Stereo imaging and cytocompatibility of a model dental implant surface formed by direct laser fabrication

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 88, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 823-831

  Mangano, Carlo ^a   Raspanti, Mario ^a   Traini, Tonino ^b   Piattelli, Adriano ^b   Sammons, Rachel ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INSUBRIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cyto compatibility; Dental implant; Direct laser fabrication; Stereoimaging; Surface analysis

Indexed keywords

3-D RECONSTRUCTION; CELL DENSITIES; COMPLEX GEOMETRIES; CYTO-COMPATIBILITY; DENTAL IMPLANT; DIRECT LASER FABRICATION; ETCHED SURFACES; FIBRIN CLOT EXTENSIONS; FOCUSED LASER BEAMS; METAL POWDERS; MICRO ROUGHNESS; MICRO-TEXTURED SURFACES; ROUGHNESS PARAMETERS; STEREOIMAGING; SURFACE CHARACTERIZATIONS; TI6A14V ALLOYS; VARIABLE SHAPES;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; DENTAL PROSTHESES; FABRICATION; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); INORGANIC ACIDS; INORGANIC COMPOUNDS; LASERS; MACHINE TOOLS; OSTEOBLASTS; POLYMER BLENDS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SINTERING; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TITANIUM; TITANIUM ALLOYS;

SURFACE ANALYSIS;

ALLOY; INORGANIC ACID;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL ADHESION; CELL DENSITY; CELL SPREADING; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; FIBRIN CLOT; LASER; NONHUMAN; OSTEOBLAST; PARTICLE SIZE; RAT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH ROOT;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; LASERS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; RATS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES;

EID: 60549083700     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32033     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Steinemann SG. Titanium-The material of choice? Periodontol 2000 1998; 17:7-21.
2. Turner TM, Sumner DR, Urban RM, Rivero DP, Galante JO. A comparative study of porous coatings in a weight-bearing total hip-arthroplasty model. J Bone Joint Surg Am A 1986; 68:1396-1409.
3. Hollander DA, von Walter M, Wirtz T, Sellei R, Schmidt- Rohlfing B, Paar O, Erli HJ. Structural, mechanical and in vitro characterization of individually structured Ti-6A1-4V produced by direct laser forming. Biomaterials 2006; 27:955-963.
4. Thieme M, Wieters KP, Bergner F, Scharnweber D, Worch H, Ndop J, Kim TJ, Grill W. Titanium powder sintering for preparation of a porous functionally graded material destined for orthopaedic implants. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2001;12:225- 231.
5. Di Iorio D, Traini T, Degidi M, Caputi S, Neugebauer J, Piattelli A. Quantitative evaluation of the fibrin clot extension on different implant surfaces: An in vitro study. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 2005; 74:636-642.
6. Binaghi E, Gallo I, Marino G, Raspanti M. Neural adaptive stereo matching. Patt Recogn Lett 2004; 25:1743-1758.
7. Sammons RL, Lumbikanonda N, Gross M, Cantzler P. Comparison of osteoblast spreading on microstructured dental implant surfaces and cell behaviour in an explant model of osseointegration. Clin Oral Impl Res 2005; 16:657-666.
8. Matsuda T, Davies JE. The in vitro response of osteoblasts to bioactive glass. Biomaterials 1987; 8:275-284.
9. Goodman S, Aspenberg P, Song Y, Regula D, Lidgren L. Polyethylene and titanium alloy particles reduce bone formation-Dose-dependence in bone harvest chamber experiments in rabbits. Acta Orthop Scand 1996; 67:599-605.
10. Torgersen S, Gjerdet NR, Erichsen ES, Bang G. Metal particles and tissue changes adjacent to miniplates-A retrieval study. Acta Odontolog Scand 1995; 53:65-71.
11. Cooper LF. A role for surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84:522-534.
12. Gray C. Advanced bone formation in grooves in vitro is not restricted to calcified biological materials. Tissue Eng 1998; 4:315-323.
13. Gray C, Boyde A, Jones SJ. Topographically induced bone formation in vitro: Implications for bone implants and bone grafts. Bone 1996; 18:115-123.
14. Ripamonti U. Osteoinduction in porous hydroxyapatite implanted in heterotopic sites of different animal models. Biomaterials 1996; 17:31-35.
15. Ripamonti U. Soluble and insoluble signals and the induction of bone formation. J Anat 2006; 209:567-567.
16. Ripamonti U. Soluble, insoluble and geometric signals sculpt the architecture of mineralized tissues. J Cell Mol Med 2004; 8:169-180.
17. Tsuruga E, Takita H, Itoh H, Wakisaka Y, Kuboki Y. Pore size of porous hydroxyapatite as the cell-substratum controls BMP-induced osteogenesis. J Biochem 1997; 121:317-324.
18. Frosch KH, Barvencik F, Viereck V, Lohmann CH, Dresing K, Breme J, Brunner E, Sturmer KM. Growth behavior, matrix production, and gene expression of human osteoblasts in defined cylindrical titanium channels. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004; 68:325-334.
19. Zinger O, Anselme K, Denzer A, Habersetzer P, Wieland M, Jeanfils J, Hardouin P, Landolt D. Time-dependent morphology and adhesion of osteoblastic cells on titanium model surfaces featuring scale-resolved topography. Biomaterials 2004; 25:2695-2711.
20. Itala AI, Ylanen HO, Ekholm C, Karlsson KH, Aro HT. Pore diameter of more than 100 μm is not requisite for bone ingrowth in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 58:679-683.
21. Stein GS, Lian JB, Owen TA. Relationship of cell-growth to the regulation of tissue-specific gene-expression during osteoblast differentiation. FASEB J 1990; 4:3111-3123.
22. Ingber DE, Tensegrity II. How structural networks influence cellular information processing networks. J Cell Sci 2003; 116:1397-1408.
23. Faghihi S, Bateni MR, Azari F, Szpunar JA, Vali H, Tabrizian M. The significance of crystallographic texture of titanium alloy substrates on pre-osteoblast responses. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 3532-3539.
24. Anselme K, Bigerelle M, Noel B, Dufresne E, Judas D, Iost A, Hardouin P. Qualitative and quantitative study of human osteoblast adhesion on materials with various surface roughnesses. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 49:155-166.
25. Boyan BD, Hummert TW, Kieswetter K, Schraub D, Dean DD, Schwartz Z. Effect of titanium surface characteristics on chondrocytes and osteoblasts in vitro. Cells Mater 1995; 5:323- 334.
26. Kieswetter K, Schwartz Z, Dean DD, Boyan BD. The role of implant surface characteristics in the healing of bone. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1996; 7:329-345.
27. Boyan BD, Lohmann CH, Dean DD, Sylvia VL, Cochran DL, Schwartz Z. Mechanisms involved in osteoblast response to implant surface morphology. Ann Rev Mater Res 2001;31: 357-371.
28. Davies JE. Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Pros- thodont 1998; 11:391-401.
29. Schierano G, Canuto RA, Navone R, Peirone B, Martinasso G, Pagano M, Maggiora M, Manzella C, Easton M, Davit A, Trombetta A, Amedeo S, Biolatti B, Carossa S, Preti G. Biological factors involved in the osseointegration of oral titanium implants with different surfaces: A pilot study in mini- pigs. J Periodontal 2005;76:1710-1720.
30. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contribution to failures of osseointegrated oral implants (II). Etiopathogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci 1998; 106:721-764.
31. Schou S, Berglundh T, Lang NP. Surgical treatment of peri- implantitis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19 (Suppl): 140-149.