Validity of a self-administered 3-day physical activity recall in young adults

American Journal of Health Education

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 5-13

  Han, Jennifer L ^a   Dinger, Mary K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 60449102333     PISSN: 19325037     EISSN: 21683751     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19325037.2009.10599073     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Brown WJ, Burton NW, Rowan PJ. Updating the evidence on physical activity and health in women. Am JPrev Med. 2007;33(5):404-411.
2. Goodwin RD. Association between physical activity and mental disorders among adults in the United States. Prev Med. 2003;36:698-703.
3. Macera CA, Hootman JM, Sniezek JE. Major public health benefits of physical activity. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;49(1):122-128.
4. Rockhill B, Willet WC, Manson JE, et al. Physical activity and mortality: A prospective study among women. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(4):578-583.
5. Warburton DER, Nicol CW, Bredin SSD. Health benefits of physical activity: The evidence. CMAJ. 2006;174(6):801-809.
6. Caspersen CJ, Pereira MA, Curran KM. Changes in physical activity patterns in the United States, by sex and cross-sectional age. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9):1601-1609.
7. Han JL, Dinger MK, Hull HR, Randall N, Heesch KC, Fields DA. Changes in women’s physical activity during the transition to college. Am J Health Educ. 2008;39(4):194-197.
8. Kriska AM, Caspersen CJ. Introduction to a collection of physical activity questionnaires. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997;29(6):S5-S9.
9. Sallis JF, Saelens BE. Assessment of physical activity by self-report: Status, limitations, and future directions. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000;71(2):1-14.
10. Ainsworth BE. Practical Assessment of Physical Activity. In: Tritschler K, ed. Barrow and McGee’s Practical Measurement and Assessment. 1st ed. Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2000:475-496.
11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Questionnaire. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2002.
12. Lof M, Forsum E. Validation of energy intake by dietary recall against different methods to assess energy expenditure. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2004;17:471-480.
13. Lof M, Hannestad U, Forsum E. Comparison of commonly used procedures, including the doubly-labeled water technique, in the estimation of total energy expenditure of women with special reference to the significance of body fat. Br J Nutr. 2003;90:961-968.
14. Malinauskas BM, Raedeke TD, Aeby VG, Smith JL, Dallas MB. Dieting practices, weight perceptions, and body composition: A comparison of normal weight, overweight, and obese college females. Nutr J. Vol 6; 2006.
15. Matthews CE, Freedson PS, Hebert JR, Stanek III EJ, Merriam PA, Ockene IS. Comparing physical activity assessment methods in the Seasonal Variation of Blood Cholesterol study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(5):976-984.
16. Sallis JF, Haskell WL, Wood PD, et al. Physical activity assessment methodology in the Five-City Project. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;121(1):91-106.
17. Weston AT, Petosa R, Pate RR. Validation of an instrument for measurement of physical activity in youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997;29(1):138-143.
18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National College Health Risk Behavior Survey - United States, 1995. MMWR. 1997;46(SS-6):21-23.
19. Haskell WL, Lee I, Pate RR, et al. Physical activity and public health. Updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc. Vol 39; 2007:1423-1434.
20. Washburn RA, Jacobsen DJ, Sonko BJ, Hill JO, Donnelly JE. The validity of the Stanford Seven-Day Physical Activity Recall in young adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1374-1380.
21. Pate RR, Ross R, Dowda M, Trost SG, Sirard JR. Validation of a 3-day physical activity recall instrument in female youth. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2003;15:257-265.
22. Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology. PAR-Q and You. Gloucester, Ontario: Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology; 1994:1-2.
23. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
24. Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard JR. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(5):777-781.
25. Hendelman D, Miller K, Baggett C, Debold E, Freedson PS. Validity of accelerom-etry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9):S442-S449.
26. Welk GJ, Schaben JA, Morrow Jr. JR. Reliability of accelerometry-based activity monitors: A generalizability study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(9):1637-1645.
27. ActiGraph L. ActiGraph GT1M Monitor and ActiLife Lifestyle Monitor Software Ver 1.0 User Manual. Pensacola, FL: ActiGraph, LLC; 2006.
28. Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Masse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exercise. 2008;40(1):181-188.
29. Schutz Y, Weinsier RL, Hunter GR. Assessment of free-living physical activity in humans: An overview of currently available and proposed new measures. Obes Res. 2001;9(6):368-379.
30. Dinger MK, Behrens TK, Han JL. Validity and reliability of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire in college students. Am J Health Educ. 2006;37(6):337-343.
31. Hayden-Wade HA, Coleman KJ, Sallis JF, Armstrong C. Validation of the telephone and in-person interview versions of the 7-Day PAR. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(5):801-809.
32. Richardson MT, Ainsworth BE, Jacobs DR, Leon AS. Validation of the Stanford 7-Day Recall to assess habitual physical activity. Ann Epidemiol. 2001;11(2):145-153.
33. McMurray RG, Ring KB, Treuth MS, et al. Comparison of two approaches to structured physical activity surveys for adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(12):2135-2143.
34. Ainsworth BE, Bassett J.D. R., Strath SJ, et al. Comparison of three methods for measuring the time spent in physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9):S457-S464.
35. Swartz AM, Strath SJ, Bassett J. D. R., O’Brien WL, King GA, Ainsworth BE. Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9):S450-S456.
36. Ham SA, Reis JP, Strath SJ, Dubose KD, Ainsworth BE. Discrepancies between methods of identifying objectively determined physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39(1):52-58.
37. Strath SJ, Bassett J. D. R., Swartz AM. Comparison of MTI accelerometer cut-points for predicting time spent in physical activity. Int J Sports Med. 2003;24:298-303.
38. Baranowski T, Smith M, Thompson WO, Baranowski J, Hebert D, de Moor C. Intraindividual variability and reliability in a 7-day exercise record. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;31(11):1619-1622.
39. Buchowski MS, Acra S, Majchrzak KM, Sun M, Chen KY. Patterns of physical activity in free-living adults in the southern United States. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004;58:828-837.
40. Gretebeck RJ, Montoye HJ. Variability of some objective measures of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992;24(10):1167-1172.
41. Trost SG, Pate RR, Freedson PS, Sallis JF, Taylor WC. Using objective physical activity measures with youth: How many days of monitoring are needed? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(2):426-431.
42. Trost SG, McIver KL, Pate RR. Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(11):S531-S543.
43. Matthews CE. Calibration of accelerometer output for adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(11):S512-S522.
44. American College Health Association. American College Health Association National College Health Assessment Spring 2006 Reference Group data report (abridged). J Am Coll Health. 2007;55(4):195-206.