A generative inquiry dialogue system

Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1014-1021

  Black, Elizabeth ^a   Hunter, Anthony ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Conflict handling. Communication: languages; Conversations. Cooperative distributed problem solving: coordination; Cooperation; Negotiation; Pragmatics; Protocols; Semantics; Teamwork

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENTATION; CONFLICT HANDLING. COMMUNICATION: LANGUAGES; CONVERSATIONS. COOPERATIVE DISTRIBUTED PROBLEM SOLVING: COORDINATION; COOPERATION; NEGOTIATION; PRAGMATICS; PROTOCOLS; TEAMWORK;

AGENTS; FUZZY CLUSTERING; INFORMATION THEORY; LINGUISTICS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PROCESSING;

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS;

EID: 60349129611     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1329125.1329417     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. L. Amgoud and N. Hameurlain. An argumentation-based approach for dialogue move selection. In 3rd Int. Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2006), pages 111-125, 2006.
2. L. Amgoud, N. Maudet, and S. Parsons. Arguments, dialogue and negotiation. In 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2000), pages 338-342, Berlin, Germany 2000, 20 - 25 August 2000. IOS Press.
3. T. J. M. Bench-Capon. Specification and implementation of Toulmin dialogue game. In J. C. H. et al., editor, Legal Knowledge Based Systems, pages 5-20. GNI, 1998.
4. E. Black. A Generative Framework for Argumentation-Based Inquiry Dialogues. PhD thesis, University College London, 2006.
5. J. Fox and S. Das. Safe and Sound: Artificial Intelligence in Hazardous Applications. AAAI Press and The MIT Press, 2000.
6. A. J. García and G. R. Simari. Defeasible logic programming an argumentative approach. Theory and Practice of Logic Prog., 4(1-2):95-138, 2004.
7. A. Kakas, N. Maudet, and P. Moraitis. Layered strategies and protocols for argumentation-based agent interaction. In 1st Int. Workshop on Argumentation in MultiAgent Systems (ArgMAS 2004), pages 66-79, 2004.
8. P. McBurney and S. Parsons. Representing epistemic uncertainty by means of dialectical argumentation. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 32(1-4):125-169, 2001.
9. S. Parsons, M. Wooldridge, and L. Amgoud. On the outcomes of formal inter-agent dialogues. In 2nd Int. Conference on Autonomous Agents and Mutli-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2003), pages 616-623, 2003.
10. P. Pasquier, I. Rahwan, F. Dignum, and L. Sonenberg. Argumentation and persuasion in the cognitive coherence theory. In 1st Int. Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2006), pages 223-234. IOS Press, 2006.
11. H. Prakken. Coherence and flexibility in dialogue games for argumentation. J. of Logic and Comp., 15(6):1009-1040, 2005.
12. I. Rahwan, P. McBurney, and L. Sonenberg. Towards a theory of negotiation strategy (a preliminary report). In 5th Workshop on Game Theoretic and Decision Theoretic Agents (GTDT-2003), pages 73-80, 2003.
13. F. Sadri, F. Toni, and P. Torroni. Dialogues for negotiation: Agent varieties and dialogue sequences. In 8th Int. Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL 2001), pages 69-84, 2001.
14. D. N. Walton and E. C. W. Krabbe. Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. SUNY Press, 1995.