Ignoring puff counts: Another shortcoming of the federal trade commission cigarette testing programme

Tobacco Control

Volumn 17, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2008, Pages

  Kozlowski, Lynn T ^a   Whetzel, C A ^b   Stellman, S D ^c   O'Connor, R J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^d ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NICOTINE; TAR; TOBACCO TAR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; EXPOSURE; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; SAFETY; SMOKE; SMOKING; STANDARD; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; UNITED STATES;

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY; HUMANS; INHALATION EXPOSURE; MATERIALS TESTING; NICOTINE; SMOKE; SMOKING; TARS; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION;

EID: 60549109523     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: 14683318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tc.2007.020602     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Kluger R. Ashes to ashes: America's hundred-year cigarette war, the public health, and the unabashed triumph of Philip Morris. New York: Alfred A Knopf, 1996.
2. Peeler CL. Cigarette testing and the Federal Trade Commission: a historical overview. In: The FTC cigarette test method for determining tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide yields of US cigarettes. Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph 7. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 1996.
3. Ogg CL. Determination of particulate matter and alkaloids (as nicotine) in cigarette smoker. J Assoc Ag Chem 1964;47:356-62.
4. Bradford JA, Harlan WR, Hanmer HR. Nature of cigarette smoke: technique of experimental smoking. Ind Eng Chem 1936;28:836-9.
5. Bock FG and commission. FTC hearing transcript. 30 November 1966. Brown and Williamson http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/pyb24f00.
6. Spears AW. [Summary Statement] 30 November 1966. Lorillard.http://legacy. library.ucsf.edu/tid/uwp10e00.
7. Clements EC. [Letter] 4 August 1967. Philip Morris. http://legacy. library.ucsf.edu/tid/ndi74e00.
8. Kozlowski LT, Rickert WS, Robinson JC, et al. Have tar and nicotine yields of cigarettes changed? Science 1980;209:1550-1. (Pubitemid 11235157)
9. Kozlowski LT. Tar and nicotine delivery of cigarettes: what a difference a puff makes. JAMA 1981;245:158-9. (Pubitemid 11212852)
10. Federal Trade Commission. Report on "tar", nicotine, and carbon monoxide 1998. Washington DC: Federal Trade Commission, 2000 http://www.ftc.gov/reports/tobacco/1998tar&nicotinereport.pdf.
11. Daigle WP. [Memo] 1 February 1999. Lorillard. http://legacy.library.ucsf. edu/tid/tqe72d00.
12. Thompson WC. Tare and puff count-TITL market sample No 25. 7 Apr 1982 Lorillard. http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/uiu31e00 Bates No 80005434.
13. Jones RM. Comparison of smoking results form TITL & PM. 26 June 1990. Philip Morris. http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/xft17e00.
14. Steele WL. [Letter and data] 3 March 1994. Brown and Williamson. http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/hgj93f00.
15. Perfetti PF, et al. A literature review of factors that influence cigarette puff count. 10 May 1994. RJ Reynolds. http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/ tid/yiw53d00.
16. Phillip Morris. Cigarettes a la carte. Phillip Morris, 1988. http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/mti98e00.
17. TITL MS #39 1996 YE sales. ND. 1996. Philip Morris.http://legacy.library. ucsf.edu/tid/ais66c00.
18. Burns DM, Major JM, Shanks TG, et al. Smoking lower yield cigarettes and disease risks. In: Risks associated with smoking cigarettes with low machine-measured yields of tar and nicotine. Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph 13. Bethesda MD: National Cancer Institute, 2001.
19. Kozlowski LT, O'Connor RJ. Official cigarette tar test are misleading: use a twostage, compensating test. Lancet 2000;355:2159-61. (Pubitemid 30364671)
20. Kozlowski LT, O'Connor R, Giovino G, et al. Maximum yields might improve public health - if filter vents were banned: a lesson from the history of vented filters. Tob Control 2006;15:262-6. (Pubitemid 43864883)
21. Abdallah F. Cigarette product development. Raleigh, NC: Tobacco Reporter, SpecComm International, Inc, 2004.
22. Ikeda RM, Sanderson KL, Wickham JE. Evaluation report CI Report number 9-68. 30 Sept 1968. Philip Morris. http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/fgs76e00.
23. Giles JA. Reporting of analytical data on competitive brands. 14 Sept 1967. RJ Reynolds. http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/rzt43d00.
24. Merritt HB. Upper leaves vs lower leaves. 9 Oct 1967. Philip Morris. http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/luq84e00.
25. PM USA. Product development. Presentation. 2 July 1994. Philip Morris. http:// legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/pqd36e00.
26. Wald RL. [Letter]. 1 Sept 1966. Lorillard.http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/ tid/cbl90e00.
27. Thompson WC. Tar and puff count - TITL market sample No 25. 7 April 1982. Lorillard. http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/uiu31e00.
28. Iauco DN. Puff count increase program. 5 Sept 1989. RJ Reynolds. http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/nmb34d00.
29. Philip Morris. The control of cigarette smoke deliveries - an overview. April 1986. Philip Morris. http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/kjf29e00.
30. Giovino GA, Biener L, Stellman SD, et al. Summary of workgroup recommendations: National Tobacco Monitoring Research, and Evaluation Workshop. 4-6 November 2002, Bethesda, Maryland USA. Available from http://roswell. tobaccodocuments.org/Work%20Group%20Rec.doc/
31. World Health Organization. The first meeting of the WHO Tobacco Laboratory Network (TobLabNet) on 28 and 29 April 2005 in The Hague, Netherlands. 2005; Available from: http://www.who.int/tobacco/global- interaction/tobreg/laboratory/en/. Accessed 4 May 2007.