"Parallel assessment" of competence to stand trial

American Journal of Forensic Psychology

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 5-22

  Stredny, Rebecca V ^a,b,c   Torres, Angela N ^a,b   Wolber, Greg J ^a,b,d  

^a Central State Hospital ^*  (United States)

^b Central State Hospital Virginia   (United States)

^c VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 60549107505     PISSN: 07331290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Jackson RL, Rogers R, Sewell KW: Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (MFAST): forensic applications as a screen for feigned incompetence to stand trial. Law and Human Behavior 2005; 29:199-210
2. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: Text Revision (4th ed.). Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association Press, 2000
3. Dusky v. U.S., 362 U.S. 402 (1960)
4. Pate v. Robinson, 383 U.S. 375 (1966)
5. Medina v. California, 505 U.S. 437 (1992)
6. Jackson v. Indiana, 406 U.S.715 (1972)
7. Cooper v. Oklahoma, 517 U.S. 348 (1996)
8. Grisso T: Evaluating Competencies: Forensic Assessments and Instruments (2nd ed.). New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2003
9. Bonnie RJ: The competence of criminal defendants: a theoretical reformulation. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 1992; 10:3:291-316
10. Denney RL: Symptom validity testing of remote memory in a criminal forensic setting. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 1996; 11:589-603
11. Rogers R, Bagby RM, Dickens SE: Structured Inventory of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) professional manual. Odessa, FL, Psychological Assessment Resources, 1992
12. Miller HA: M-FAST: Miller-Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test professional manual. Odessa, FL, Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc., 2001
13. Rey A: L'examen Clinique en Psychologie [The Psychological Examination]. Paris, Presses, Universitaires de France, 1958/1964
14. Frederick R.I: A review of Rey's strategies for detecting malingered neuropsychological impairment. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology 2002; 2:1-25
15. Slick DJ, Tan JE, Strauss E, Hultsch DF: Detecting malingering: a survey of experts' practices. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2004; 26:539-549
16. Tombaugh TN: Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM). Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Multi Health Systems, 1996
17. Rogers R, Bender SD: Evaluation of malingering and deception, in Handbook of Psychology: Forensic Psychology (Vol. II). Edited by Goldstein A. New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2003; 109-129
18. Vitacco MJ, Rogers R, Gabel J, Munizza J: An evaluation of malingering screens with competency to stand trial patients: a known-groups comparison. Law and Human Behavior 2007; 31:249-260