Nanofluids and critical heat flux, experimental and analytical study

Applied Thermal Engineering

Volumn 29, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1281-1288

  Golubovic, M N ^a   Madhawa Hettiarachchi, H D ^a   Worek, W M ^a   Minkowycz, W J ^a  

^a 1120 Science and Engineering Offices   (United States)

Author keywords

Boiling; Critical heat flux; Nanofluids

Indexed keywords

FLUIDS; HEAT FLUX; NANOPARTICLES;

ANALYTICAL MODELING; BOILING; CRITICAL HEAT FLUX; NANOFLUIDS; PARTICLE CONCENTRATIONS; POOL BOILING; RESEARCH COMMUNITIES; SATURATED CONDITIONS;

NANOFLUIDICS;

EID: 60649090388     PISSN: 13594311     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2008.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. U.S. Choi, Developments and Applications of Non-Newtonian Flows, ASME FED-Vol. 231/MD, vol. 66, 1995, pp. 99-105.
2. Lee S., Choi S.U.S., Li S., and Eastman J.A. ASME Journal of Heat Transfer 121 (1999) 280
3. Eastman J.A., Choi S.U.S., Li S., Yu W., and Thompson L.J. Anomalously increased effective thermal conductivities of ethylene glycol based nanofluids containing copper nanoparticles. Applied Physics Letters 78 (2001) 718-720
4. Choi S.U.S., Zhang Z.G., Yu W., Lockwood F.E., and Grulke E.A. Anomalous thermal conductivity enhancement in nanotube suspensions. Applied Physics Letters 79 (2001) 2252-2254
5. You S.M., Kim J., and Kim K.H. Effect of nanoparticles on critical heat flux of water in pool boiling heat transfer. Applied Physics Letters 83 (2003) 3374-3376
6. N. Zuber, Hydrodynamic Aspects of Boiling Heat Transfer, Ph.D Dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California at Los Angeles, California, USA, 1959.
7. Lienhard J.H., and Dhir V.K. Hydrodynamic prediction of peak pool boiling heat fluxes from finite bodies. ASME Journal of Heat Transfer 95 (1973) 477-482
8. Haramura Y., and Katto Y. A new hydrodynamic model of CHF applicable widely to both pool and forced convection boiling on submerged bodies in saturated liquids. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 26 (1983) 389-399
9. Rosenhow W., and Griffith P. Correlation of maximum heat flux data for boiling of saturated liquids. Chemical Engineering Progress Symposium Series 52 (1956) 47-49
10. Unal C., Daw V., and Nelson R.A. Unifying the controlling mechanism for the critical heat flux and quenching: the ability of liquid to contact the hot surface. ASME Journal of Heat Transfer 114 (1993) 972-982
11. Ramilison J.M., Sadasivan P., and Lienhard J.H. Surface factors influencing burnout on flat heaters. ASME Journal of Heat Transfer 114 (1992) 287-290
12. Berenson P.J. Experiments on pool boiling heat transfer. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 5 (1962) 985-999
13. Dhir V.K., and Liaw S.P. Framework for a unified model for nucleate and transition pool boiling. ASME Journal of Heat Transfer 111 (1989) 3739-3746
14. Han C.Y., and Griffith P. The mechanism of heat transfer in nucleate pool boiling-Part I: Bubble initiation, growth and departure. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 8 (1965) 887-904
15. Vassallo P., Kumar R., and Amico S.D. Pool boiling heat transfer experiments in silica-water nanofluids. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 47 (2004) 407-411
16. 2 nanofluids. Nuclear Engineering and Technology 38 1 (2006)
17. Kim S.J., Bang I.C., Buongiorno J., and Hu L.W. Surface wettability change during pool boiling of nanofluids and its effect on CHF. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 50 (2007) 4105-4116
18. 3-water nanofluids from a plain surface in a pool. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 48 (2005) 2407-2419
19. Kim H., Kim J., and Kim M. Experimental studies on CHF characteristics of nanofluids at pool boiling. International Journal of Multiphase Flow 33 (2007) 691-706
20. Sefiane K. On the role of structural disjoining pressure and contact line pinning in critical heat flux enhancement during boiling of nanofluids. Applied Physics Letters 89 4 (2006)