Application of the dual-frequency ultrasonometer for osteoporosis detection

Ultrasonics

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 331-337

  Sarvazyan, Armen ^a   Tatarinov, Alexey ^a   Egorov, Vladimir ^a   Airapetian, Souren ^a   Kurtenok, Victor ^a   Gatt Jr , Charles J ^b  

^a ARTANN Laboratories Inc   (United States)

^b RUTGERS ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Axial scanning; Bone quantitative ultrasound; Guided waves; Osteoporosis

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC WAVES; BONE; CLASSIFIERS; GUIDED ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE PROPAGATION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; ULTRASONIC APPLICATIONS; ULTRASONICS;

ACOUSTIC WAVEFORMS; AREA UNDER THE ROC CURVES; AXIAL PROFILES; AXIAL SCANNING; AXIAL TRANSMISSIONS; DEVELOPMENT STAGES; DUAL FREQUENCIES; GUIDED ACOUSTIC WAVES; GUIDED WAVES; LINEAR CLASSIFIERS; LONG BONES; OSTEOPOROSIS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVE ANALYSIS; ROC ANALYSIS; ULTRASONIC SCANNERS; VALIDATION STUDIES; WAVE FORMS;

SCANNING;

AGED; ARTICLE; ECHOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 60549085369     PISSN: 0041624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2008.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Lin J.T., and Lane J.M. Osteoporosis: a review. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 425 (2004) 126-134
2. Nguyen T.V., Center J.R., and Eisman J.A. Osteoporosis: underrated, underdiagnosed and undertreated. Med. J. Aust. 180 5 Suppl. (2004) S18-S22
3. Glüer C.C., and Barkmann R. Quantitative ultrasound: use in the detection of fractures and in the assessment of bone composition. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 1 3 (2003) 98-104
4. Njeh C.F., Fuerst T., Diessel E., and Genant H.K. Is quantitative ultrasound dependent on bone structure? A reflection. Osteoporos. Int. 12 1 (2001) 1-15
5. Laugier P. Instrumentation for in vivo ultrasonic characterization of bone strength. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 55 6 (2008) 1179-1196
6. Gregg E.W., Kriska A.M., and Salamone L.M. The epidemiology of quantitative ultrasound: a review of the relationships with bone mass, osteoporosis and fracture risk. Osteopor. Int. 7 (1997) 89-99
7. Bauer D.C., Gluer C.C., Cauley J.A., Vogt T.M., Ensrud K.E., Genant H.K., and Black D.M. Broadband ultrasound attenuation predicts fractures strongly and independently of densitometry in older women. A prospective study. Study of osteoporotic fractures research group. Arch. Intern. Med. 157 6 (1997) 629-634
8. Hans D., Bo F., and Fuerst T. Non-heel quantitative ultrasound devices. In: NJeh C.F., Hans D., Fuerst T., Gluer C.C., and Genant H.K. (Eds). Quantitative Ultrasound: Assessment of Osteoporosis and Bone Status (1999), Martin Dunitz, London 145-162
9. Camu E., Talmant M., Berger G., and Laugier P. Analysis of the axial transmission technique for the assessment of skeletal status. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108 (2000) 3058-3065
10. Prevrhal S., Fuerst T., Fan B., Njeh C., Hans D., Uffmann M., Srivastav S., and Genant H.K. Quantitative ultrasound of the tibia depends on both cortical density and thickness. Osteoporos. Int. 12 1 (2001) 28-34
11. Hollevoet N., Verdonk R., Goemaere S., and Van Maele G. Tibial ultrasound velocity in women with wrist fracture. J. Clin. Densitom. 7 3 (2004) 302-306
12. Christian R., Krestan C.R., Grampp S., Henk C., Peloschek P., and Imhof H. Limited diagnostic agreement of quantitative sonography of the radius and phalanges with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine, femur, and radius for diagnosis of osteoporosis. AJR 183 (2004) 639-644
13. Tuna H., Birtane M., Ekuklu G., Cermik F., Tuna F., and Kokino S. Does quantitative tibial ultrasound predict low bone mineral density defined by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry?. Yonsei Med. J. 49 (2008) 436-442
