Reappraisal of HLA Antibody Analysis and Crossmatching in Kidney Transplantation

Transplantation Proceedings

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 95-98

  Lee, P C ^a   Ozawa, M ^a   Hung, C J ^a   Lin, Y J ^a   Chang, S S ^a   Chou, T C ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HLA ANTIBODY; HLA ANTIGEN CLASS 1; HLA ANTIGEN CLASS 2;

ARTICLE; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HLA MATCHING; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ANTIBODY SPECIFICITY; ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGENS CLASS I; HISTOCOMPATIBILITY TESTING; HLA ANTIGENS; HLA-D ANTIGENS; HUMANS; ISOANTIBODIES; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 60649098357     PISSN: 00411345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.10.074     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Zeevi A., Girnita A., and Duquesnoy R. HLA antibody analysis: sensitivity, specificity, and clinical significance in solid organ transplantation. Immunol Res 36 (2006) 255
2. Yang C.W., Oh E.J., Lee S.B., et al. Detection of donorspecific anti-HLA class I and II antibodies using antibody monitoring system. Transplant Proc 38 (2006) 2803
3. Suciu-Foca N., Reed E., D'Agati V.D., et al. Soluble antigens, anti-HLA antibodies, and antiidiotypic antibodies in the circulation of renal transplant recipients. Transplantation 51 (1991) 593
4. Pei R., Lee J.H., Shih N.J., et al. Single human leukocyte antigen flow cytometry beads for accurate identification of human keukocyte antigen antibody specificities. Transplantation 75 (2003) 43
5. Vaidya S., Partlow D., Susskind B., et al. Prediction of crossmatch outcome of highly sensitized patients by single and/or multiple antigen bead Luminex assay. Transplantation 82 (2006) 1524
6. Patel R., and Terasaki P.I. Significance of the positive crossmatch test in kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med 280 (1969) 735
7. Bray R.A., Nickerson P.W., Kerman R.H., et al. Evolution of HLA antibody detection: technology emulating biology. Immunol Res 29 (2004) 41
8. Süsal C., and Opelz G. Options for immunologic support of renal transplantation through the HLA and immunology laboratories. Am J Transplant 7 (2007) 1450
9. Pelletier R.P., Adams P.W., Hennessy P.K., et al. Comparison of crossmatch results obtained by ELISA, flow cytometry, and conventional methodologies. Human Immunol 60 (1999) 855
10. Altermann W.W., Seliger B., Sel S., et al. Comparison of the established standard complement-dependent cytotoxicity and flow cytometric crossmatch assays with a novel ELISA-based HLA crossmatch procedure. Histol Histopathol 21 (2006) 1115
11. Conca R., Pratico-Barbato L., Dall'Omo A.M., et al. The Italian quality control scheme for crossmatching procedures and HLA screening. Arch Pathol Lab Med 129 (2005) 1470
12. Gebel H.M., and Bray R.A. Laboratory assessment of HLA antibodies circa 2006: making sense of sensitivity. Tranplant Rev 20 (2006) 189
13. Bielmann D., Honger G., Lutz D., et al. Pretransplant risk assessment in renal allograft recipients using virtual crossmatching. Am J Transplant 7 (2007) 626
14. Susskind B. Methods for histocompatibility testing in the 21st century. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 12 (2007) 393
15. Piazza A., Poggi E., Ozzella G., et al. Public epitope specificity of HLA class I antibodies induced by a failed kidney transplant: alloantibody characterization by flow cytometric techniques. Transplantation 81 (2006) 1298
16. Adams A.B., Pearson T.C., and Larsen C.P. Heterologous immunity: an overlooked barrier to tolerance. Immunol Rev 196 (2003) 147
17. Bryan C.F., McDonald S.B., Luger A.M., et al. Flow cytometry beads rather than the antihuman globulin method should be used to detect HLA class I IgG antibody (PRA) in cadaveric renal regraft candidates. Clin Transplant 16 suppl (2002) 15