
3. DE PASCALIS, V., & RUSSO, P. (2003) Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire: preliminary results of the Italian version. Psychological Reports, 92, 965-974.
4. EYSENCK, H. J. (1991) Dimensions of personality: 16, 5 or 3? Criteria for a taxonomic paradigm. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 773-790.
5. EYSENCK, H. J. (1992) Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 667-673.
6. GOMÀ-I-FREIXANET, M., SOLER, J., VALERO, S., PASCUAL, J. C., & PÉREZ SOLA, V. (2008) DlScriminant validity of the ZKPQ in a sample meeting BPD diagnosis vs normal-range controls. Journal of Personality Disorders, 22, 178-190.
7. GOMÀ-I-FREIXANET, M., & VALERO, S. (2008) Spanish normative data of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ) in a general population sample. Psicothema, 20, 318-324.
8. GOMÀ-I-FREIXANET, M., VALERO, S., PUNTÍ, J., & ZUCKERMAN, M. (2004) Psychometric properties of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire in a Spanish sample. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20, 134-146.
9. GOMÀ-I-FREIXANET, M., WISMEIJER, A. J., & VALERO, S. (2005) Consensual validity parameters of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire: evidence from self-reports and spouse reports. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84, 279-286.
10. GRAY, J. A. (1982) The neuropsychology of anxiety: an enquiry into the functions of the septohippocampal system. New York: Oxford Univer. Press.
11. GUTIÉRREZ-ZOTES, J. A., RAMOS, J. A., & SAIZ, J. (2001) Desarrollo de la versión española del cuestionario de personalidad Zuckerman-Kuhlman (ZKPQ-III) y propiedades psicométricas [Development of the Spanish version of the ZKPQ-III and psychometric properties]. Psiquis, 22, 239-250.
12. JOIREMAN, J., & KUHLMAN, D. M. (2004) The Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire: origin, development, and validity of a measure to assess an alternative five-factor model of personality. In R. M. Stelmack (Ed.), On the psychohiology of personality. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Pp. 49-64.
13. OSTENDORF, F., & ANGLEITNER, A. (1994) A comparison of different instruments proposed to measure the Big Five. European Review of Applied Psychology, 44, 45-53.
14. O'SULLIVAN, D., ZUCKERMAN, M., & KRAFT, M. (1996) The personalities of prostitutes. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 445-448.
15. O'SULLIVAN, D., ZUCKERMAN, M., & KRAFT, M. (1998) Personality characteristics of male and female participants in team sports. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 119-128.
16. SHIOMI, K., KUHLMAN, D. M., ZUCKERMAN, M., JOIREMAN, J., SATO, M., & YATA, S. (1996) Examining the validity and reliability of a Japanese version of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ). Hyago University of Teacher Education Journal, 2, 1-13.
17. THORNQUIST, M. H., & ZUCKERMAN, M. (1995) Psychopathy, passive-avoidance learning and basic dimensions of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 525-534.
18. WU, Y., WANG, W., DU, W., LI, J., JIANG, X., & WANG, Y. (2000) Development of a Chinese version of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire: reliabilities and gender/age effects. Social Behavior and Personality, 28, 241-250.
19. ZUCKERMAN, M. (1992) What is a basic factor and which factors are basic? Turtles all the way down. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 675-681.
20. ZUCKERMAN, M. (2002) Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ): an alternative five-factorial model. In B. De Raad & M. Perugini (Eds.), Big Five assessment. Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber. Pp. 377-396.
21. ZUCKERMAN, M., & KUHLMAN, D. M. (1993) Norms for the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ). (Unpublished manuscript, Univer. of Delaware)
22. ZUCKERMAN, M., & KUHLMAN, D. M. (2000) Personality and risk-taking: common biosocial factors. Journal of Personality, 68, 999-1029.
23. ZUCKERMAN, M., KUHLMAN, D. M., & CAMAC, C. (1988) What lies beyond E and N? Factor analyses of scales believed to measure basic dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 96-107.
24. ZUCKERMAN, M., KUHLMAN, D. M., JOIREMAN, J., TETA, P., & KRAFT, M. (1993) A comparison of three structural models for personality: the big three, the big five, and the alternative five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 757-768.
25. ZUCKERMAN, M., KUHLMAN, D. M., THORNQUIST, M., & KIERS, H. (1991) Five (or three): robust questionnaire scale factors of personality without culture. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 929-941.