The Effect of Three Composite Fiber Insertion Techniques on Fracture Resistance of Root-filled Teeth

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 413-416

  Oskoee, Parnian Alizadeh ^a   Ajami, Amir Ahmad ^a   Navimipour, Elmira Jafari ^a   Oskoee, Siavash Savadi ^a   Sadjadi, Jafar ^a  

^a TABRIZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Fiber reinforced composite; fracture resistance; glass fiber

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; FILTEK FLOW; FILTEK Z250; GLASS; GLASS FIBER; RESIN;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH PULP DISEASE;

BICUSPID; COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL BONDING, LIGHT-CURED; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; GLASS; HUMANS; MAXILLA; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURES; TOOTH, NONVITAL;

EID: 60649086768     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.11.027     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Wagnild G., and Muller K. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. In: Cohen S., and Hargreaves K.M. (Eds). Pathways of the pulp. 9th ed (2006), Mosby Co, St Louis 786-821
2. Belli S., Erdemir A., Ozcopur M., et al. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite. Int Endod J 38 (2005) 73-80
3. Belli S., Erdemir A., and Yildirim C. Reinforcement effect of polyethylene fiber in root filled teeth: comparison of two restoration techniques. Int Endod J 39 (2006) 136-142
4. Hernadez R., Bader S., Boston D., et al. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated premolars restored with new generation dentine bonding systems. Int Endod J 27 (1994) 281-284
5. Kemp-Scholte C.M., and Davidson C.L. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent 64 (1990) 658-664
6. Van Meerbeek B., Lambrechts P., Inokoshi S., et al. Factors affecting adhesion to mineralized tissues. Oper Dent 5 Suppl (1992) 111-112
7. Vallittu P.K. The effect of glass fiber reinforcement on the fracture resistance of a provisional fixed partial denture. J Prosthet Dent 79 (1998) 125-130
8. Robbins J.W. Restoration of endodentically treated teeth. In: Summitt J.B., Robbins J.W., Hilton T.J., et al. (Eds). Fundamentals of operative dentistry-A contemporary approach. 3rd ed (2006), Quintessence, Chicago 570-587
9. Oskoee S.S., Oskoee P.A., Navimipour E.J., et al. In vitro fracture resistance of endodontically-treated maxillary premolars. Oper Dent 32 (2007) 510-514
10. Soares C.J., Soares P.V., de Freitas Santos-Filho P.C., et al. The influence of cavity design and glass fiber posts on biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars. J Endod 34 (2008) 1015-1019
11. Uyehara M.Y., Davis R.D., and Overton J.D. Cuspal reinforcement in endodontically treated molars. Oper Dent 24 (1999) 364-370
12. El-Badrawy W.A. Cuspal deflection of maxillary premolars restored with bonded amalgam. Oper Dent 24 (1999) 337-343
13. Sakaguchi R.L., Brust E.W., Cross M., et al. Independent movement of cusps during occlusal loading. Dent Mater 7 (1991) 186-190
14. Panitvisai P., and Messer H.H. Cuspal deflection in molars in relation to endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod 21 (1995) 57-61
15. Hürmüzlü F., Kiremitçi A., Serper A., et al. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with ormocer and packable composite. J Endod 29 (2003) 838-840
16. Ferracane J.L., Mitchem J.C., Condon J.R., et al. Wear and marginal breakdown of composites with various degrees of cure. J Dent Res 76 (1997) 1508-1516
17. Suzuki S., Suzuki S.H., and Cox C.F. Evaluating the antagonistic wear of restorative materials when placed against human enamel. J Am Dent Assoc 127 (1996) 74-80
18. Donly K.J., Jensen M.E., Triolo P., et al. A clinical comparison of resin composite inlay and onlay posterior restorations and cast-gold restorations at 7 years. Quintessence Int 30 (1999) 163-168
19. Aydin C., Yilmaz H., and Caglar A. Effect of glass fiber reinforcement on the flexural strength of different denture base resins. Quintessence Int 33 (2002) 457-463
20. Schreiber C.K. Polymethylmethacrylate reinforced with carbon fibres. Br Dent J 130 (1971) 29-30
21. Larson W.R., Dixon D.L., Aquilino S.A., et al. The effect of carbon graphite fiber reinforcement on the strength of provisional crown and fixed partial denture resins. J Prosthet Dent 66 (1991) 816-820
22. Yazdanie N., and Mahood M. Carbon fiber acrylic resin composite: an investigation of transverse strength. J Prosthet Dent 54 (1985) 543-547
23. Vallittu P.K. Ultra-high-modulus polyethylene ribbon as reinforcement for denture polymethyl methacrylate: a short communication. Dent Mater 13 (1997) 381-382
24. Ramos Jr. V., Runyan D.A., and Christensen L.C. The effect of plasma-treated polyethylene fiber on the fracture strength of polymethyl methacrylate. J Prosthet Dent 76 (1996) 94-96
25. Xu H.H., Schumacher G.E., Eichmiller F.C., et al. Continuous-fiber preform reinforcement of dental resin composite restorations. Dent Mater 19 (2003) 523-530
26. Al-Darwish M., Hurley R.K., and Drummond J.L. Flexure strength evaluation of a laboratory-processed fiber-reinforced composite resin. J Prosthet Dent 97 (2007) 266-270
27. Kolbeck C., Rosentritt M., Behr M., et al. In vitro study of fracture strength and marginal adaptation of polyethylene-fibre-reinforced-composite versus glass-fibre-reinforced-composite fixed partial dentures. J Oral Rehabil 29 (2002) 668-674
28. Dyer S.R., Lassila L.V., Jokinen M., et al. Effect of fiber position and orientation on fracture load of fiber-reinforced composite. Dent Mater 20 (2004) 947-955
29. Ellakwa A.E., Shortall A.C., Shehata M.K., et al. The influence of fibre placement and position on the efficiency of reinforcement of fibre reinforced composite bridgework. J Oral Rehabil 28 (2001) 785-791
30. Hamza T.A., Rosenstiel S.F., Elhosary M.M., et al. The effect of fiber reinforcement on the fracture toughness and flexural strength of provisional restorative resins. J Prosthet Dent 91 (2004) 258-264
31. Fennis W.M., Tezvergil A., Kuijs R.H., et al. In vitro fracture resistance of fiber reinforced cusp-replacing composite restorations. Dent Mater 21 (2005) 565-572