14. Nicholson P.H., Moilanen P., Karkkainen T., Timonen J., and Cheng S. Guided ultrasonic waves in long bones: modelling, experiment and in vivo application. Physiol. Meas. 23 4 (2002) 755-776
15. Lefebvre F., Deblock Y., Campistron P., Ahite D., and Fabre J.J. Development of a new ultrasonic technique for bone and biomaterials in vitro characterization. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 63 (2002) 441-446
16. Muller M., Moilanen P., Bossy E., Nicholson P., Kilappa V., Timonen J., Talmant M., Cheng S., and Laugier P. Comparison of three ultrasonic axial transmission methods for bone assessment. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 31 5 (2005) 633-642
17. Tatarinov A., Sarvazyan N., and Sarvazyan A. Use of multiple acoustic wave modes for assessment of long bones: model study. Ultrasonics 43 8 (2005) 672-680
18. Viktorov I.A. Rayleigh and Lamb Waves, Physical Theory and Applications (1967), Plenum Press, New York
19. Moilanen P., Nicholson P.H., Kilappa V., Cheng S., and Timonen J. Assessment of the cortical bone thickness using ultrasonic guided waves: modelling and in vitro study. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 33 2 (2007) 254-262
20. Moilanen P. Ultrasonic guided waves in bone. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 55 (2008) 1277-1286
21. Bossy E., Talmant M., and Laugier P. Three-dimensional simulations of ultrasonic axial transmission velocity measurement on cortical bone models. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115 (2004) 2314-2324
22. Protopappas V.C., Fotiadis D.I., and Malizos K.N. Guided ultrasound wave propagation in intact and healing long bones. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 32 (2006) 693-708
23. Sasso M., Haïat G., Talmant M., Laugier P., and Naili S. Singular value decomposition-based wave extraction in axial transmission: application to cortical bone ultrasonic characterization. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 55 6 (2008) 1328-1332
24. Krieg M.A., Barkmann R., Gonnelli S., Stewart A., Bauer D.C., Del Rio Barquero L., Kaufman J.J., Lorenc R., Miller P.D., Olszynski W.P., Poiana C., Schott A.M., Lewiecki E.M., and Hans D. Quantitative ultrasound in the management of osteoporosis: the ISCD official positions. J. Clin. Densitom. 11 2008 (2007) 163-187
25. A. Sarvazyan, A. Tatarinov, Method and device for multiparametric ultrasonic assessment of bone conditions, US Patent 6,468,215 B1, 2001.
26. Tatarinov A., and Sarvazyan A. Topography of acoustical properties of long bones: from biomechanical studies to bone health assessment. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 55 6 (2008) 1287-1297
27. A. Tatarinov, A. Sarvazyan, Dual-frequency method for ultrasonic assessment of bones: model study, in: Proceedings of the World Congress on Ultrasonics, September, CDROM, 2003, pp. 895-898.
28. Patrick E.A. Fundamentals of Pattern Recognition (1972), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
29. McGill R., Tukey J.W., and Larsen W.A. Variations of box plots. American Statistician 32 (1978) 12-16
30. Zweig M.H., and Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin. Chem. 39 (1993) 561-577
31. Streiner D.L., and Cairney J. What's under the ROC? An introduction to receiver operating characteristics curves. Can. J. Psychiatry 52 2 (2007) 121-128
32. S.A. Macskassy, F. Rosset, ROC confedence bands: an empirical evaluation, in: Proceedings of 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning, Bonn, Germany, 2005, pp. 537-554.
33. Cook R.B., Collins D., Tucker J., and Zioupos P. The ability of peripheral quantitative ultrasound to identify patients with low bone mineral density in the hip or spine. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 31 5 (2005) 625-632