Response

Radiology

Volumn 248, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 703-

  Pisano, Etta D ^a   Acharyya, Suddhasatta ^b   Hendrick, R Edward ^c   Yaffe, Martin J ^d   Conant, Emily F ^e   Fajardo, Laurie L ^f   Bassett, Lawrence W ^g   Baum, Janet K ^h   Gatsonis, Constantine A ^b  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h Cambridge City Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LETTER; MAMMOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCREEN FILM MAMMOGRAPHY;

EID: 60549099192     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2482080378     Document Type: Letter

References (1)

1. Pisano ED, Hendrick E, Yaffe MJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. Radiology 2008;246:376-383.