Student perceptions of the peer review process in student writing projects

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 249-263

  Simkin, Mark G ^a   Ramarapu, Nari K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 6044244848     PISSN: 00472816     EISSN: None     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/EQWL-PE4G-D2UD-PV9M     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. M. L. Manning and R. Lucking, The What, Why and How of Cooperative Learning, The Clearing House, 64, pp. 152-156, 1991.
2. J. B. Wolverton, Research, Application and Reflections on Using Student Groups to Enhance Classroom Accounting Instruction, Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Meeting of the Western Decision Sciences Institute, San Diego, pp. 287-290, March 30-April 2, 1993.
3. J. F. Coates, Skills Required for Twenty-First Century Employment, Employment Relations Today, 22:3, pp. 17-24, Autumn 1995.
4. G. A. Marcoulides and M. G. Simkin, Evaluating Student Papers: the Case for Peer Review, Journal of Education for Business, pp. 80-83, November/December 1991.
5. W. J. Miller, J. D. Jordan, and W. M. Lankford, Total Quality Management in Higher Education: A Review and Literature, Proceedings of the Decision Sciences Institute Southwest Region Annual Meeting, pp. 65-68, 1993.
6. M. Barrier, Business Schools, TQM, and You, Nation's Business, pp. 60-61, July 1993.
7. K. Singal and R. Hayes, An Open Response to 'TQM on Campus':We Need TQM . . . and More, Production and Operations Management, pp. 124-125, Winter 1992.
8. R. G. Lewis and D. H. Smith, Total Quality in Higher Education, St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, Florida, 1994.
9. G. E. Grodon, J. Ponticell, and R. R. Morgan, Back to Basics, Training and Development Journal, 48:8, pp. 73-76, 1989.
10. A. H. Packer, Earning and Learning Major Links to Better Living, HRMagazine, 38:4, pp. 51-54, 1993.
11. W. F. McCanna and R. F. Pearse, Reengineering Managerial and Professional Education System: Corporate Investment in Management Education, Compensation and Benefits Management, 12:3, pp. 21-27, 1996.
12. M. H. Maier and D. Keenan, Teaching Tools: Cooperative Learning in Economics, Economic Inquiry, 32:2, pp. 358-361, 1994.
13. E. W. Deming, Quality, Productivity, and Competitive Position, MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1982.
14. S. I. Greenbaum, TQM at Kellogg, Journal of Quality & Participation, 16:1, pp. 88-92, January/February 1993.
15. R. J. Allcorn, Using Quality Ideas in a High School Journalism Class, Teaching and Change, 2:3, pp. 263-274, 1995.
16. D. H. Lynch and S. Gordon, Peer Evaluation of Writing in Business Communication Classes, Journal of Education in Business, pp. 44-48, September/October 1992.
17. V. E. Johnson, On Bayesian Analysis of Multivariate Ordinal Data: An Application to Automated Essay Grading, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91:433, pp. 42-51, March 1996.
18. E. B. Page, Computer Grading of Student Prose Using Modem Concepts and Software, Journal of Experimental Education, 62:2, pp. 127-142, Winter 1994.
19. G. Marcoulides and M. G. Simkin, The Consistency of Peer Review in Student Writing Projects, Journal of Education for Business, pp. 220-223, March/April 1995.
20. J. Harrod, Collaborative Learning in the Literature Classroom, Conference on College Composition and Communication, 42nd, Boston, Massachusetts, March 21, 1991.