Subjective benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in young children after 18 months of implant use

ORL

Volumn 71, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 112-121

  Scherf, Fanny ^a   Van Deun, Lieselot ^b   Van Wieringen, Astrid ^b   Wouters, Jan ^b   Desloovere, Christian ^c   Dhooge, Ingeborg ^d   Offeciers, Erwin ^e   Deggouj, Naïma ^f   De Raeve, Leo ^g   Wuyts, Floris L ^a   Van De Heyning, Paul ^a  

^a ANTWERP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^d GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^e ENT Department   (Belgium)

^f CLINIQUES UNIVERSITAIRES SAINT LUC   (Belgium)

^g CORA CI ^*  (Belgium)

Author keywords

Bilateral cochlear implantation; Quality of life; Subjective benefits

Indexed keywords

AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HEARING; HEARING ACUITY; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; OPEN ENDED QUESTIONNAIRE; PARENT; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; THERAPY EFFECT; WELLBEING;

CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COMMUNICATION; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS, BILATERAL; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; INFANT; MAINSTREAMING (EDUCATION); MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSTHESIS FITTING; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 60749102931     PISSN: 03011569     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000203401     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Tyler RS, Fryauf-Bertschy H, Kelsay DM, Gantz BJ, Woodworth GP, Parkinson A: Speech perception by prelingually deaf children using cochlear implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 117:180-187.
2. Pulsifer MB, Salorio CF, Niparko JK: Developmental, audiological, and speech perception functioning in children after cochlear implant surgery. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2003; 157:552-558.
3. Dowell RC, Dettman SJ, Hill K, Winton E, Barker EJ, Clark GM: Speech perception outcomes in older children who use multichannel cochlear implants: older is not always poorer. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2002; 189:97-101.
4. Kou BS, Shipp DB, Nedzelski JM: Subjective benefits reported by adult Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant users. J Otolaryngol 1994;23:8-14.
5. Wexler M, Miller LW, Berliner KI, Crary WG: Psychological effects of cochlear implant: patient and 'index relative' perceptions. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1982; 91:59-61.
6. Kelsay DMR, Tyler RS: Advantages and disadvantages expected and realized by pediatric cochlear implant recipients as reported by their parents. Am J Otol 1996; 17:866-873.
7. Tobey EA, Rekart D, Buckley K, Geers AE: Mode of communication and classroom placement impact on speech intelligibility. Arch Otolaryngol head Neck Surg 2004;130: 639-643.
8. Chmiel R, Sutton L, Jenkins H: Quality of life in children with cochlear implants. Am Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2000; 185:103-105.
9. Sach TH, Whynes DK: Paediatric cochlear implantation: the views of parents. Int J Audiol 2005;44:400-407.
10. Stacey PC, Fortnum HM, Barton GR, Summerfield AQ: Hearing-impaired children in the United Kingdom. I. Auditory performance, communication skills, educational achievements, quality of life, and cochlear implantation. Ear Hear 2006;27:161-186.
11. Huber M: Health-related quality of life of Austrian children and adolescents with cochlear implants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2005;69:1089-1101.
12. Summerfield AQ, Marshall DH: Paediatric cochlear implantation and health-technology assessment. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1999;47: 141-151.
13. Vermeire K, Brokx JP, Van de Heyning PH, Cochet E, Carpentier H: Bilateral cochlear implantation in children: a case report. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2003;67:67-70.
14. Scherf F, Van Deun L, van Wieringen A, Wou ters J, Desloovere C, Dhooge I, Offeciers E, Deggouj N, De Raeve L, De Bodt M, Van de Heyning PH: Hearing benefits of secondside cochlear implantation in two groups of children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2007;71:1855-1863.
15. Steffens T, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Strutz J, Aschendorff A, Klenzner T, Rühl S, Voss B, Wesarg T, Laszig, R, Lenarz T: The benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation for hearing-impaired children. Acta Otolaryngol 2008;128: 164-176.
16. Beijen JW, Snik AF, Mylanus EA: Sound localization ability of young children with bilateral cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol 2007;28:479-485.
17. Winkler F, Schön F, Peklo L, Müller J, Feinen Ch, Helms J: The Würzburg questionnaire for assessing the quality of hearing in CIchildren (WH-CIK). Laryngorhinootologie 2002;81:211-216.
18. Schauwers K, Gillis S, Daemers K, De Beukelaer C, De Ceulaer G, Yperman M, Govaerts PJ: Normal hearing and language development in a deaf-born child. Otol Neurotol 2004;25:924-929.
19. Galvin KL, Mok M, Dowell RC: Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2007;28:470-482.
20. Sharma A, Dorman MF, Kral A: The influence of a sensitive period on central auditory development in children with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants. Hear Res 2005; 203:134-143.
21. Manrique M, Cervera-Paz FJ, Huarte A, Molina M: Prospective long-term auditory results of cochlear implantation in prelinguistically deafened children: the importance of early implantation. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 2004:55-63.
22. Archbold S, Lutman ME, Marshall DH: Categories of auditory performance. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995;166:312-314.
23. Francis HW, Koch ME, Wyatt JR, Niparko JK: Trends in educational placement and cost-benefits considerations in children with cochlear implants. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125:499-505.
24. Archbold S: Speech perception: categories of auditory performance. Four years after implant. Lecture at Advanced Bionics Workshop Nottingham, 2006.
25. Govaerts PJ, De Beukelaer C, Daemers K, De Ceulaer G, Yperman M, Someres T, Schatteman I, Offeciers FE: Outcome of cochlear implantation at different ages from 0 to 6 years. Otol Neurotol 2002;23:885-890.