Economical comparison of CHP systems for industrial user with large steam demand

Applied Energy

Volumn 86, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 904-914

  Giaccone, L ^a   Canova, A ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

Author keywords

CHP; Cogeneration; Economical analysis; ICE; Steam; Turbogas

Indexed keywords

COGENERATION PLANTS; ICE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STEAM;

CHP TECHNOLOGY; CHP-SYSTEMS; COGENERATION; ECONOMICAL ANALYSIS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; INDUSTRIAL USERS; LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORKS; TURBOGAS;

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS;

COMBINED HEAT AND POWER; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; INVESTMENT; POWER GENERATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

CHANDIPURA VIRUS;

EID: 60549086400     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.10.025     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. CONCERTO web site. (23.04.08).
2. POLYCITY official website. (23.04.08).
3. Maidment G.G., Zhao X., and Riffat S.B. Combined cooling and heating using a gas engine in a supermarket. Appl Energy 68 (2001) 321-335
4. Kosugi T., Tokimatsu K., and Zhou W. An economic analysis of a clean-development mechanism project: a case introducing a natural gas-fired combined heat-and-power facility in a Chinese industrial area. Appl Energy 80 (2005) 197-212
5. Khan K.H., Rasul M.G., and Khan M.M.K. Energy conservation in buildings: cogeneration and cogeneration coupled with thermal-energy storage. Appl Energy 77 (2004) 15-34
6. Cardona E., and Piacentino A. Optimal design of chcp plants in the civil sector by thermoeconomics. Appl Energy 84 (2007) 729-748
7. Arcuri P., Florio G., and Fragiacomo P. A mixed integer programming model for optimal design of trigeneration in a hospital complex. Energy 32 (2007) 1430-1447
8. Medrano M., Brouwer J., McDonnel V., Mauzey J., and Samuelsen S. Integration of distributed generation systems into generic types of commercial buildings in California. Energy Build 40 (2008) 537-548
9. Farghal S, El-Dewieny R, Riad A. Economic justification of cogeneration systems for industrial steam users and utility systems. In: IEE proceedings C - generation, transmission and distribution, vol. 136; 1989. p. 100-7.
10. Karagiannis F. Central cogeneration units in Athens - an economical approach. In: 10th Mediterranean electrotechnical conference, 2000 (MELECON 2000), vol. 3; 2000. p. 1032-5.
11. Shah A, Krishnan N. Life cycle evaluation of combined heat and power alternatives in data centers. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE international symposium on electronics and the environment, 2005; 2005. p. 19-24.
12. Kreider J.F., and Rabi A. Heating and cooling in buildings: design for efficiency (1994), McGraw-Hill
13. Ratajczak T, Li Z. Applications and economic analysis of a high reward, low risk cogeneration system. In: IEEE power engineering society general meeting, 2005, vol. 1; 2005. p. 592-8.
14. Jablko R, Saniter C, Hanitsch R, Holler S. Technical and economical comparison of micro CHP systems. In: international conference on future power systems, 2005; 2005. 6pp.
15. Chicco G., and Mancarella P. From cogeneration to trigeneration: profitable alternatives in a competitive market. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 21 1 (2006) 265-272
16. Canova A, Cavallero C, Freschi F, Giaccone L, Repetto M, Tartaglia M. Comparative economical analysis of a small scale trigenerative plant: a case study, to appear in IAS magazine; 2009.
17. Verga M. Comparison and positioning of the different technologies for distribute generation. In: Proceedings of the international conference micro-polygeneration of energy, November 2005.