Greater peripheral blood flow but less bleeding with propofol versus sevoflurane during spine surgery: A possible physiologic model?

Spine

Volumn 33, Issue 18, 2008, Pages 2017-2022

  Albertin, Andrea ^a   La Colla, Luca ^b,c   Gandolfi, Azzurra ^b   Colnaghi, Eleonora ^b   Mandelli, Davide ^b   Gioia, Giuseppe ^b   Fraschini, Gianfranco ^b  

^a IRCCS MULTIMEDICA   (Italy)

^b VITA SALUTE SAN RAFFAELE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^c SAN RAFFAELE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bleeding; Hypotensive anesthesia; Paraspinal muscle blood flow; Propofol; Sevoflurane; Spine surgery

Indexed keywords

CISATRACURIUM; FENTANYL; PROPOFOL; SEVOFLURANE; THIOPENTAL; ETHER DERIVATIVE;

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD FLOW; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LASER DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; OPERATION DURATION; PERIPHERAL CIRCULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SPINE SURGERY; VASODILATATION; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; BACK; COMPARATIVE STUDY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROSURGERY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT MONITORING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; VASCULARIZATION;

ADULT; AGED; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUMBOSACRAL REGION; MALE; METHYL ETHERS; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES; PROPOFOL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD;

EID: 60549090870     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817e0405     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Stern MD. In vivo evaluation of microcirculation by coherent light scattering. Nature 1975;254:56-8.
2. Szpalski M, Gunzburg R, Sztern B. An overview of blood-sparing techniques used in spine surgery during the perioperative period. Eur Spine J 13 Suppl 2004;1:S18-S27.
3. Dutton RP. Controlled hypotension for spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 13 Suppl 2004;1:S66-S71.
4. Degoute CS. Controlled hypotension: a guide to drug choice. Drugs 2007;67:1053-76.
5. Lam AM, Gelb AW. Cardiovascular effects of isoflurane-induced hypotension for cerebral aneurysm surgery. Anesth Analg 1983;62:742-8.
6. Lee TC, Buerkle H, Wang CJ, et al. Effect of isoflurane versus nicardipine on blood flow of lumbar paraspinal muscles during controlled hypotension for spinal surgery. Spine 2001;26:105-9; discussion 109.
7. Brodsky JW, Dickson JH, Erwin WD, et al. Hypotensive anesthesia for scoliosis surgery in Jehovah's Witnesses. Spine 1991;16:304-6.
8. Holzmann A, Schmidt H, Gebhardt MM, et al. Propofol-induced alterations in the microcirculation of hamster striated muscle. Br J Anaesth 1995;75:452-6.
9. Lammers M, Gressner AM. Immunonephelometric quantification of free haemoglobin. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1987;25:363-7.
10. Yoshimoto H, Nagashima K, Sato S, et al. A prospective evaluation of anesthesia for posterior lumbar spine fusion: the effectiveness of preoperative epidural anesthesia with morphine. Spine 2005;30:863-9.
11. Modig J. Regional anaesthesia and blood loss. Acta Anaestbesiol Scand Suppl 1988;89:44-8.
12. Kakiuchi M. Intraoperative blood loss during cervical laminoplasty correlates with the vertebral intraosseous pressure. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002;84:518-20.
13. Negoro T, Mizumoto K, Ogawa K, et al. Effects of isoflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia on arteriovenous shunt flow in the lower limb of diabetic patients without autonomic neuropathy. Anesthesiology 2007;107:45-52.
14. Bruegger D, Bauer A, Finsterer U, et al. Microvascular changes during anesthesia: sevoflurane compared with propofol. Acta Anaestbesiol Scand 2002;46:481-7.
15. Baraka A, Dabbous A, Siddik S, et al. Action of propofol on resistance and capacitance vessels during cardiopulmonary bypass. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1991;35:545-7.
16. Lepage JY, Pinaud ML, Helias JH, et al. Left ventricular performance during propofol or methohexital anesthesia: isotopic and invasive cardiac monitoring. Anesth Analg 1991;73:3-9.
17. Yamazaki M, Nagakawa T, Hatakeyama N, et al. The effects of propofol on neural and endothelial control of in situ rat mesenteric vascular smooth muscle transmembrane potentials. Anesth Analg 2002;94:892-7.
18. Nagakawa T, Yamazaki M, Hatakeyama N, et al. The mechanisms of propofol-mediated hyperpolarization of in situ rat mesenteric vascular smooth muscle. Anesth Analg 2003;97:1639-45.
19. Akata T, Kodama K, Takahashi S. Volatile anaesthetic actions on norepinephrine-induced contraction of small splanchnic resistance arteries. Can J Anaesth 1995;42:1040-50.
20. Akata T, Izumi K, Nakashima M. The action of sevoflurane on vascular smooth muscle of isolated mesenteric resistance arteries (part 2): mechanisms of endothelium-independent vasorelaxation. Anesthesiology 2000;92:1441-53.
21. Lustik SJ, Papadakos PJ, Jackman KV, et al. Nicardipine versus nitroprusside for deliberate hypotension during idiopathic scoliosis repair. J Clin Anesth 2004;16:25-33.
22. Albertin A, Casati A, Bergonzi P, et al. Effects of two target-controlled concentrations (1 and 3 ng/ml) of remifentanil on MAC(BAR) of sevoflurane. Anesthesiology 2004;100:255-9.
23. Kozek-Langenecker SA. The effects of drugs used in anaesthesia on platelet membrane receptors and on platelet function. Curr Drug Targets 2002;3:247-58.
24. Dogan IV, Ovali E, Eti Z, et al. The in vitro effects of isoflurane, sevoflurane, and propofol on platelet aggregation. Anesth Analg 1999;88:432-6.
25. Aoki H, Mizobe T, Nozuchi S, et al. In vivo and in vitro studies of the inhibitory effect of propofol on human platelet aggregation. Anesthesiology 1998;88:362-70.