Primary versus secondary tracheoesophageal puncture in salvage total laryngectomy following chemoradiation

Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Volumn 140, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 386-390

  Emerick, Kevin S ^a   Tomycz, Luke ^b   Bradford, Carol R ^a   Lyden, Teresa H ^c   Chepeha, Douglas B ^a   Wolf, Gregory T ^a   Teknos, Theodoros N ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^d THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY WEXNER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ADULT; ADVANCED CANCER; ARTICLE; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESOPHAGUS BIOPSY; ESOPHAGUS STENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; LARYNGECTOMY; LARYNX CANCER; MALE; MUSCLE SPASM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSTHESIS; PULMONARY ASPIRATION; PUNCTURE; SALVAGE THERAPY; SPEECH ANALYSIS; TRACHEOESOPHAGEAL FISTULA; TRACHEOESOPHAGEAL PUNCTURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VOICE; WOUND HEALING; WOUND INFECTION;

COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; COMORBIDITY; CUTANEOUS FISTULA; FISTULA; HUMANS; LARYNGEAL NEOPLASMS; LARYNGECTOMY; LARYNX, ARTIFICIAL; MIDDLE AGED; OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; PHARYNGEAL DISEASES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PUNCTURES; SALVAGE THERAPY; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH, ALARYNGEAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 60549111614     PISSN: 01945998     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.10.018     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Singer M.I., and Blom E.D. An endoscopic technique for restoration of voice after laryngectomy. Ann Otol 89 (1980) 529-533
2. Cheng E., Ho M., Ganz C., et al. Outcomes of primary and secondary tracheoesophageal puncture: A 16-year retrospective analysis. ENT 85 (2006) 262-267
3. Trudeau M.D., Schuller D.E., and Hall D.A. The timing of tracheoesophageal puncture for voice restoration: primary vs secondary. Head Neck Surg 10 (1988) 130-134
4. Wenig B.L., Levy J., Mullooly V., et al. Voice restoration following laryngectomy: the role of primary versus secondary tracheoesophageal puncture. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 98 (1989) 70-73
5. Kao W.W., Mohr R.M., Kimmel C.A., et al. The outcome and techniques of primary and secondary tracheoesophageal puncture. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 120 (1994) 301-307
6. Fung K., Teknos T.N., Vandenberg C.D., et al. Prevention of wound complications following salvage laryngectomy using free vascularized tissue. Head Neck 29 (2007) 425-430
7. Weber R.S., Burkey B.A., Forastiere A., et al. Outcome of salvage total laryngectomy following organ preservation therapy-the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial 91-11. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129 (2003) 44-49
8. Sassler A.M., Esclamado R.M., and Wolf G.T. Surgery after organ preservation therapy-analysis of wound complications. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 121 (1995) 162-165
9. Izdebdski K., Reed C.G., Ross J.C., et al. Problems with tracheoesophageal fistula voice restoration in totally laryngectomized patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 120 (1994) 840-845
10. Chone C.T., Gripp F.M., Spina A.L., et al. Primary versus secondary tracheoesophageal puncture for speech rehabilitation in total laryngectomy: long-term results with indwelling voice prosthesis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133 (2005) 89-93
11. Shultz J.R., and Harrison J. Defining and predicting tracheoesophageal puncture success. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 118 (1992) 811-816