Evaluation of patellar chondromalacia with MR: Comparison between T2-weighted FSE SPIR and GE MTC;Valutazione della condropatia rotulea con RM: Confronto tra sequenze FSE SPIR T2 e GE MTC

Radiologia Medica

Volumn 108, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 159-171

  Macarini, Luca ^a   Perrone, Alessandra ^b   Murrone, Mario ^b   Marini, Stefania ^b   Stefanelli, Michele ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Chondromalacia; Knee; Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Indexed keywords

HYALIN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; CHONDROPATHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; KNEE ARTHROSCOPY; MAGNETIZATION TRANSFER CONTRAST SEQUENCE; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATELLA CHONDROMALACIA; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SPECTRAL PRESATURATION WITH INVERSION RECOVERY SEQUENCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTHROSCOPY; CHONDROMALACIA PATELLAE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 6044244818     PISSN: 00338362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Peyron JG: Osteoarthritis: the epidemiologic view-point. Clin Orthop 213: 13-19, 1986.
2. Curl WW, Krome J, Gordon ES et al: Cartilage injures: a review of 31,516 knee arthroscopies. Arthroscopy 13: 456-460, 1997.
3. Rangger C, Kathrein A, Klestil T et al: Partial meniscectomy and osteoarthritis. Implications for treatment of athletes. Sports Med 23: 61-68, 1997.
4. Peterfy CG, Linares R, Stienbach LS: Recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Radiol Clin North Am 32: 291-311, 1994.
5. Recht M, Bobic V, Burstein D et al: Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage. Clin Orthop 391 (Suppl.): S379-396, 2001.
6. Konig H, Sauter R, Diemling M et al: Cartilage disorder: comparison of spin-echo, CHESS, and FLASH sequence MR images. Radiology 164: 753-758, 1987.
7. Recht MP, Kramer J, Marcelis S et al: Abnormalities of articular cartilage in the knee: analysis of available MR techniques. Radiology 187: 473-478, 1993.
8. Disler DG, McCauley TR, Kelman CG et al: Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy. AJR 167: 127-132, 1996.
9. Bredella MA, Tirman PFJ, Peterfy CG et al: Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients. AJR 172: 1073-1080, 1999.
10. Mori R, Ochi M, Sakai Y et al: Clinical significance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for focal chondral lesions. Magn Reson Imaging 17: 1135-1140, 1999.
11. Sonin AH, Pensy RA, Mulligan ME et al: Grading articular cartilage of the knee using fast spin-echo proton density-weighted MR imaging without fat suppression. AJR 179: 1159-1166, 2002.
12. Noyes FR, Stabler Craig L: A system for grading articular cartilage lesions at arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 17: 505-513, 1989.
13. Kneeland JB: Articular cartilage and the magic angle effect. AJR 177: 671-672, 2001.
14. Macarini L, Rizzo A, Martino F et al: Stadi iniziali (I e II) e avanzati (III e IV) della condromalacia rotulea giovanile: Diagnosi con Risonanza Magnetica con magnete da 1,5 tesla con sequenze FLASH. Radiol Med 95: 557-562, 1998.
15. Macarini L, Murrone M, Marini S et al: RM nello studio della condropatia del ginocchio: influenza della sede e dello stadio delle lesioni sull'efficacia delle lesioni. Radiol Med 105: 48-55, 2003.
16. Lawrence RC, Hochberg MC, Kelsey JL et al: Estimate of the prevalence of selected arthritic and musculoskeletal disease in the United States. J Rheumatol 16: 427-441, 1989.
17. Buckwalter JA, Mankin HJ: Articular cartilage: Degeneration and osteoarthritis, repair, regeneration, and transplantation. Instr Course Lect 47: 487-504, 1998.
18. Brossman J, Frank LR, Pauly JM et al: Short echo time projection reconstruction MR imaging of cartilage: comparison with fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS and magnetization contrast MR imaging. Radiology 203: 501-507, 1997.
19. Chalkias SM, Frezza F, Cova M et al: Magnetic resonance of the larges joints. Radiol Med 87: 555-573, 1994.
20. Cova M, Toffanin R: MR microscopy of hyaline cartilage: current status. Eur Radiol 12: 814-823, 2002.
21. Maier CF, Tan SG, Hariharan H et al: T2 quantification of articular cartilage at 1.5 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 17: 358-364, 2003.
22. Kramer J, Recht MP, Imhof H et al: Post-contrast MR arthrography in assessment of cartilage lesions. J Comput Assist Tomogr 18: 218-224, 1994.
23. Mosher TJ, Pruett SW: Magnetic resonance imaging of superficial cartilage lesions: role of contrast in lesion detection. J Magn Reson Imaging 10: 178-182, 1999.
24. Peterfy CG, van Dijke CF, Janzen DL et al: Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation. Radiology 192: 485-491, 1994.
25. Potter HG, Linklater JM, Allen AA et al: Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage in the knee. An evaluation with use of fast spin-echo imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80: 1276-1284, 1998.
26. Eng J, Ceckler TL, Balaban RS: Quantitative 1H magnetization transfer imaging in vivo. Magn Res Med 17: 304-314, 1991.
27. Peterfy CG, Genant HK: Emerging applications of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of articular cartilage. Radiol Clin North Am 34: 195-213, 1996.
28. Pozzi Mucelli R, Cova M, Shariat-Razavi I et al: Confronto in Risonanza Magnetica tra sequenze Spin-echo e sequenze con soppressione del grasso nelle malattie dello scheletro. Radiol Med 93: 504-509, 1997