Decision support tools for green building: Facilitating selection among new adopters on public sector projects

Journal of Green Building

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 153-171

  Keysar, Elizabeth ^a   Pearce, Annie R ^b  

^a Concurrent Technologies Corporation ^*  (United States)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 60549106465     PISSN: 15526100     EISSN: 19434618     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3992/jgb.2.3.153     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Abrahamson, E. (1991). "Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and rejection of innovations," Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 586-612.
2. ACSIM (Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation Management). (2006). Real Property Summary and Site Statistics for Fiscal Year 2006 Quarter 2. Department of the Army, Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation Management, Washington, DC. Available online at: http://www.hqda.army.mil/acsimweb/doc/06q2_ greenbk_final_06-apr17.pdf.
3. Carmody, J., Guzowski, M. & Wise, J. (2000). "The Minnesota Sustainable Design Guide: A web-based design decision support system," Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Building 2000, Maastricht, NL. 418-420.
4. CMHC (Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation). (2004). Types of Tools, Annex 31 Energy-Related Environmental Impact of Building, Energy Conservation in Buildings and Community Systems, Birmingham, UK. Available online at: http:// www.annex31.org.
5. Denis, J., Hebert, Y., Langley, A., Lozeau, D., & Trottier, L. (2002). "Explaining diffusion patterns for complex health care innovations," Health Care Management Review, 27(3), 60-73.
6. Flanders, S.N., Schneider, R.L., Fournier, D., Deal, B. & Stumpf, A.L. (2001). Planning, Engineering, and Design of Sustainable Facilities and Infrastructure: An Assessment of the State of Practice, ERDC TR-01-03. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center, Champaign, IL.
7. Global Green USA. (2002). San Francisco's Tools of the Trade: Practical Tools for Green Building Design and Analysis. Department of the Environment, City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
8. Horrigan, J.B. (2006). The Internet as a Resource for News and Information about Science. Pew Internet & American Life Project, Pew Charitable Trust Foundation, Washington DC. Available online at http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/191/ report_display.asp.
9. Kapelan, Z., Savic, D.A., & Walters, G.A. (2005) Decision-support tools for sustainable urban development, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Engineering Sustainability 158(ES3): 135-142
10. ™): Cost-Benefit Tool to Promote High Performance Components, Flexible Infrastructures and Systems Integration for Sustainable Commercial Buildings and Productive Organizations. Carnegie Mellon University Center for Building Performance and Diagnostics, Pittsburgh, PA. Portions of this report are available online at http://www.aia.org/SiteObjects/ files/BIDS_color.pdf.
11. Mackley, C., MacLennan, P., Miller, A., and Curwell, S. (2000). "Environmental education for the building industry: An internet resource," Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Building 2000, Maastricht, NL, 174-176.
12. nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
13. Moore, G.A. (1991). Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling High Tech Products to Mainstream Customers. Harper Collins, New York, NY.
14. NRC (National Research Council). (2000). Outsourcing Management Functions for the Acquisition of Federal Facilities. Committee on Outsourcing Design and Construction-Related Management Services for Federal Facilities, Board on Infrastructure and the Constructed Environment, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
15. OFEE (Office of the Federal Environmental Executive). (2003). The Federal Commitment to Green Building: Experiences and Expectations, Office of the Federal Environmental Executive, Washington, DC. Available online at: http://ofee.gov/sb/fgb.html.
16. Panzano, P.C., Roth, D., Crane-Ross, D., Massatti, R., and Carstens, C. (2004). "The innovation diffusion and adoption research project (IDARP): Moving from the diffusion of research results to promoting the adoption of evidence-based innovations in the Ohio Mental Health System," New Research in Mental Health, Vol. 15., Roth, D., ed. Ohio Department of Mental Health, Columbus, OH, 149-156.
17. Pearce, A.R., and Fischer, C.L.J. (2001a). Systems-Based Sustain-ability Analysis of Building 170, Ft. McPherson, Atlanta, GA. Summary analysis report to the Army Environmental Policy Institute, Atlanta, GA, May.
18. Pearce, A.R., and Fischer, C.L.J. (2001b). Resource Guide for Systems-Based Sustainability Analysis of Building 170, Ft. McPherson, Atlanta, GA. Report to the Army Environmental Policy Institute, Atlanta, GA, May.
19. Pearce, A.R. (2001). "Sustainable vs. Traditional Facility Projects: A Holistic Cost Management Approach to Decision Making," White paper prepared for U.S. Army Forces Command, Fort McPherson, GA.
20. Pearce, A.R. (2003). An Online Knowledge Base for Sustainable Military Facilities & Infrastructure. Final Project Report to Region IV Department of Defense Pollution Prevention Partnership, University of South Carolina.
21. Pearce, A.R., DuBose, J.R., Bosch, S.J., and Carpenter, A.M. (2005). Greening Georgia Facilities: An Analysis of LEED Requirement Impacts. Final Project Report to the Georgia Environmental Facilities Authority, Atlanta, GA, September 30.
22. RMI (Rocky Mountain Institute). (2004). Green Building Sources. Rocky Mountain Institute, Snowmass, CO. Available online at: http://www.rmi.org/sitepages/pid174.php#GrnBldgSources.
23. th ed. Free Press, New York, NY.
24. Trusty, W.B. (2003). "Understanding the green building toolkit: Picking the right tool for the job," Proceedings of the USGBC Greenbuild Conference & Expo, Pittsburgh, PA. Available online at: http://www.athenasmi.ca/publications/publications.html.
25. USACE (United States Army Corps of Engineers). (2002). Sustainable Project Rating Tool References and Resource. USACE, Engineering Research and Development Center (ERDC), Champaign, IL. Available online at: http://www.cecer.army.mil/SustDesign/SpiritReferencesV1_4.xls.
26. US DOE FEMP (United States Department of Energy Federal Energy Management Program). (2004). Procurement of Architectural and Engineering Services for Sustainable Buildings: A Guide for Federal Project Managers, DOE/GO-102004-1770. United States Department of Energy, Washington, DC. Available online at: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/femp/pdfs/034413_resguidefedconsmgr.pdf.
27. USGBC (United States Green Building Council). (2005). LEED-NC for New Construction, Reference Guide Version 2.2, United States Green Building Council, Washington, DC.
28. USGBC (United States Green Building Council). (2006). Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Green Building Rating System-New Construction, Version 2.2. U.S. Green Building Council, Washington, DC.
29. th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence. 55-62.
30. Vanegas, J.A. and Pearce, A.R. (2000). "Drivers for Change: An Organizational Perspective on Sustainable Construction." Proceedings, Construction Congress VI, February 20-22, Orlando, FL, 406-415.