Evaluation of the dental structure loss produced during maintenance and replacement of occlusal amalgam restorations

Brazilian Oral Research

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 242-246

  Sardenberg, Fernanda ^a   Bonifácio, Clarissa Calil ^b,c   Braga, Mariana Minatel ^b   Imparato, José Carlos Pettorossi ^b   Mendes, Fausto Medeiros ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Dental amalgam; Dental restoration failure; Dental restoration, permanent; Dentistry, operative

Indexed keywords

EID: 60649117389     PISSN: 18068324     EISSN: 18073107     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1806-83242008000300009     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Adegbembo AO, Watson PA. Removal, replacement and placement of amalgam restorations by Ontario dentists in 2002. J Can Dent Assoc. 2005;71(8):565.
2. Setcos JC, Khosravi R, Wilson NH, Shen C, Yang M, Mjor IA. Repair or replacement of amalgam restorations: decisions at a USA and a UK dental school. Oper Dent. 2004;29(4):392-7.
3. Anusavice KJ. Criteria for placement and replacement of dental restorations. Fla Dent J. 1988;59(2):30-1.
4. Elderton RJ. Overtreatment with restorative dentistry: when to intervene? Int Dent J. 1993;43(1):17-24.
5. Penning C. Repair and revision 1. Repair or replacement of amalgam. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2001;108(2):46-9.
6. Maryniuk GA, Brunson WD. When to replace faulty-margin amalgam restorations: a pilot study. Gen Dent. 1989;37(6):463-7.
7. Pimenta LA, Navarro MF, Consolaro A. Secondary caries around amalgam restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;74(3):219-22.
8. Kidd EAM, O'Hara JW. The caries status of occlusal amalgam restorations with marginal defects. J Dent Res. 1990;69(6):1275-7.
9. Mjor IA. Repair versus replacement of failed restorations. Int Dent J. 1993;43(5):466-72.
10. Soderholm K, Antonson DE, Fischelsschwerger W. Correlation between marginal discrepancies at the amalgam/tooth interface and recurrent caries. In: Anusavice KJ. Quality evaluation of dental restorations/International Symposium on Criteria for Placement and Replacement of Dental Restorations. Lake Buena Vista, Florida, October 19-21, 1987. Chicago: Quintessence Book; 1989. p. 97-107.
11. Gordan VV, Riley JL 3rd, Blaser PK, Mjor IA. 2-year clinical evaluation of alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations. Oper Dent. 2006;31(4):418-25.
12. Crim GA, Garcia-Godoy F. Microleakage: the effect of storage and cycling duration. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;57(5):574-6.
13. Elderton RJ. Clinical studies concerning re-restoration of teeth. Adv Dent Res. 1990;4:4-9.
14. Goldfogel MH, Smith GE, Bronberg TJ. Amalgam polishing. Oper Dent. 1976;1(4):146-50.
15. Baratieri LN, Ritter AV. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2001:13(1):50-7.
16. Boyd MA, Richardson AS. Frequency of amalgam replacement in general dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc. 1985;51(10):763-6.
17. Cardoso M, Baratieri LN, Ritter AV. The effect of finishing and polishing on the decision to replace existing amalgam restorations. Quintessence Int. 1999;30(6):413-8.
18. Cipriano TM, Santos JF. Clinical behavior of repaired amalgam restorations: a two-year study. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73(1):8-11.
19. Oleinisky JC, Baratieri LN, Ritter AV, Felipe LA, de Freitas SF. Influence of finishing and polishing procedures in the decision to replace old amalgam restorations - An in vitro study. Quintessence Int. 1996;27(12):833-40.
20. Smales RJ, Hawthorne WS. Long-term survival of repaired amalgams, recemented crowns and gold castings. Oper Dent. 2004;29(3):249-53.