The language of intoxication: Preliminary investigations

Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 448-454

  Levitt, Ash ^a   Sher, Kenneth J ^b   Bartholow, Bruce D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Alcohol; Intoxication; Language; Self Report; Subjective Effects

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; DRUNK SENSATION; DRUNKENNESS; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; NOMENCLATURE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF REPORT; SEX DIFFERENCE; UNIVERSITY STUDENT;

ADOLESCENT; ALCOHOLIC INTOXICATION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; STUDENTS; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC; VOCABULARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 60649113952     PISSN: 01456008     EISSN: 15300277     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00855.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bentler PM (1990) Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull 107 : 238 246.
2. Bentler PM (1995) EQS Structural Equations Program Manual. Multivariate Software, Encino, CA.
3. Bentler PM, Bonett DG (1980) Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull 88 : 588 606.
4. Browne MW, Cudeck R (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit, in Testing Structural Equation Models (Bollen KA, Long JS eds pp 132 162. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
5. Cameron D, Thomas M, Madden S, Thornton C, Bergmark A, Garretsen H, Terzidou M (2000) Intoxicated across Europe: in search of meaning. Addict Res 8 : 233 242.
6. Chen CM, Dufour MC, Yi H (2004/2005) Alcohol consumption among young adults ages 18-24 in the United States: results from the 2001-2001 NESARC survey. Alcohol Res Health 28 : 269 280.
7. Cliff N (1983) Some cautions concerning the application of causal modeling methods. Multivariate Behav Res 18 : 115 126.
8. Del Boca FK, Darkes J (2003) The validity of self-reports of alcohol consumption: state of the science and challenges for research. Addiction 98 : 1 12.
9. Del Boca FK, Noll JA (2000) Truth or consequences: the validity of self-report data in health services research on addictions. Addiction 95 : s347 s360.
10. Dowdall GW, Wechsler H (2002) Studying college alcohol use: widening the lens, sharpening the focus. J Stud Alcohol Suppl 14 : 14 22.
11. Haas A (1979) Male and female spoken language differences: stereotypes and evidence. Psychol Bull 86 : 615 626.
12. Jackson KM, Sher KJ, Gotham HJ, Wood PK (2001) Transitioning into and out of large-effect drinking in young adulthood. J Abnorm Psychol 110 : 378 391.
13. Kaskutas LA, Graves K (2000) An alternative to standard drinks as a measure of alcohol consumption. J Subst Abuse 12 : 67 78.
14. Kerr WC, Greenfield TK, Midanik LT (2006) How many drinks does it take you to feel drunk? Trends and predictors for subjective drunkenness. Addiction 101 : 1428 1437.
15. Kerr WC, Greenfield TK, Tujague J, Brown SE (2005) A drink is a drink? Variation in the amount of alcohol contained in beer, wine, and spirits drinks in a US methodological sample. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 29 : 2015 2021.
16. Levine HG (1981) The vocabulary of drunkenness. J Stud Alcohol 42 : 1038 1051.
17. Lewis MA, Neighbors C (2004) Gender-specific misperceptions of college student drinking norms. Psychol Addict Behav 18 : 334 339.
18. Lewis MA, Neighbors C, Oster-Aaland L, Kirkeby BS, Larimer ME (2007) Indicated prevention for incoming freshmen: personalized normative feedback and high-risk drinking. Addict Behav 32 : 2495 2508.
19. Midanik LT (1999) Drunkenness, feeling the effects, and 5 + measures. Addiction 94 : 887 897.
20. Midanik LT (2003) Definitions of drunkenness. Subst Use Misuse 38 : 1285 1303.
21. Muthen LK, Muthen BO (1998-2004) Mplus User's Guide. Muthen & Muthen, Los Angels, CA.
22. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (2004) NIAAA Newsletter. Winter 2004. Available at: http://pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/ Newsletter/winter2004/Newsletter-Number3.pdf. Accessed August 7, 2008.
23. Oxford English Dictionary (2nd ed) (1989) OED Online. 4 April 2000. Oxford University Press, New York.
24. Sher KJ, Epler AJ (2004) Alcoholic denial: self-awareness and beyond, in Self-Awareness Deficits in Psychiatric Patients: Neurobiology, Assessment, and Treatment (Beitman BD, Nair J eds pp 184 212. Norton, New York.
25. Sher KJ, Wood MD (2005) Subjective effects of alcohol II, in Mind-Altering Drugs: The Science of Subjective Experience (Earlywine M ed. pp 135 153. Oxford University Press, New York.
26. Sher KJ, Wood MD, Richardson AE, Jackson KM (2005) Subjective effects of alcohol I: effects of the drink and drinking context, in Mind-Altering Drugs: The Science of Subjective Experience (Earlywine M ed. pp 86 134. Oxford University Press, New York.
27. Steiger JH (1989) EzPATH: Causal Modeling. SYSTAT, Evanston, IL.
28. Tucker LR, Lewis C (1973) A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 38 : 1 10.
29. Valencia-Martin JL, Galan I, Rodriguez-Artalejo F (2008) The joint association of average volume of alcohol and binge drinking with hazardous driving behaviour and traffic crashes. Addiction 103 : 749 757.
30. White AM, Kraus CL, Flom JD, Kestenbaum LA, Mitchell JR, Shah K, Swartzwelder HS (2005) College students lack knowledge of standard drink volumes: implications for definitions of risky drinking based on survey data. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 29 : 631 638.
31. White AM, Kraus CL, McCracken LA, Swartzwelder HS (2003) Do college students drink more than they know? Use of a free-pour paradigm to determine how college students define standard drinks. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 27 : 1750 1756.