Comparison of gradient encoding directions for higher order tensor diffusion data

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 335-343

  Mang, Sarah C ^a,b   Gembris, Daniel ^b,c   Grodd, Wolfgang ^a   Klose, Uwe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

^c BRUKER BIOSPIN GMBH   (Germany)

Author keywords

DTI; Gradient encoding schemes; HARDI; Higher order tensors

Indexed keywords

DIFFUSION; ENCODING (SYMBOLS); NUMBER THEORY; QUALITY CONTROL; SIGNAL ENCODING;

CONDITION NUMBERS; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGES; ENCODING SCHEMES; ESTIMATION MATRIX; HARDI; HIGHER-ORDER TENSOR; NON-GAUSSIAN DIFFUSIONS; QUALITY MEASURES;

TENSORS;

ARTICLE; DIFFUSION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; NOISE; QUALITY CONTROL; ROTATION; SIMULATION;

EID: 60549099019     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21797     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Frank LR. Characterization of anisotropy in high angular resolution diffusion-weighted MRI. Magn Reson Med 2002;47:1083-1099.
2. Alexander AL, Hasan KM, Lazar M, Tsuruda JS, Parker DL. Analysis of partial volume effects in difffusion-tensor MRI. Magn Reson Med 2001;45:770-780.
3. Alexander DC, Barker GJ, Arridge SR. Detection and modeling of non-gaussian apparent diffusion coefficient profiles in human brain data. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:331-340.
4. Assaf Y, Freidlin RZ, Rohde GK, Basser PJ. New modeling and experimental framework to characterize hindered and restricted water diffusion in brain white matter. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:965-978.
5. Hirsch JG, Schwenk SM, Rossmanith C, Hennerici MG, Gass A. Deviation from the diffusion tensor model as revealed by contour plot visualization using high angular resolution diffusion weighted imaging (HARDI). Magn Reson Mater Phys Biol Med (MAGMA) 2003;16: 93-102.
6. 6.Tuch DS. Q-Ball imaging. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:1358-1372.
7. Kreher BW, Schneider JF, Mader I, Martin E, Hennig J, Il'yasov KA. Multitensor approach for analysis and tracking of complex fiber configurations. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:1216-1225.
8. Liu C, Bammer R, Acar B, Moseley ME. Characterizing non-Gaussian diffusion by using generalized diffusion tensors. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:924-937.
9. Oezarslan E, Mareci TH. Generalized diffusion tensor imaging and analytical relationships between diffusion tensor imaging and high angular resolution diffusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:955-965.
10. Batchelor PG, Atkinson D, Hill DLG, Calamante F, Connelly A. Anisotropic noise propagation in diffusion tensor MRI sampling schemes. Magn Reson Med 2003;49:1143-1151.
11. Hasan KM, Parker DL, Alexander AL. Comparison of gradient encoding schemes for diffusion-tensor MRI. J Magn Reson Imag JMRI 2001;13:769-780.
12. Papadakis NG, Xing D, Huang CLH, Hall LD, Carpenter TA. A comparative study of acquisition schemes for diffusion tensor imaging using MRI. J Magn Reson 1999;137:67-82.
13. Poonawalla AH, Zhou XJ. Analytical error propagation in diffusion anisotropy calculations. J Magn Reson Imag: JMRI 2004;19:489-498.
14. Basser PJ, Pierpaoli C. A simplified method to measure the diffusion tensor from seven MR. images. Magn Reson Med 1998;39:928-934.
15. Mattiello J., Basser PJ, Bihan DL. The b matrix in diffusion tensor echo-planar imaging. Magn Reson Med 1997;37:292-300.
16. Skare S, Hehehus M, Moseley ME, Li TQ. Condition number as a measure of noise performance of diffusion tensor data acquisition schemes with MRI. J Magn Reson 2000;147:340-352.
17. Trefethen LN, David Bau I. Numerical linear algebra. SIAM Philadelphia, 1997.
18. Mang SC, Gembris D, Maenner R. Evaluation ofthe higher order tensor estimation quality for established gradient encoding schemes. In 15th anual Meeting ofthe ISMRM in Berlin. 2007. p. 3165.
19. Kingsley PB. Introduction to diffusion tensor imaging mathematics. II. Tensor calculations, noise, simulations and optimization. Concepts Magn Reson A 2006;28:123-154.
20. Wong ST, Roos MS. A strategy for sampling on a sphere applied to 3d selective rf pulse design. Magn Reson Med 1994;32:778-784.
21. Saff EB, Kuijlaars ABJ. Distributing many points on a sphere. Math Intelligencer 1997;19:5-11.
22. Jones DK, Horsfield MA, Simmons A. Optimal strategies for measureing diffusion in anisotropic systems by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:515-525.
23. Fliege J, Maier U. The distribution of points on the sphere and corresponding cubature formulae. IMA J Num Anal 1999;19:317-334.
24. Kroenke CD, Bretthorst GL, Inder TE, Neil JJ. Modeling water diffusion anisotropy within fixed newborn primate brain using Bayesian probability theory. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:187-197.
25. Jones DK. When is a DT-MRI sampling scheme truly isotropic? In 11th Annual Meeting of the ISMRM in Toronto. 2003. p. 2118.
26. Papadakis NG, XingD, HuangCL, HallLD, CarpenterTA. Acomparative study of acquisition schemes for diffusion tensor imaging using MRI. J Magn Reson 1999;137:67-82.
27. Jones DK. The effect ofgradient samplingschemes onmeasures derived from diffusion tensor MRI: A Monte Carlo study. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:807-815.
28. Cui J, Freeden W. Equidistribution on the sphere. SIAM J Sci: Comput 1997;18:595-609.
29. Liu C, Bammer R, Moseley ME. Limitations of apparent diffusion coefficient-based models in characterizing non-Gaussian diffusion. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:419-428.
30. Descoteaux M, Angelino E, Fitzgibbons S, Deriche R. Apparent diffusion coefficients from high angular resolution diffusion imaging: estimation and applications. Magn Reson Med 2006;56:395-410.
31. Cook PA, Symms M, Boulby PA, Alexander DC. Optimal sition orders of diffusion-weighted mri measurements. J Magn Reson Imag 2007;25:1051-1058.
32. Dubois J, Poupon C, Lethimonnier F, LeBihan D. Optimized diffusion gradient orientation schemes for corrupted clinical dti data sets. Magn Reson Mater Phys 2006;19:134-143.