Atomic three-body loss as a dynamical three-body interaction

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 102, Issue 4, 2009, Pages

  Daley, A J ^a,b   Taylor, J M ^c   Diehl, S ^a,b   Baranov, M ^a,b   Zoller, P ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

^b ERICH SCHMID INSTITUTE OF MATERIALS SCIENCE   (Austria)

^c MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOMS; QUANTUM CHEMISTRY; STATISTICAL MECHANICS;

NON-EQUILIBRIUM DYNAMICS; OPTICAL LATTICES; QUANTUM TRAJECTORIES; THREE-BODY INTERACTIONS; TIME-DEPENDENT DENSITY MATRIXES;

ATOMIC PHYSICS;

EID: 60449110399     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.040402     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885 (2008). RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.885
2. G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 040502 (2004); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.040502
3. F. Verstraete, V. Murg, and J.I. Cirac, Adv. Phys. ADPHAH 0001-8732 57, 143 (2008). 10.1080/14789940801912366
4. A.J. Daley, J. Stat. Mech. 1742-5468 04 (2004) P04005; 10.1088/1742-5468/2004/04/P04005
5. S.R. White and A.E. Feiguin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 076401 (2004); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.076401
6. F. Verstraete, J.J. Garcia-Ripoll, and J.I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 207204 (2004). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.207204
7. N. Syassen, Science 320, 1329 (2008). SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.1155309
8. J.J. Garcia-Ripoll, arXiv:0809.3679v1.
9. B. Paredes, T. Keilmann, and J.I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. A 75, 053611 (2007). PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.053611
10. T.B. Ottenstein, arXiv:0806.0587v2.
11. A. Rapp, G. Zarand, C. Honerkamp, and W. Hofstetter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 160405 (2007). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.160405
12. H.J. Carmichael, An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics (Springer, Berlin, 1993);
13. C.W. Gardiner and P. Zoller, Quantum Noise (Springer, Berlin, 2005).
14. See, e.g., T. Kraemer, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 440, 315 (2006). 10.1038/nature04626
15. Off-site loss terms can arise from nonzero overlap of the corresponding Wannier functions, in analogy to off-site elastic interactions, which are discussed in L.-M. Duan, Europhys. Lett. 81, 20001 (2008). These are small for γ3 values used here. EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/0295-5075/81/20001
16. M. Zwolak and G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 207205 (2004); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.207205
17. F. Verstraete, J.J. Garcia-Ripoll, and J.I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 207204 (2004). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.207204
18. M.W.J. Romans, R.A. Duine, Subir Sachdev, and H.T.C. Stoof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 020405 (2004); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.020405
19. L. Radzihovsky, J.I. Park, and P.B. Weichman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 160402 (2004); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.160402
20. L. Radzihovsky, P.B. Weichman, and J.I. Park, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) ANPYA2 0003-3804 323, 2376 (2008). 10.1016/j.aop.2008.05.008
21. S. Diehl, (to be published).