Procedural safeguards for young offenders: Views of legal professionals and adolescents

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 401-417

  Hicks, Anthony J ^a   Lawrence, Jeanette A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 6044267889     PISSN: 00048658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1375/acri.37.3.401     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Australian Government. (1995). Australia's report under the convention on the rights of the child. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service.
2. Australian Law Reform Commission/Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission. (1997). Seen and heard: Priority for children in the legal process. Report no. 84. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service.
3. Cashmore, J. (1997). Making legal processes work for children. Reform, 71, 65-68.
4. Cashmore, J., & Bussey, K. (1994). Perceptions of children and lawyers in care and protection proceedings. International Journal of Law and the Family, 8, 319-336.
5. Casper, J.D., Tyler, T.R., & Fisher, B. (1988). Procedural justice in felony cases. Law and Society Review, 22, 483-507.
6. Cronin, K. (1997). The failings of federalism: Juvenile justice issues in Australia. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 9, 107-112.
7. Davies, E., & Seymour, F.W. (1997). Child witness in the criminal courts: Further New Zealand's commitment to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 4(1), 13-24.
8. Fry, P.S., & Corfield, V.K. (1983). Children's judgments of authority figures with respect to outcome and procedural fairness. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 143, 241-250.
9. Guy, M. (1990). Ethical decision making in everyday work situations. New York: Quorum.
10. Hicks, A.J., & Lawrence, J.A. (1993). Children's criteria for procedual justice: Developing a young people's procedural justice scale. Social Justice Research, 6, 163-182.
11. Landis, J.M. & Goodstein, L. (1987). When is justice fair? An integrated approach to the outcome versus process debate. American Bar Association Journal, 4, 675-707.
12. Law Society of New South Wales Children's Legal Issues Committee. (2000). Law Society report: New representation principles for children's lawyers. The Law Society Journal, 38(11), 50.
13. Lawrence, J.A. (1991). Informal reasoning in the judicial system. In D.N. Perkins, J.F. Voss, & J. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 59-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Lawrence, J.A., Hart, P., & Wearing, A.J. (1994, March). Archival analysis of cautions issued to shopstealers in Victoria, 1988 to 1991. Technical report presented to the Victoria Police Research Coordination Committee, Melbourne, Australia.
15. Levesque, R.J.R. (1996). International children's rights: Can they make a difference in American family policy? American Psychologist, 51, 1251-1256.
16. Lind, E.A., Ambrose, M., deVera Park, M., & Kulik, C.T. (1990). Perspective and procedural justice: Attorney and litigant evaluations of court procedures. Social Justice Research, 4, 325-336.
17. Lind, E.A., Kulik, C.T., Ambrose, M., & de Vera Park, M. (1993). Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 224-251.
18. Lissak, R., & Sheppard, B.H. (1983). Beyond fairness: The criterion problem in research on dispute intervention. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 45-65.
19. Mossholder, K.W., Bennett, N., & Martin, C.L. (1998). A multilevel analysis of procedural justice context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 131-141.
20. Nicholson, A. (1999). The 1999 children's lawyer of the year awards. Family Court of Australia: Papers and reports. Retrieved from www.familycourt.gov.au/papers/html
21. Ruck, M.D., Abramovitch, R., & Keating, D.P. (1998). Children's and adolescents' understanding of rights: Balancing nurturance and self-determination. Child Development, 69, 404-417.
22. Schaubroeck, J., May, D.R., & Brown, F.W. (1994). Procedural justice explanations and employee reactions to economic hardship: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 455-460.
23. Sidoti, C. (1998). Noble rhetoric or concrete action? Children, legal processes and human rights, Reform, 72, 48-51.
24. Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper Collins College.
25. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26. Tyler, T.R., Boeckmann, R.J., Smith, H., & Huo, Y.J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
27. Tyler, T.R., & Lind, E.A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental and social psychology (Vol. 25), pp. 115-119. New York: Academic Press.
28. Tyler, T.R., Rasinski, K.A., & Spodick, N. (1985). Influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 72-81.
29. United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989). (1989, November 20; entered into force, September 2, 1990).
30. Wagenaar, W.A., van Koppen, P.J., & Crombag, H.F.M. (1993). Anchored narratives: The psychology of criminal evidence. New York: St. Martin's Press.