Contrast enhancement and tissues classification of breast MRI using Kalman filter-based linear mixing method

Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 187-196

  Yang, Sheng Chih ^a   Wang, Chuin Mu ^a   Hsu, Hsian He ^b   Chung, Pau Choo ^c   Hsu, Giu Cheng ^b   Juan, Chun Jung ^b   Lo, Chien Shun ^d  

^a NATIONAL CHIN YI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b TRI SERVICE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d NATIONAL FORMOSA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Breast cancer screening; Breast MRI; Contrast enhancement; Kalman filter; Linear spectral mixture model; Tissue classification

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER SCREENING; BREAST MRI; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; LINEAR SPECTRAL MIXTURE MODEL; TISSUE CLASSIFICATION;

CONTROL THEORY; HISTOLOGY; IMAGE SENSORS;

KALMAN FILTERS;

ARTICLE; BREAST; BREAST NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KALMAN FILTER BASED LINEAR MIXING METHOD; MEASUREMENT ERROR; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ALGORITHMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LINEAR MODELS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 60649091473     PISSN: 08956111     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2008.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. http://www.mrsc.ucsf.edu/breast/
2. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system- magnetic resonance imaging, 1st ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2003.
3. Kuhl C.K., Schmutzler R.K., Leutner C.C., Kempe A., Wardelmann E., Hocke A., et al. Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results 1. Radiology 215 (2000) 267-279
4. Heywang-Kobrunner S., and Beck R. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast. 2nd edition (1996), Springer-Verlag
5. Chang C.-I., and Brumbley C. A Kalman filtering approach to multispectral image classification and detection of changes in signature abundance. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 37 January (1999) 257-268
6. Haykin S. Adaptive filtering theory. 3rd edition (1996), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
7. Wang C.M., Chen C.C., Chung Y.N., and Yang S.C. Detection of spectral signatures in multispectral MR images for classification. IEEE Trans Med Imag 12 1 (January) (2003) 50-61
8. Wang C.M., Chen C.C., and Yang S.C. An unsupervised orthogonal subspace projection approach to MR image classification. Opt Eng 41 July (2002) 1546-1557
9. Wang C.M., and Yang S.C. Orthogonal subspace projection-base approaches to classification of MR images sequences. Comput Med Imag Graph 25 6 (December) (2001) 465-476
10. Schalkoff R. Pattern recognition: statistical, structural and neural approaches (1992), Wiley, New York
11. Duda R.O., and Hart P.E. Pattern classification and scene analysis (1973), Wiley, New York
12. Chang C.-I., and Ren H. An experiment-based quantitative and comparative analysis of hyperspectral target detection and image classification algorithms. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 38 March (2000) 1044-1063
13. Chang C.-I., Ren H., Du Q., Chiang S.-S., and Ifarraguerri A. An ROC analysis for subpixel detection. Presented at the IEEE 2001 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Sydney, Australia, July 24-28 (2001)
14. Metz C.E. ROC methodology in radiological imaging. Invest Radiol 21 (1986) 720-723