Common morality and moral reform

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 55-68

  Wallace, K A ^a  

^a HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Beauchamp; Childress; Common morality; Ethics; Foundational; Gert; Moral reform; Morality; Pragmatic; Pragmatism

Indexed keywords

BENEFICENCE; BIOETHICAL ISSUES; ETHICAL ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; MORALS; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; SOCIAL JUSTICE;

EID: 60749093015     PISSN: 13867415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11017-009-9096-2     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Gert, Bernard. 2005. Morality: Its nature and justification, revised ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Gert, Bernard. 2004. Common morality: Deciding what to do. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Beauchamp, Tom L., and J.F. Childress. 2001. Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Beauchamp, Tom L. 2003. A defense of the common morality. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (3): 259-274.
5. Strong, Carson. 2008. Justifying group-specific common morality. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29: 1-15.
6. MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1981. After virtue: A study in moral theory. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
7. MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1988. Whose justice? Which rationality? South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
8. Turner, Leigh. 2003. Zones of consensus and zones of conflict: Questioning the 'common morality' presumption in bioethics. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (3): 193-218.
9. Wolfe, Alan. 2008. Pew in the pews: A survey on American belief overturns some scholars' theories. The Chronicle Review of The Chronicle of Higher Education, 21 Mar 2008: B5-B6.
10. Kaveny, M. Cathleen. 2005. Between example and doctrine: Contract law and common morality. Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (4): 669-695.
11. Gert, Bernard. 2005. Moral arrogance and moral theories. Nous Supplement Philosophical Issues, Normativity 15: 368-385.
12. Rauprich, Oliver. 2008. Common morality: Comment on Beauchamp and Childress. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29: 43-71.
13. DeGrazia, David. 2003. Common morality, coherence, and the principles of biomedical ethics. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (3): 219-230.
14. Gert, Bernard, C.J. Culver, and K.D. Clouser. 2000. Common morality versus specified principlism: Reply to Richardson. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (3): 308-322.
15. Wallace, Kathleen. 2007. Moral reform, moral disagreement, and abortion. Metaphilosophy 38 (4): 380-403.
16. Arras, John D. 2001. Freestanding pragmatism in law and bioethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22: 69-85.
17. Raz, Joseph. 1994. Moral change and social relativism. Social Philosophy and Policy: Cultural Pluralism and Moral Knowledge 11 (1): 139-158.
18. Ross, W.D. 1939. The foundations of ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Jansen, Lynn A. 1998. Assessing clinical pragmatism. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (1): 23-36.
20. Tong, Rosemarie. 1997. The promises and perils of pragmatism: Commentary on Fins, Bacchetta, and Miller. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (2): 147-152.