Multi-scenario multi-objective optimization with applications in engineering design

Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems

Volumn 618, Issue , 2009, Pages 283-298

  Wiecek, Margaret M ^a   Blouin, Vincent Y ^b   Fadel, Georges M ^b   Engau, Alexander ^b   Hunt, Brian J ^b   Singh, Vijay ^b  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Engineering design; Multi objective optimization; Multi scenario optimization; Preferences

Indexed keywords

EID: 60649119869     PISSN: 00758442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85646-7_26     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Automotive Research Center (1997) ArcSim User Reference Manual. ARC, Ann Arbor, USA
2. El-Gindy M, Woodrooffe J, White D (1991) Evaluation of the dynamic performance of heavy commercial vehicles. In: ASME Annual Meeting, Symposium on Advanced Automotive Technologies, vol. DE 40, pp 1-6
3. Engau A (2007) Preferences and tradeoffs in multiobjective programming. Dissertation, Clemson University, South Carolina, USA
4. Engau A, Wiecek M (2007) Exact generation of epsilon-efficient solutions in multiple objective programming. OR Spectrum 29:335-350
5. Engau A, Wiecek M (2007) Generating epsilon-efficient solutions in multiobjective programming. Eur J Oper Res 177:1566-1579
6. Fadel G, Haque I, Blouin V, Wiecek M (2005) Multi-criteria multi-scenario approaches in the design of vehicles. In: Herskovits J, Mazorche S, Canelas A (eds) Proceedings of 6th World Congresses of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Available online at http://www.wcsmo6.org/ papers/6391.pdf
7. Fellini R, Kokkolaras M, Papalambros P, Perez-Duarte A (2002) Platform selection under performance loss constraints in optimal design of product families. J Mech Design 127:524-535
8. Geoffrion A (1968) Proper efficiency and the theory of vector maximization. J Math Anal Appl 22:618-630
9. Gobbi M, Mastinu G (2002) Symbolic multiobjective optimization of the dynamic behaviour of actively suspended road vehicles. Int J Vehicle Design 28:189-213
10. Hunt B (2004) Multiobjective programming with convex cones: methodology and applications. Dissertation, Clemson University, South Carolina, USA
11. Hunt B, Wiecek. M (2003) Cones to aid decision-making in multicritreia programming. In: Tanino T, Tanaka T, Inuiguchi M (eds) Multi-objective programming and goal programming: theory and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 153-158
12. Hunt B, Blouin V, Wiecek M (2007) Modeling relative importance of design criteria with a modified Pareto preference. J Mech Design 129:907-914
13. Kouvelis P, Yu G (1997) Robust discrete optimization and its applications. Kluwer, Dordrecht
14. Noghin V (1997) Relative importance of criteria: A quantitative approach. J Multicrit Decision Anal 6:355-363
15. Pareto V (1896) Cours d'conomie politique. Rouge, Lausanne
16. Sawaragi Y, Nakayama H, Tanino T (1985) Theory of multiobjective optimization. Academic Press, Orlando
17. Singh V (2001) Multi-scenario multi-criteria optimization in engineering design. MS Thesis, Clemson University, South Carolina, USA
18. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J (1990) Sensitivity analysis and multidisciplinary optimization for aircraft design: recent advances and results. J Aircraft 27:993-1001
19. Wiecek M (2007) Advances in cone-based preference modelling for decision making with multiple criteria. Decision Making Manufact Serv 1:151-171
20. Yu PL (1974) Cone convexity, cone extreme points, and nondominated solutions in decision problems with multiobjectives. J Optim Theory Appl 14:319-377